On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 12:19, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Isn't it a better thing to resolve all the bugs, and maybe make > a(nother) NMU of the package. And then, remove it *after* the new > alternative will be in a good shape and in the Debian pool?
It appears that an NMU won't be necessary because the maintainer has let it be known that there will be a new release RSN. The big issue (deleting symlinks to disable a service) apparently will remain unfixed in this release but I'll take that up with the maintainer now that he seems to be active again. Thanks to everyone for their comments. -- Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
