On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:28:17 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > That's going to be a lot of fairly mindless paperwork for someone who's > > the member of a large, active team with a lot of packages. > Agreed. I'm not sure what's the best way to handle this. > Maybe the form should make it easy to give the same answers to all > packages that are maintained by a given team ?
An option for setting values for all packages would be nice (and maybe not only for team-maintained packages). > Another answer might be to hide all packages which are fine under the > current norms (to be defined: no bugs (or less than X bugs), no lintian > errors, ???) and use some predefined answers in those cases. The form would > focus on packages with problems (or that are getting worse over time). I think hiding kind of defeats the purpose of the idea :) But setting sane default values based on some metrics would make it easier indeed. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Paul Simon: The Obvious Child
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
