On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 12:41:30 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 09:44:45PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:(Admittedly the date parsing is not very elegant.)yes, probably but...if [ "$WANT_DATE" = "yes" ]; then - DATE=$(echo "$HTML_TEXT" | sed -ne 's%<li><em>Date</em>: \(.*\)</li>%\1%p') + DATE=$(echo "$HTML_TEXT" | xargs | perl -ne 'print $1 if m%<li><b>Date</b>: (.+) </li>%;') fihow much harm can be done? I'd tend to accept this, what do others think?
Friendly ping.I'm using this patch for 3.5 months, and I haven't seen any problems so far.
I'd be happy if someone merged this change (so I don't have to carry my local patch :)) in order to make who-uploads useable again.
Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature