Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
It seems there is a small bug in the pts somewhere. For some
packages, the pts reports they are not in unstable, even though
rmadison (and the pool) says they are.
For example:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl.html
http://pack
Hi Lucas!
You wrote:
> The audience clearly want orphaned packages to be removed. I'm not quite
> sure it's reasonable to do that. However, clearly, there's no opposition
> to this idea. When snapshots.debian.org will be fully fonctional, a web
> interface will allow users to fetch and install re
Hi Russ!
You wrote:
> Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>
> >> I'm planning to file bugs for packages that use non-UTF-8 encodings in
> >> debian/control and/or debian/copyright.
> >
> > Can you report on any progr
rt.cgi?bug=453954
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Hi gregor!
You wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:46:47 +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>
> > I'm planning to file bugs for packages that use non-UTF-8 encodings in
> > debian/control and/or debian/copyright.
>
> In the subject you mention debian/{control,changelog
-
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae
Hi Michael!
You wrote:
> i suggest to remove hubcot for the following reasons:
I already filed a bug about its removal:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395502
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetek
ere no objections, I've gone ahead and asked for its removal:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395502
--
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
||
opcon.
--
+----+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644
ed.
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b
ndidate. Are there any packages in Debian that
offer similar functionality?
--
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EM
can be easily replaced with some other package,
or packages that are buggy or otherwise unusable. If that is
exactly what you mean by your point (d) above, fine with me, but
please put it explicitly in your list then.
--
Kind regards,
+------
. That would maybe improve the atmosphere a bit. Nobody is
attacking you personally, we are just trying to have a civil
conversation (at least I am).
Thanks,
Bas.
--
Kind regards,
+------
In other cases, IMO, it's a lot of work to check and remove the
packages (both for the QA and the FTP teams), without any real gain for
the project.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7
. Even if only a few people use the
package, why annoy them by removing it from Debian?
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24
> libpng as packaged with Debian and uses upstream's versions of these
> libraries statically compiled in.
Please don't do that, it will make everyone's live (en specifically
those of the security team) much harder.
--
Kind regards,
+------
with sysklogd, but I
agree that syslog-ng is a lot nicer. I didn't know that it is
unmaintained upstream though.
What are other distributions using?
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7
Hi Daniel!
You wrote:
> Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libubit-dev
Maybe this package should just be removed? It doesn't have any reverse
dependencies afaics, and hasn't had a non-QA upload since feb 2004.
Greetings,
Bas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
egards,
+----+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 064
ny bugs, I see no reason to have it removed.
Feel free to adopt it, though.
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fe
deed.
However, I think Martin also has some scripts, that overlap partially
with mine. Maybe we should merge them?
> We should probably add some copyright notices and
> a licence then...
Jep.
--
Kind regards,
+---
andled at previous BSPs? Or was it just ignored
> like I did?
I think we had it on both networks last (or t least a previous) time,
using online irc logs to coordinate.
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw
after the month.)
Please also send an email to the bug submitter, asking if this is still
a problem or was already fixed (in one way or another).
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7
Hi Martin!
You wrote:
> It fails to build from source here (on mips):
[...]
> 16:37 so what's the fix?
> 16:37 you'd need to upgrade it to libtool 1.5
How?
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Martin!
You wrote:
> Could someone QA upload a new upstream of pfe? Then we could get rid
> of the build-depends on xm-tool and at least remove this (orphaned)
> package.
I'm on it.
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
|
n from the remind.input and retitle.input
files spit out by wbos.
wbos itself also spits out emails to messages/*. I'm not sure whether
or not these are more up to dat than the ones generated by the
wnpp-{close,retitle,remind} scripts).
--
Kind regards,
+-----
t; > If anyone is working on this already or has other reasons to warn me
> > about doubled work, please stand up :)
>
> You'd have to ask bas. CCed.
Which package are we talking about?
--
Kind regards,
+---------
, I'd vote to remove it now.
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
++
Hi Andrew!
You wrote:
> [Next time: orphaned packages with RC bugs]
A list of those is already available at
http://master.debian.org/~bas/wbos.html
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644f
ms will make it impossible to include in debian.
AFAIK, there is no automatic way of doing this.
What about adding a new tag, something like CBP (cannot be packaged), to
the wnpp?
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
|
wed up the Reply-To header. Also, they were sent
in one batch, so there was no stopping it when I found out that it had
gone wrong :((.
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw
f NUT indeed has all the features and supports all hardware bpowerd and
upsd do, feel free to file a bug againt ftp.debian.org, asking for their
removal.
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
|
s should be closed after being
inactive for a while. There are only 54 RFPs in the WNPP atm though, so
I don't this is really a problem yet.
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw
information utility
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
++
ed bugs.
me too
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
++
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-03
Severity: normal
Hi!
