Control: retitle -1 UDD/patches: handling of Forwarded is more strict than DEP-3
On 03/06/25 at 08:21 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
>
> Hi,
>
> https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi?src=atop&version=2.1
Hi,
See https://udd.debian.org/salsa/, or for an example:
https://udd.debian.org/salsa/?email1=pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org&email2=&email3=&packages=&ignpackages=&format=html&branches=on&gitlabci=on&gbpconf=on#results
This provides information about salsa projects configu
Hi,
https://trends.debian.net/
Lucas
Hi Ben,
On 21/08/24 at 00:40 +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Followup-For: Bug #1079070
> X-Debbugs-Cc: benatt...@gezapig.nl
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> No, I'm not a developer.
>
> I just want to see all info like:
>
> upstream-metadata (classification)
> data-tarball-compressi
Hi Ben,
On 20/08/24 at 17:24 +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Followup-For: Bug #1079070
> X-Debbugs-Cc: benatt...@gezapig.nl
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Could you try to limit the number of characters in the information column
> (output)
> (maybe pick a high number of characters a
Hi,
Thanks for the reports!
On 19/08/24 at 21:21 +0200, Ben Tris wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: benatt...@gezapig.nl
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> On /lintian-tag.cgi
>
> These tags are Invalid:
> source-contains-autogenerated-visual-c++-file (pedantic)
> continu
Hi,
On 13/08/24 at 19:28 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
> X-Debbugs-CC: ow...@bugs.debian.org
>
> It appears bug data newer than 2024-08-11 is not making its way into
> UDD. I believe there was an update on the
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
- Forwarded message from Kishan Shah -
From: Kishan Shah
To: Lucas Nussbaum , car...@debian.org
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 08:52:13 +0545
Subject: [BUG REPORT] ~ Reflected XSS in *.debian.org [Ultimate Database
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
the screenshots importer is broken since 2024-07-22.
Error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/srv/udd.debian.org/udd//udd.py", line 83, in
getattr(gatherer, command)()
File "/srv/udd.debian.org/udd/udd/s
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
UDD has an importer for https://janitor.debian.net/.
Unfortunately, the service has been down for some time now.
In the meantime the importer has been removed from UDD's configuration
in commit a13247444876aed518bba50584
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
The ddtp importer is broken since 2024-06-23 with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/srv/udd.debian.org/udd//udd.py", line 83, in
getattr(gatherer, command)()
File "/srv/udd.debian.org/udd/udd/ddtp_gathe
mean Debian Package Tracker.
> The error shown there for this package correspond to a version <
> 1:0.10.0-2 and so to me UDD should be consistant no? (ie. having an error
> valoue and not null)
> As d/watch is only fixed in -2.
>
>
> Le lundi 22 juillet 2024, Lucas Nussbau
Hi,
What is DPT?
You are a bit too fast. The archive doesn't know about version
1:0.10.0-2 yet. What needs to happen on the UDD side is:
- UDD gets a mirror push notification from an archive mirror
- UDD updates its knowledge of the archive
- UDD runs the 'upstream' (= uscan data) importer (this
On 20/05/24 at 08:39 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Package: tracker.debian.org
> Severity: important
>
> The Lintian on tracker.debian.org complains that 4.7.0 is
> newer-standards-version.
>
> Can you please upgrade it to the latest version?
Hi,
I think that tracker.d.o gets its lintian
On 29/02/24 at 18:36 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> There's also something strange in 2024 that needs to be investigated:
That part is fixed
Lucas
On 10/12/23 at 12:10 +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: stu...@debian.org
>
> The 'maintainer' and 'maintainer_email' columns of the upload_history table
> in UDD have truncated email addresses. Somewhere the 'maintainer' data
> is being trunc
On 17/08/15 at 19:34 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: minor
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
>
> I was looking for uploads sponsored by me recently. I searched in
> upload_history by fingerprint and noticed that it says 'N/A'. signed_by
Hi Ansgar,
On 28/02/24 at 08:51 +0100, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:30:28 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > The upload_history importer parses email received by the
> > debian-devel-changes mailing list. On 2024-02-11, the format of those
> >
Hi,
I just refreshed https://trends.debian.net/
Lucas
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
The upload_history importer parses email received by the
debian-devel-changes mailing list. On 2024-02-11, the format of those
emails changed to multipart/signed. Previously the PGP signature was
inlin
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
The email parsing that is at the core of the upload_history table
generates some erroneous values.
- Forwarded message from Patrice Duroux -
From: Patrice Duroux
To: debian-qa
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:36:24
Hi,
> Le mer. 14 févr. 2024 à 19:36, Patrice Duroux
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am a bit surprised with the following output:
> >
> > udd=> select distinct distribution from upload_history;
> > distribution
> > -
I filed a bug about that, but unfor
On 26/02/24 at 11:56 -0800, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Friendly ping. Any updates on progress?
Hi,
I just fixed this by using a vendorized devscripts in UDD. Packages will
get re-checked over the next few days.
Lucas
cont...@bugs.debian.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#993500: Watch sould honor npm source
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To:
reopen 993500
thanks
On 23/12/22 at 15:06 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/12/22 at 14:34 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Control: retitle -1 UDD/upstream: Watch should
Hi,
Some more info in this IRC discussion
09:15 < adsb> without having checked the specifics, the likely answer is "get a
newer devscripts into bullseye-backports", I suspect
09:46 < manphiz> adsb: I see. Would be great to upgrade the server to Bookworm
to get more newer tools, but I guess tha
Hi,
On 07/01/24 at 14:21 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I tried to analyse closed bugs using done_email via carnivore_emails but
> > realised
> > that this table is lacking lots of entries where I could easily add several
> > from
> > my own memory:
>
> [...]
>
> > I wonder how the carnivore_*
On 08/12/23 at 07:39 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 08:36:12PM +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > On 07/12/23 at 20:24 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 07:59:38PM +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > > > On 07/12/23 at 09
On 07/12/23 at 20:24 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 07:59:38PM +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > On 07/12/23 at 09:58 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > by chance I realised that the uploaders table contains some na
On 07/12/23 at 09:58 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> by chance I realised that the uploaders table contains some names where names
> are not stripped:
>
> udd=> select '"' || u.name || '"' as name_with_spaces, uploader from
> uploaders u where name like '% ' or name like ' %' ;
> name
On 19/11/23 at 23:49 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > > This issue still exists. I would now have the need to send the url
> > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/service-file-is-not-a-file to upstream
> > > developers to learn about this Lintian issue, but the URL does not
> > > serve any contents
Hi,
On 03/11/23 at 13:52 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Andreas Beckmann (2023-11-03):
> > The list of RC bugs in sid
> > https://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=sid&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&rc=1&sortby=id&sorto=desc&format=html#results
> > does not contain e.g. #1055136 filed agains
Hi,
On 29/10/23 at 10:36 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noted this notice at the bottom of https://udd.debian.org/lintian after
> doing a search:
>
> ```
> ERROR:There are 1097 source packages in unstable or experimental that are
> unknown by the UDD lintian data. This is probably a bug
On 08/08/23 at 06:42 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Baptiste,
>
> On 07/08/23 at 22:07 +0200, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > On 2023-08-03 10:30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > duck-as-a-service (duck.debian.net) has been broken for a long tim
Hi,
#1042428 is the bug for "no explanation for lintian tags on UDD"
On 26/09/23 at 21:35 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> I know Lintian tag info is available via command line, but I
> frequently need to educate upstreams about Lintian rules, and thus
> really also need a URL to share to them. Pe
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi,
I've been pondering about switching DMD to jquery datatables
(https://datatables.net/). That would allow to use a single big table,
and do stuff like hiding/showing columns on demand.
It could still work without jav
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
08/19/23 22:34:45< elbrus> lucas:
https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=liferea shows a link to youtube
(with
https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?email1=&email2=&email3=&packages=liferea&ignpackages=&format=html<_error=o
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi,
vcswatch knows about the last pipeline status, and the number of merge
requests, in /srv/udd.debian.org/mirrors/qa.debian.org-vcswatch.
See ci_url, ci_status, merge_requests.
but UDD does not import that data.
It
Hi Baptiste,
On 07/08/23 at 22:07 +0200, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On 2023-08-03 10:30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > duck-as-a-service (duck.debian.net) has been broken for a long time,
> > and
> > the corresponding UDD importer is broken as well (see #9
On 06/08/23 at 07:15 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> DDPO does not update the package information for unstable at least.
>
> spatialite (5.1.0-1) & spatialite-tools (5.1.0-1) are in unstable but still
> shows spatialite (5.0.1
Hi,
On 03/08/23 at 11:24 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/08/23 at 10:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > FYI: I added a usertag for trends.d.n bugs to
> > https://bugs.debian.org/qa.debian.org, as an attempt to publicize my
> > To
Hi,
On 03/08/23 at 10:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI: I added a usertag for trends.d.n bugs to
> https://bugs.debian.org/qa.debian.org, as an attempt to publicize my
> To-Do list. It's not a debian.org service but it sounds like the most
> logical place to
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: trends
Severity: wishlist
>From a private mail:
> include a graph with the number of outstanding multi-arch hints
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: trends
Severity: wishlist
>From a private discussion:
It would be useful to publish the raw lintian reports (results of
lintian over all packages for a given lintian version +
date/(source,version) mapping).
A typical use ca
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: trends
Severity: wishlist
>From a private mail:
> I thought about it and I think it would be interesting to have the
> Co-maintenance diagram show:
>
> * Team-maintained
> * co-maintained
> * not co-maintained
> * Orphan
Hi all,
I submitted #1042947 to discuss re-creating a UDD duck importer, using
the same model as the lintian importer.
@Baptiste: could you take a look? There would be a few changes on the
duck side that would make it much easier.
Lucas
Hi,
FYI: I added a usertag for trends.d.n bugs to
https://bugs.debian.org/qa.debian.org, as an attempt to publicize my
To-Do list. It's not a debian.org service but it sounds like the most
logical place to discuss ideas about new graphs.
I updated https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/bugs
Pleas
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
duck-as-a-service (duck.debian.net) has been broken for a long time, and
the corresponding UDD importer is broken as well (see #949009, #963887).
In the meantime, duck continued evolving (was rewritten?
Hi,
On 03/04/23 at 17:58 +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote on 03/04/2023 at 07:21:38+0200:
>
> > Hi DSA,
> >
> > On 23/12/22 at 17:17 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> > > > I think we should very much not keep
Hi Patrice,
On 24/06/23 at 13:04 +0200, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My starting point is:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libxmp
> that does not show the new upstream 4.6.0 (since 2023-06-15)
> and UDD says also that upstream_version is 4.5.0 and not 4.6.0
>
> Are the Debian Tracker content
Hi,
On 16/04/23 at 14:44 -0400, Federico Grau wrote:
>
> fyi -
>
> The code changes above appear to still be resulting in sf.net errors, or at
> least the `unixcw' package still reports Watch errors.
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/commit/395d923257e954663156fa315142415f50d1be6a
>
>
On 13/04/23 at 08:29 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 07:14 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > There's specific code in the UDD uscan wrapper[1] to handle github's
> > rate limiting. We could have something similar for either sf.net, or the
> > s
Hi,
On 12/04/23 at 09:16 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 08:05 +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>
> > For several days sf.php no longer works:
> >
> > ,
> > > uscan warn: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage
> > > https://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/synfig/ failed: 500
Hi Ross,
On 08/04/23 at 16:59 -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: rvandegr...@debian.org
>
> Hello,
>
> I think there are some issues with the Forwarded handling here:
> https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi?src=e17&version=0.25.4-2
>
> DEP3
Hi DSA,
On 23/12/22 at 17:17 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way
> > > > too long already. I'd lean towards shutting it down but a redirect
> > > > would also be OK IMO.
> &g
On 10/03/23 at 12:47 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Diederik de Haas
> > The thing is that the Debian kernel repository is big and that's NOT an
> > error; it's just big. There is no need to take action to fix it.
>
> Hi,
>
> quantz.debian.org has been running out of disk space several times
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
UDD now includes data about patches (see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2023/01/msg2.html ). This data is
already exposed on https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi and
https://udd.debian.org/dmd/ (see the Patches column in
https://udd.debian.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
UDD now includes data about patches (see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2023/01/msg2.html ). This data is
already exposed on https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi and
https://udd.debian.org/dmd/ (see the Patches column in
https://udd.debian.org/d
(Adding lintian-ma...@debian.org to Cc for input)
On 16/02/23 at 11:18 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-02-16 at 01:17 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > it would need to get the list of binary packages for a source and
> > lint all of them with the same lintian call.
>
> The usual way of r
On 07/02/23 at 09:49 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 07/02/2023 09.41, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > But with >3 source packages to monitor, we're not able to verify new
> > releases each hour. It's a process that is spread over a longer period...
