Bug#1074038: /usr/bin/who-uploads: who-uploads fetches accepted information from packages.qa.debian.org/$pefix/$package.html which does not get updates after lifts.debian.org upgrade

2025-04-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 12:41:30 +, Holger Levsen wrote: On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 09:44:45PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: (Admittedly the date parsing is not very elegant.) yes, probably but... if [ "$WANT_DATE" = "yes" ]; then - DATE=$(echo "$HTML

Bug#1074038: /usr/bin/who-uploads: who-uploads fetches accepted information from packages.qa.debian.org/$pefix/$package.html which does not get updates after lifts.debian.org upgrade

2024-12-23 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: tag -1 + patch On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:05:47 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I'm rather unsure if this more should be reported (cloned) as well for > qa.debian.org. It looks that after the lists.d.o migration[1], > packages.qa.debian.org does not get anymore updates on from the > acc

Bug#974344: don't display "Debci reports failed tests" for outdated package versions

2020-11-11 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:08:47 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > doko: because that's the latest test result available; if britney > didn't schedule a "pure unstable" test, then you don't get one. due to > capacity > limitations we stopped scheduling pure unstable tests automatically As an unsolicit

Bug#963526: DDPO: Watch column is empty

2020-06-22 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 01:52:14 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Could you please look into what's broken and restore the version information > in > DDPO? That's most likely #932296 Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP finger

Bug#959931: qa.debian.org: udd.debian.org/dmd no more able to display HTML report

2020-05-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 26 May 2020 13:19:40 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 09:47:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > At least the good thing is that I discovered that DMD actually has users ;) > I look at my DMD page every day, I don't. I look at DMD's RSS feeds :) > so many thanks f

Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?

2020-04-16 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:56:15 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Are all those > > > >Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-* > > > > superficial? > > Most of them yes, because if they fail, that's Very Bad, but if they > succeed, they don't give us a whole lot of confidence that the package > works as

Re: Upstream metadata: Repository-Type field

2020-03-05 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:28:03 +, Iain Lane wrote: > I'm planning to work on #888313 (add upstream git remotes automatically > with gbp clone) today. Nice, I was not aware of this bug and the idea. We're doing something like this in the perl group as well: - add the repo to d/u/metadata - hav

Re: Re: a tiny contribution to Debian QA work?

2020-02-25 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:23:56 +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > I also working on a tool that tries checking (and suggest updates) to a given > list of URLs: bad links, different cases of redirections, replacing http by > https, etc. That sounds like what duck is doing: http://duck.debian.net/ https:

Re: Debian buster: please prepare your service and its dependencies

2019-05-31 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 31 May 2019 16:10:47 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > ==> bendel.debian.org <== > Packages removed from Debian 'testing' (the maintainer might need help): > - libcpan-meta-perl - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libcpan-meta-perl > - postgrey - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/postgrey libcpan-met

Re: What to do with the "Upstream info" links in the PTS and the packages-metadata branch in collab-qa ?

2018-05-08 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:22:40 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Stuart Prescott wrote: > > Are there any other consumers of these files? > No services, but potentially tracker.d.o and packages.d.o. > People interacting with the source package might use them. Right, in the

Re: Feedback on Package overview page - Distro tracker

2018-04-07 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 18:08:21 +0530, Chirath R wrote: > Advanced view: https://chirath02.github.io/advance.html > Simple view: https://chirath02.github.io/index.html > It would be nice if I could get feedback on the new mockup. Thanks, and sorry for the late reply. https://chirath02.github.io/adv

Re: Feedback on Package overview page - Distro tracker

2018-03-27 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:21:25 -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > On 03/27/2018 09:09 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Chirath R wrote: > >> I have made mockup designs for package overview page as part of GSoC > >> project. It would be nice to get feedback on the design and if you co

Bug#872646: qa.debian.org: [debcheck] Escape some HTML before outputting

2017-08-20 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 10:13:47 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Updated patch attached, although the last hunk is probably unnecessary > > anyway. > > Although, I'm not a perl guy so I must ask before applying: > * shouldn't that functi

Re: mass-removing packages that missed both jessie and stretch?

