Hi, On 03/04/23 at 17:58 +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Hi, > > Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote on 03/04/2023 at 07:21:38+0200: > > > Hi DSA, > > > > On 23/12/22 at 17:17 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >> > > > I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way > >> > > > too long already. I'd lean towards shutting it down but a redirect > >> > > > would also be OK IMO. > >> > > > >> > > I started a wiki page to document how to transition from lintian.d.o to > >> > > the UDD implementation. That could be useful if you turn lintian.d.o > >> > > into a static page saying it has been shutdown, and want to point > >> > > somewhere to help people transition. > >> > > >> > https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ReplacingLintianDebianOrg > >> > >> Hi DSA, > >> > >> So, > >> - lintian.debian.org has now been providing stale data for almost a year > >> - the replacement running on top of UDD has been working fine since > >> July, and is already used by at least tracker.d.o and > >> qa.d.o/developer.php > >> - nobody has objected shutting down lintian.debian.org > >> > >> How can we move forward with the shutdown of lintian.debian.org? > > > > lintian.debian.org came up again in a discussion > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033065#54 > > > > People are confused. Maybe it's time to stop it and point to > > https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ReplacingLintianDebianOrg > > ? > > Could you file a RT ticket? if there's already one, can you point it to > me, a brief overlook didn't bring it to me. > > As soon as I have this, I'll try to do what's needed. > > Cheers! > -- > PEB
Filed as #9275 Lucas