>
> I don't know if this is already done, but
On 07/02/23 at 09:41 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2023, xevilstar wrote:
> > I have noticed that on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux the new
> > upstream version takes ages to update.
>
> How long is "ages" for you?
>
> > for example now it displays "A
> > new up
Hi,
On 30/01/23 at 21:58 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:14:53 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Hi Francesco,
>
> Hi Lucas! :-)
>
> >
> > On 30/01/23 at 20:45 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> [...]
> > > W
Hi Francesco,
On 30/01/23 at 20:45 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
>
> Hi!
>
> In the [UDD Lintian report] for my package, I read:
>
> [...]
> | The most recent lintian version known
Hi Guillem,
> I'm wondering why diverge from the patch metadata guidelines? If there's
> a desire to change the field semantics, perhaps it would be better to
> change the guidelines instead? :)
>
> But given this interchange, perhaps we should try to make it more
> clear or explicit about some o
Hi,
On 12/01/23 at 01:57 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The new patch data is great, thanks!
Thanks!
> I just noticed though that it does
> not recognize a "yes" value for the Forwarded field, while the
> "Patch Tagging Guidelines" has this to say about it:
>
> * Forwarded (optional)
On 09/01/23 at 20:51 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-01-07 at 21:47 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > I will file proper bugs for tracker and developer.php integration in
> > a few days.
>
> There is a proposal for a tracker patches panel:
>
> https:/
Hi,
I added a new importer in UDD that provides data about Debian patches
(patches living in debian/patches/).
See
https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi
https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi?src=musescore3
https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi?src=musescore3&version=3.2.3%2Bdfsg2-16
The data is also avai
Control: close -1
On 24/12/22 at 16:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 09:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > OK, I imported ports to ports_* tables.
>
> Thanks, but they don't appear to have any data yet and
> the der
> > > I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way
> > > too long already. I'd lean towards shutting it down but a redirect
> > > would also be OK IMO.
> >
> > I started a wiki page to document how to transition from lintian.d.o to
> > the UDD implementation. That could b
On 30/09/22 at 21:15 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
> X-Debbugs-CC: Thorsten Glaser
>
> The UDD archived_* tables for archive.d.o/debian-archive/ are empty
> even though config is available for importin
On 23/12/22 at 14:34 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source
>
> On 02/09/21 at 09:13 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > Package: qa.debian.org
> > Severity: minor
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
>
Control: retitle -1 UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source
On 02/09/21 at 09:13 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: minor
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Node-resolve watch fail with:
> uscan had problems while searching for a new upstream version:
>
> unknown ct
On 12/12/22 at 21:26 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It would be great if watch had a json mode, like vcswatch does.
>
> E.g. allowing the retrieval of
> https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?package=foo&json=1 to get the watch
> status for package
On 08/09/22 at 16:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
> X-Debbugs-CC: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Aurelien Jarno
>
>
> Currently the unofficial Debian ports archive is imported in UDD tables
> named 'd
On 02/11/22 at 09:50 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way
> > too long already. I'd lean towards shutting it down but a redirect
> > would also be OK IMO.
>
> I started a wiki page to document how
Hi
On 31/08/22 at 19:04 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 21:56:16 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > 1/ Moving the worker node to Debian infra
> >
> > Currently the worker node (that runs lintian) is an AWS VM. It would
> > be nice to m
Hi,
https://trends.debian.net/
Lucas
Hi,
On 30/10/22 at 18:52 +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> > https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?user=cruft...@packages.debian.org&tag=cruft
> is broken
I fixed it. thanks for the report.
> > Is it also possible to get this info in raw json or xml or something ?
> > (it's not that h
On 19/09/22 at 13:57 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 09:30:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > this was caused by this upload: libdatetime-format-datemanip-perl 0.04-1
> >
> > This was a duplicate upload (already uploaded in 2009, then removed).
> >
> > I exc
Hi Holger,
On 22/08/22 at 11:34 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hi,
>
> first: it's great that lintian is under active development again!
> second: it's great that UDD now has up2date information from current lintian
> runs!
>
> (I've bcc:ed abe@d.o and lucas@d.o out of courtesy, so they see this
Hi,
On 26/07/22 at 11:11 -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> It would be really nice if the lintian web page for UDD let you filter
> by lintian tags.
>
> This way, it would be
On 26/07/22 at 17:24 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?dpkg , which DDPO and PTS could use as a
> > link target.
>
> Probably, I'll keep it for the future for now.
