On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no > > reverse depends. > > > > Only issue is that we released it with woody. > > > > Are there any objections to removing it from sid/testing? > > Err, that's a bad argument, but I use it... > > Do you have any drop-in remplacement solution ? That may be a stupid > question, but if the package is dropped and it exists a remplacement > solution, a Replace + Provide dependency may be useful to users.
What about plain old gnome-terminal? It supports tabs... -- gram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
