heya,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:09:48AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> indeed, when the next piuparts run is scheduled anyway? It might help to
> file/discuss bugs as the recent update-inetd "breakage" (see d-d at [0])
i was doing a piuparts test on a spare machine 2 weeks ago, .. resulted in
hi Filippo,
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:31:29PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> just annoyed by repeated cron files output from removed packages I
> implemented a
> new test for packages: no output from cron files of removed packages.
>
> The interesting bit is here:
> http://qa.debian.org/~fil
hi clint,..
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:04:58PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:50:33PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > It is definetly not blacklisted anymore I talked about that
> > with a berlios admin.
> > How often is dehs updating its data? Is this maybe connected
> > to
hi,
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:34:25PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> when looking at the watch column for the fetchmail package I
> see an error. Looking at the DEHS page on:
> http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=fetchmail
>
> Uscan Errors processing Watch File:
> uscan warning: In w
hi debian-qa,
as a few of you already noticed i have been running archive wide
piuparts tests on main/amd64 for sid. Back in January[0] Lucas already
noticed that lots of packages were failing on purge because of depending
on non-essential packages during postrm, that were the ones i was
looking f
hi,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:17:18PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to just list the bugs which are orphaned > 14 days so
> you don't have to look if the listed package is just orphaned for a few days?
well, i think the page is not only about having a list of long standing
orp
hi again,
there are some perl packages which have been orphaned for quite a while.
Attached a short list, maybe some of you guys from -perl are interested
in taking them over (or moving them to the pkg-perl group).
Some might aswell be candidates for removal, though.
bug;days;packag
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/FAILED
> http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/
filed some bugs here aswell:
id-utils_libuser
#404020 #404021
interchange_libbusiness-ups-perl
#
hi,
ive just had some time to file some bugs, bugnumbers added.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:11:11PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> ub_webmagick
#403994 #403995
> childsplay-alphabet-sounds-ru_childsplay-alphabet-sounds-sv
#403992
> clearsilver-dev_libcgi-dev
#403997 #403996
> ggz-game-s
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/FAILED
> http://people.debian.org/~abi/unstable_install_logs/
>
> note: this list contains only packages available on amd64/main, so might
> be incomplete. I
hi again,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> i had some time to run install tests on all unstable-conflicts listed in
> the above url using cowbuilder. Out of 61 listed conflicts 23 fail to
> install.
>
> A list + logs can be found h
hi,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 02:15:18AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:31:25AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
>
> > I've found some time to publish a list of packages with file conflicts, as
> > stated by Contents.gz.
> > More info at http://qa.debian.org/~filippo/file_
hi again,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:58:31AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> Attached a list showing the Bugids, age of the bugreport and Package
> name.
>
> bug age in days package
on the way, 2 got lost:
#279784770 libfile-counterfile-perl
#321338497
hi -qa, -perl,
there are about 37 *-perl packages with their maintainer set to the QA
group. Some of them have been orphaned for quite a long time and i was
wondering if the guys from the pkg-perl Group could have a look and pick
up some of the interesting ones?
Attached a list showing the Bugids
hi Matthew,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:59:30PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> I've been looking for bugs to fix in etch and have found one which looks
> easily fixable in an orphaned package. I'm not (yet) a DD, however.
> Would you like me to prepare and NMU
Orphaned packages do have the QA gr
hi,
i suggest to remove hubcot for the following reasons:
* dead upstream, last release in 2001
* orphaned for about 4 months now
* RC buggy, does not build against kernel 2.6.18, needs
complete overhaul for new kernel build system etc.
#393524
* already removed from testing
any object
hi,
i suggest to remove rsjog:
* Broken: Needs porting to ruby-gnome2 (#384513)
* Last upstream release in 2002
* Already removed from testing
* Orphaned
* Only 8 installations according to popcon.
any objections?
bye,
- michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
hi,
i suggest to remove alicq:
* broken because of icq protocol changes since more
than 200 days (#353092)
* last upstream release back in 2004
* orphaned since several months
* already removed from testing
* enough alternatives
* only about 40 installations according to popcon
any obje
hi,
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:15:13PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Combined, I don't think fixing the RC bug(s) is worth the effort for the
> package in its current state.
>
> Any objections to removal?
no, please go ahead.
bye,
- michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 12:34:10PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 12:18:59PM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Firstly, i apologize if this place isn't the right mail list to expound
> > this idea.
> >
> > What do you think about export "On vacati
hi Moritz,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 07:12:26PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I'd like to suggest to remove libjpeg-mmx, it adds libjpeg code duplication
> requiring duplicate DSAs for libjpeg security problems, only provides static
> libs, is dead upstream, RC buggy and according to Google th
hi,
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:24:26AM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> Hi,
> the last upload of mma was on upstream version 0.12 on 22-02-2005[1].
> Actually the upstream version is 0.21, so in debian we have missed
> around 9 upstream version. Anybody know the status of his maintainer?
according to m
hi,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:52:43AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> At first I'm bored about the Ruby dependency. I'm not against Ruby but
> I do not want yet another scripting language on a production server.
does that mean you intend to rewrite it in perl or whatever other
scripting language
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:54:08PM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> tcl-sql has been removed 1 year and 187 days ago. One Bug with severity
err, s/removed/orphaned/. Sorry.
bye,
- michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
hi,
tcl-sql has been removed 1 year and 187 days ago. One Bug with severity
"grave" (#266809), open since more than 200 Days. Upstream development
seems to be dead, no CVS commit or new Version since 3 Years. So far,
there exists mysql-tcl, which is also p
hi Bas, *,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:48:25AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> You wrote:
> > see forwarded Message. The Package has been orphaned 118 Days ago, the
> > last upstream release was 2001. Personally, i dont think it makes sense
> > to keep hit. However, if you think its still worth to do
From: Dennis Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:21:43 -0800
To: Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: libnet-finger-perl
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:57:26PM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> i recently stumblet about the libnet-finger-perl pa
27 matches
Mail list logo