> However, may I suggest you make it use a proper querystring instead?
> Like, ?pkg=dpkg, so that it'll
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
lintian.debian.org has been out of date since end of 2021. The question
of its future has been raised with DSA:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2022/07/msg6.html
UDD now has its own importer for lintian data. It also provides a
drop-in replaceme
Hi,
On 06/07/22 at 14:47 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 03/07/22 at 15:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > TLDR: I have plans to get fresh archive-wide data about lintian results
> > in UDD (and then to any service that wants to consume it), but it's
> > still WIP
&g
Dear DSA,
For context, quoting :
> Seeing that lintian got adopted, I got motivated into looking if I could
> help on the lintian.d.o side, that is, provide up-to-date archive-wide
> up to date to developers.
>
> Since the architecture of lintian.d.o seemed quite complicated, I
> instead decided
On 03/07/22 at 15:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> TLDR: I have plans to get fresh archive-wide data about lintian results
> in UDD (and then to any service that wants to consume it), but it's
> still WIP
Update on this:
- the initial scan is still running, and should finish by
Hi Paul,
On 04/07/22 at 10:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-07-03 at 15:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > TLDR: I have plans to get fresh archive-wide data about lintian results
> > in UDD (and then to any service that wants to consume it), but it's
>
TLDR: I have plans to get fresh archive-wide data about lintian results
in UDD (and then to any service that wants to consume it), but it's
still WIP
Hi,
Seeing that lintian got adopted, I got motivated into looking if I could
help on the lintian.d.o side, that is, provide up-to-date archive-wid
Hi,
I just updated https://trends.debian.net/
Lucas
Hi,
On 02/12/21 at 20:48 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Ping,
> we just discussed in our Debian Med video conference whether
> there is some chance to throw money against upgrading the
> hardware of the machine running UDD. What do you think about
> this?
> Kind regards
> Andreas.
You should
Hi,
On 22/11/21 at 10:24 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since some time the Debian Med packages are not updated any more. The
> output of the job can be found in the logfile[1]:
>
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "./tasks.py", line 28, in
> tasks.GetAllDependencies()
Hi,
On 11/10/21 at 08:39 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the issue described below by Nilesh Patra might be caused by the
> fact that the UDD dump[3] is not updated properly. I just downloaded
> the dump and get a modification time of
>
>Modify: 2021-10-11 02:55:01.0 +
On 23/08/21 at 19:29 -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> Em seg., 23 de ago. de 2021 às 15:53, Lucas Nussbaum
> escreveu:
> >
> > Indeed, the upload_history implementation is fragile (or more correctly:
> > its data source is fragile). There are a few uploads whose emails to
> &
Hi,
On 22/08/21 at 23:15 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 05:43:19PM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Today I noticed an issue
>
> You reported true things, but I doubt this is in any way related to the
> current issue.
>
> Are you saying these inconsistenc
For those not following IRC:
the cron jobs have been re-enabled, and everything looks back in order.
Lucas
On 19/08/21 at 16:29 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-08-19 at 11:37 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 11:20:47AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > ullmann.debian.org, the host for udd.d.o, filled its PostgreSQL
> > > partition overnight. DSA added another 5GB o
On 17/04/21 at 08:08 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:03:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I just updated Debian Trends: https://trends.debian.net/
>
> Thanks a lot for Debian Trends. I have checked the code smells[1] for
>
(Adding debian-qa@ to Cc to broaden the discussion a bit)
Hi,
On the issue of lintian.d.n/lintian.d.o/UDD/tracker.d.o, I wonder if the
separation of concerns is the right one.
I think that in Debian, we would aim for a better separation between:
A/ QA tools development, focused on getting the g
On 13/04/21 at 11:18 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi Lucas
>
> I would like to add:
>
> - Removing Berkeley DB.
To clarify, I was focusing on stuff that is already tracked via Trends.
Lucas
Hi,
On 08/04/21 at 09:06 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:03:47PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I just updated Debian Trends: https://trends.debian.net/
>
> Thank you.
> I noted that the dates in the "smells" sections are still old. Could
On 09/04/21 at 19:49 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> The X Strike Force is still sticking to format 1.0, with one of the main
> reasons being that it makes it easier to cherry-pick one or several
> upstream commits. In the 3.0 format you have to create a separate patch
> and later remove it when merg
1 - 100 of 786 matches
Mail list logo