2017-07-20 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 23:29:50 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > So, I propose that we remove from the archive all packages that: > were in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze > AND > were not in jessie at the time of the release > AND > where in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze >

Re: http:// vs. https:// in machine readable copyright file

2017-01-03 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:09:35 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Maybe we should just do the semantically "wrong" thing and suggest people > switch to using https even though that's not a "different" standard. Yes, please. Reasoning: Purely egoistic; everything in and around the pkg-perl group has alre

Bug#824470: DDPO: add last-upload and Standards-Version columns

2016-05-17 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 16 May 2016 08:42:18 -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: > Please, add last-upload and Standards-Version columns. These columns will > provide an easiest mode to find and help very old packages, discover visually > MIA maintainers, predict future problems, etc. I have no opinion if tho

Bug#780587: tried several things today, no luck

2015-03-28 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 14:54:04 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > In perl packages I usally do > > http_proxy= dh_auto_test > > but here something pythonish was complaining about "oh, no idea what > > to do with http_proxy='', giving up", so I used > > env -u http_proxy > > in the end and then

Bug#780587: tried several things today, no luck

2015-03-28 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 10:11:53 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > After trying to unset http_proxy for the tests in debian/rules ... I > > realized that python is different ... and then the tests passed. > what, you realized python is different and that made the test pass? ;-) What > did you? Ok, tha

Bug#780587: tried several things today, no luck

2015-03-27 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 00:34:48 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > I've tried several things today, but still couldnt get the s3ql tests to > succeed in wheezys pbuilder. > > I've tried: > > - disabling the firewall > - unsetting http_proxy in a pbuilder A hook > - build on a system using the wheezy ke

Re: update status of forwared bugs for github

2014-09-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 01:20:38 +0200, Sandro Knauß wrote: > thanks for this information, that's like i thought i could work. Bts-link has > support for github already and the code looks good :) Is bts-link run on > every > package? Or do i have to enable packages for it? In my experience as a me

Re: update status of forwared bugs for github

2014-09-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 23:55:01 +0200, Sandro Knauß wrote: > I created a python script to check the status of forwarded bugs to github for > a given source package and sets the "fixed-upstream" tag. My plan is, that > this script will be available also for other devs and or maybe part of an > auto

Re: [UDD] Seems vcs gatherer needs to be adapted to new alioth [Was: Cron $UAR vcs]

2014-01-09 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 14:57:56 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > it seems the VCS gatherer needs to be adapted to the new Alioth server. > > - Forwarded message from Cron Daemon - > > > > Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:00:03 + > > From: Cron Daemon > > To: lu...@debian.org, laney-...@debian

Re: Multi-bug filing question

2014-01-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:36:20 +0100, Simon Kainz wrote: > Dropping the "+ssh" part leads to working urls. So my question is: > Is there some way (or recommendation) to easily file this bug > against ~20 packages? The devscripts package has a script called mass-bug that can help. Please also chec

Re: Ec2 masternode zone change

2013-11-28 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:03:58 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > New dns is ec2-54-201-105-247.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. It has > > the same credentials that the old one. > What about creating something like aws-master.debian.net ? > It would be easier to remember (at least for me :) % host

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#730422: Please restore the pkg-multimedia tracker

2013-11-25 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: reassign -1 pet.debian.net Control: retitle -1 PET needs to be moved from wagner to moszumanska # let's try to adjust the bug values again :) -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http:/

Re: [PET/UDD] How to get your team into UDD vcs table?

2013-10-25 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:09:22 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Is there any document what exactly to do become a PET-observed team? I don't think so, TTBOMK "ask ansgar" is the only answer. > The list at >http://pet.alioth.debian.org/ > seems to be very outdated and has mainly nothing to do wha

Re: [PET / UDD] Missing teams in vcs table in UDD which should be covered by PET

2013-06-08 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 11:31:54 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I tried to use some PET information from UDD and checked for the existing > teams: > > udd=# SELECT team from vcs group by team; > team > - > pkg-perl > pkg-games > pkg-ruby-extras > debichem > pkg-ocaml

Re: MIA: a...@thened.net - consider orphan packages (rzip)

2013-04-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:03:33 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: > It appears that Alec is no longer reachable: > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a...@thened.net Please contact the MIA team at m...@qa.debian.org Cf. http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MIA Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http

Re: DEP 12: Per-package machine-readable metadata about Upstream

2013-01-03 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:59:00 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: [trimming To: to -qa] > BTW, if we're going to create a new file to hold (in part) upstream > information, it would be really nice if it could replace debian/watch, and > in the long run it would be nice if it would take over some of the > m

Re: UDD postgresql dump

2012-12-15 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:01:19 +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote: > I've downloaded the dump of UDD from [1] and I'm trying to restore > is on postgresql-9.1, however I get tons of errors (see below). Guess: you need to install postgresql-9.1-debversion before. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: htt

Re: [UDD] Does anybody care about PET VCS import into UDD?

2012-10-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:34:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > since some time UDD cron job is spamming me with messages like these > but I do not speal Ruby so can't help here. PET moved from Ansgar's machine to Alioth not so long ago; 217.196.43.134 resolves to alioth.d.o but maybe something else n

Re: UDD chokes on debbugs data

2012-09-20 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:24:12 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > > Did something change recently on the various bugs.debian.org, or on > > ullmann.debian.org? I'm getting the following error during the bugs > > import: > > Storable binary image v25.45 more recent than I am (v2.7) at > > ../../lib/Storab

Re: Some issues with the RDF export

2012-08-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:45:57 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > Kjetil Kjernsmo writes: > > For all the Perl packages, there exists URIs > > for everything on CPAN. The upstream URI of this package is > > http://purl.org/NET/cpan-uri/dist/RDF-LinkedData/project [..] > > Some heuristics could proba

Re: UDD's bug importer problems?

2012-03-27 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:49:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Sorry for being a bother again -- but UDD's bug import seems to be > > stale again. > Indeed, fixed (but it will take some hours to propagate) Thanks alot! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP

UDD's bug importer problems?

2012-03-27 Thread gregor herrmann
Sorry for being a bother again -- but UDD's bug import seems to be stale again. Symptoms: newest "last modified" is 2012-03-25, missing tags, ... Example: #663567 (no 'patch' tag, last modified 2012-03-12, despite my mail + tag yesterday) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: h

Re: UDD bugs stale?

2012-03-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:16:32 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 18/03/12 at 13:24 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > It looks like the newest bugs / latest modifications of bugs on > > http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi are from 2012-03-13. Maybe Don's > > maintenance work on

UDD bugs stale?

2012-03-18 Thread gregor herrmann
It looks like the newest bugs / latest modifications of bugs on http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi are from 2012-03-13. Maybe Don's maintenance work on debbugs earlier this week caused some interruptions? I'd be glad if someone with the appropriate knowledge and permissions could look into this issue.

Re: UDD (bugs.cgi) timeouting

2012-01-02 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:05:45 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi unfortunately timeouts (not sure since > > when, yesterday it worked, now (as in the last 30 minutes) I have no > > success.) > It works now. The machine is a bit overloaded, so when it happens, just > wai

UDD (bugs.cgi) timeouting

2012-01-01 Thread gregor herrmann
http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi unfortunately timeouts (not sure since when, yesterday it worked, now (as in the last 30 minutes) I have no success.) Maybe someone can give it a kick or whatever it needs? Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA

Bug#647708: qa.debian.org: madison.php missing lenny suite

2011-11-05 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:02:41 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > It seems that the madison.php [0] interface is currently lacking > information about the lenny suite. However, it seems that > lenny-security is still included. AFAIK madison.php is symlinked or redirected to use UDD [1], and UDD has d

Re: Bug#634562: wv: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libfreetype.la' is not a valid libtool archive

2011-11-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:39:13 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > It would be great if you could use the list of FTBFS at > > > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/collab-qa/archive-rebuilds/ > > I'm just not sure what you mean by "_use_ the list": "check if it > > still FBTFS there and if it doesn't a

Re: Bug#634562: wv: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libfreetype.la' is not a valid libtool archive

2011-11-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:22:40 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Like some similar bugs, I can't reproduce this (i386 sid cowbuilder). > Hi Gregor, Hi Lucas, > It would be great if you could use the list of FTBFS at > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/collab-qa/archive-rebuilds/ > (e.g > http://ano

Re: Load on udd.d.o

2011-10-23 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:53:58 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Now bugs.cgi indeed doesn't abort anymore; but it timeouts later > > (which was the same during the better part of the last week). > I've done a vacuum full, and removed the data about etch and lenny from > the tables. This seems to hav

Re: Load on udd.d.o

2011-10-22 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:38:04 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Lucas Nussbaum > | In the meantime, DSA, could you reboot samosa (easy option) or restart > | apache and postgres and clean up the remaining processes (if any)? > I've killed a bunch of postgres processes, I think apache should reco

Load on udd.d.o

2011-10-22 Thread gregor herrmann
http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi aborts with "Current system load (40.27) is too high. Please retry later!" The load seems to be increasing, it started out at ~25 some hours ago. I'm not sure who has access on that machine, but maybe someone could take a look before it comes to a grinding halt :)

Re: Effort to test Debian Med repository

2011-09-01 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:49:46 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 07:32:26PM +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > >>> - target called 'get-orig-source' in debian/rules > > It might be easier for everybody to have the same workflow for every > > package. The watch file just get

Re: Popcon results broken in UDD

2009-08-25 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:40:50 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Seems the popcon importer failed in importing any data. Probably related, from one of my machines: 2009-08-25 10:17:08 Start queue run: pid=21322 2009-08-25 10:20:17 1MfnTL-0004mI-2p bellini.debian.org [137.82.84.79] Connection timed ou

Re: [Debconf-discuss] "Teams in Debian: Finding and integrating new members" - summary of the BOF at DebConf9

2009-07-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:18:46 +0200, Kurt Gramlich wrote: > > "Teams in Debian: Finding and integrating new members" > > == > Here is our (skolelinux.de) german ;-) process to become a new > member: > http://wiki.skolelinux.de/NewMember/Prozess

