Hi, > Le mer. 14 févr. 2024 à 19:36, Patrice Duroux > <patrice.dur...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > I am a bit surprised with the following output: > > > > udd=> select distinct distribution from upload_history; > > distribution > > ---------------------------------
I filed a bug about that, but unfortunately the whole upload_history gatherer code is fragile, because it is based on parsing the mailing list archives... So I'm not sure this will be fixed at some point. On 19/02/24 at 11:15 +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote: > Hi, > > May I also suggest renaming this 'upload_history.distribution' column > to 'upload_history.release' for a better consistency with the other > tables that have the two columns (distribution and release)? UDD generally follows the naming from the source data. I agree that there's some confusion between distribution and release that requires extra care when writing queries, but I don't think that we should change that at this point given it would be an API change and there might be external consumers of the raw (SQL) data. Lucas
