#x27;t say "You
should fix it." Say, "You should investigate the cause." Or
something appropriately weak.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
This doesn't really answer your question, but at Popcon
http://popcon.debian.org/main/by_inst its stats are:
#rank nameinst vote old recent no-files
(max: 5050)
96setserial 4576 2652 725 1196 3
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
that it is OK to put services in such a state that
they will be improperly started on upgrade. You make it sound as if
upgrade chaos were a long Debian tradition that we should honour and
cherish!
This is the Quality Assurance mailing list so I think I can claim
victory now. :)
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 14:28, Michael Stone wrote:
> If a services is never automatically started by any
> runlevel the only way it will be running is if the admin launches it. I
> do this all the time for things I don't want running on an automatic
> basis, but which I might want when I'm testing s
when a large
number of bugs were suddenly tagged 'pending'. Chris Hanson
went ahead and did an NMU anyway (3.2.2-1.4). B.M. did a
maintainer upload shortly thereafter (3.2.5-1) which ignored
Chris's work.
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 12:09, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 09:28:05AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> >The configuration is not interpreted to mean "no-op". As I said
> >before,
>
> you said it, but it's wrong.
>
> >There is eviden
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 16:20, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Can we just document this to be "Service state is not modified on runlevel
> changes involving that runlevel"? At least, that is not a dangerous, nor
> broken behaviour.
Sorry, I don't follow you here. Which documentation? Do you
]:/etc$ # Notice the absence of rc symlinks!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc$ cat init.d/dummy
#!/bin/sh
echo yay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc$ sudo invoke-rc.d dummy start
yay
However, this just reinforces your main point. Thanks.
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 22:55, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 10:14:11PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> >Argh! You're not supposed to delete _any_ links [...]
> >If there is neither an S nor a K symlink for a service in a
> >runlevel it [...] is a misconfigu
ll remain not running. On the
other hand, if you ask invoke-rc.d to start a service on entering
such a runlevel then it will start it.
Each service needs exactly one symlink (either K or S) in each
of the runlevels to which the system can possibly be switched.
Pant, pant ... >foam< ...
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ryone for their comments.
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ing on a new and better
runlevel editor.
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ctory for
choice as set.
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am now running ALSA 0.9+0beta7-1 and I am finally
able to get saytime to say the time.
The only thing I had to do was to ln -s /dev/dsp /dev/audio.
Unfortunately, the sound quality is very distorted. But
at least it's better than a blurp.
Thomas
Package: perforate
Version: 1.0-8
Severity: normal
Still contains man pages under /usr/man and docs under /usr/doc.
These should be moved under /usr/share/man and /usr/share/doc.
-- System Information
Debian Release: newton
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thanatos 2.4.5-ac9 #2 Fri Jun 8 12:21:44
15 matches
Mail list logo