"Teams in Debian: Finding and integrating new members" - summary of the BOF at DebConf9

2009-07-25 Thread gregor herrmann
[mailed to debian-qa (because I think improving the way teams work is an aspect of QA in Debian), and to debconf-discuss (since it's debconf related). RT and MFT set to debian-qa] "Teams in Debian: Finding and integrating new members" == "Tryin

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:07:55 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Of course, and that's exactly what am trying to avoid. What about the > following combination? > > * Lintian issues by themselves do not cause the email to be sent > * Only lintian errors cause a given package to be mentioned in the em

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:37:04 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Would it be ok to leave it that way? or only mention lintian errors? or only > when the same package has serious issues? or only when the same package > does *not* have any serious issue? or any combination of those? or should > lintian

Re: Bug#523282: Re: Bug#523282: qa.debian.org: Email address in package overview is case-specific

2009-04-16 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:18:40 +, jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com wrote: > What about some possibility for the QA software to recognise multiple > email addresses as belonging to the same person? Every DD that switches > to using a @debian.org address must have this irritation. The DDPO pages wor

Re: Group up orphaned packages in order to find adopter faster

2009-04-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:23:56 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > I just had a quick look at the page and noticed that it doesn't have > > only O: bugs but also ITA: bugs (example: #465881 / html-munger / > > tagged pending). I'm not sure if this is on purpose but I'd rather > > have either only O:'d pac

Best practises in team-maintaining packages - summary of the BOFs at DebConf8

2009-02-03 Thread gregor herrmann
Best practises in team-maintaining packages - summary of the BOFs at DebConf8 = Preface --- * First of all please accept my apologies - I promised to write this summary shortly after DebConf but ... * I'm posting th

Re: Self-assessment of the quality of the maintenance work

2008-12-21 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:28:17 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > That's going to be a lot of fairly mindless paperwork for someone who's > > the member of a large, active team with a lot of packages. > Agreed. I'm not sure what's the best way to handle this. > Maybe the form should make it easy to g

Re: Group up orphaned packages in order to find adopter faster

2008-12-03 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:44:50 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Following up the previous discusison (and ignoring all the negative > comments :P ) I played with mako and create an html report [1] from > the script above. It's really rough, I know, but at least present the > result in an easier way to be

Bug#507288: mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:32:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > My personal approach for getting rid of the already existing multiple > > instances of the same mail is a simple procmail recipe [0]; and since > > the problem of duplicate mails already exists anyway (and needs to be > > handled anyway)

Bug#507288: mails to $pkg@p.d.o should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:20:17 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address > > listed in > > maintainers and to those subscribed to the PTS. IMO they also should be > > send > > to the addresses in Uploaders:. Please do so. > Why? Uploa

Bug#507288: mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:35:37 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I generally want > > to get such mail only once, via the mailing list. > I prefer duplicate mails over mails lost. I agree with both of you: I don't like duplicate (or "triplicate", if that word exists) mails but I want to receive mail

Re: Group up orphaned packages in order to find adopter faster

2008-10-27 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:04:06 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > - trying to partition this list in different subset, to facilitate the > adoption by people/team intested in a specific category of packages > An example of its output is in attach, run minutes before sending this > email, just to give you a

Re: RFS: audio-cd (updated package, QA upload, RC bugfix)

2008-07-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:49:26 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > Maybe someone in the Pkg-Perl group has an interest in adopting this into > the group instead? Sounds like a good idea. I'll take a closer look at the package tomorrow. Ch

Bug#469627: qa.debian.org: mention existence of help or gift tagged bugs on the PTS page

2008-03-07 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:25:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Raphael Geissert is working on some code that will allow people > to upload their list of installed packages, and get a list of RC bugs > and release goal bugs affecting those packages Isn't that the same as what rc-alert already does (a

Re: Mass bug filing: non-UTF8 debian/{control.changelog}

2007-11-17 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:36:22 +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > I guess all three files should be checked. > Yes, I'd like to check copyright too, but there's no lintian check for > it atm, so it's more involved to check. Sounds like an idea for an addition to lintian. I've filed a wishlist bug wit

Re: Mass bug filing: non-UTF8 debian/{control.changelog}

2007-11-17 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:46:47 +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > I'm planning to file bugs for packages that use non-UTF-8 encodings in > debian/control and/or debian/copyright. In the subject you mention debian/{control,changelog}, here you speak of debian/{control,copyright}. I guess all three file

Bug#443072: qa.debian.org: incorrect handling of email address given

2007-09-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:48:40 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 03:59:32PM +0200, David Paleino wrote: > > I've just found a bug regarding the handling of the email address. > > Check, for example: > > http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh, what an honour :) > Th