There's a small enoding error in developer.php, causing links to
packages containing + chars (such as gtk+2.0) to fail. The + char is
literally copied into the url, causing it to be interpreted as a space.
Take a look
d regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
++
Hi Martin!
You wrote:
> You sent the pings to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but this will
> not reach the bug submitter...
Yeah, I know :-((
See my "I fucked up" mail.
--
Kind regards,
+----+
| Bas Zoetekouw | G
uncer
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
++
gards,
+----+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
++
close 158142
thanks
allegro4 was removed from the archive. Closing the O: bug.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-23
Severity: normal
Please remove gide from the archive. It is orphaned, has been
uninstallable since last february, its upstream is dead, and is has been
obsoleted by anjuta (see http://primates.ximian.com/~dave/gideweb/ and
http://b
Hi Matej!
You wrote:
> Can we remove ssh2? It's non-free, it was orphaned more than a year
> ago, and it has 21 bugs open.
Please go ahead and fle a bug against ftp.debian.org.
--
Kind regards,
+--------+
| Ba
filed: 374, changed 374
#108936 passivetex filed: 374, changed 374
#108938 tei-lite dtd filed: 374, changed 374
#108939 tei/p4 xml dtd filed: 374, changed 374
--
Kind regards,
+--------
# - Orphaned package most of my packages (#145660) does not exist
# - Orphaned package most of my packages (#145661) does not exist
reopen 145660
reopen 145661
unmerge 145660
unmerge 145661
close 145661
clone 145660 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 -17 -18 -19
-20 -21
retitle
# - Unknown bug type or incorrectly formatted subject line (#68144)
retitle 68144 RFP: dexpire -- expire INN articles
# - ITP'ed package framerd ([2]#105312) already exists in the archive
close 105312
# - Unknown bug type or incorrectly formatted subject line (#111360)
retitle 111360 RFP: pbpg
iuals that consider themselves
part of QA, don't do any thing useful. On the contrary.
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| qu
s non-free
> parts to it. Therefore it really can't be made available via the
> Debian servers.
Tagging it, as AJ suggested.
--
Kind regards,
+-----------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|--
> timestamp, and I'd appreciate it if it could be left out of this round
> of ITP->RFP changes.
OK.
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|-
unactive or something) when sending the QA question. Then
my script can easily determine which one to remove.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|-
#113653, filed: 109, changed 109
webrt2 #114116, filed: 105, changed 105
kftgt#114161, filed: 104, changed 104
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Thomas!
You wrote:
> 1) There are a metric ton of ITPs. *Something* should be done. But I
>don't know what.
After 4-6 weeks of inactivity, they should be renamed to RFP's.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
intian should warn for wrong QA maintainer addresses.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EM
, that's another thing that that script I'm working on, will check
for.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire,
t some packages will have to be renamed to RFA
instead of O.
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
|
e conclusion was 4 to 6
weeks.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | b
t this up on
auric.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?
, while at the same time allowing everyone to
work on any task, as long as the coordinator is notified, or something
like that?
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|
ecause I made an
| error somewhere), I don't think it's still necessary to keep
| gcc-m68k-linux in the archive.
|
So, I think it can be safely removed.
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'o
removal.
Hmm, I thought I had this fixed. I'll look into it.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EM
ckage's Priority.
OK.
> Other than that, since this is obviously doing a much better job than
> my version, would you like to take charge of the weekly report
> generation?
Sure, but please wait until my script is bug free ;)
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pablo Picasso |
+---+
e following errors were encountered:
- 111032: orphaned package "yodl" does not exist in archive
- 114822: RFA'ed package " AOLserver-postgres" does not exist in archive
- 118234: incorrectly formatted subject line encountered:
ttf-xwatanabe-mincho -- Extended Watanabe Mi
t really be a problem. My script already gathers all the
info that is also in the wnpp report, so I only have to print it.
--
Kind regards,
+-----------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|--
)
- Duplicate bugs with different types found (package "lvs"):
114113(ITA) 114725(O)
- Duplicate bugs with different types found (package "cdbackup"):
118145(ITP) 118147(RFP)
[1] Orphaned packages are to be removed after:
- 300 days (main, no RC bugs)
; - 104197: ITA'ed package "kannel" does not exist in archive
>
> kannel is in non-US.
Yep, that's because there are no non-us Packages/Sources files available at
master. I'll rsync them over later, but for the testing it didn't seem
very important.
--
Kind r
x27;ed package "dvb" does not exist in archive
- 118234: incorrectly formatted subject line encountered:
ttf-xwatanabe-mincho -- Extended Watanabe Mincho Japanese TrueType font
for JIS X 0213:2000
- 119093: RFA'ed package "libsrgp" does not exist in ar
ject line encountered:
ITO: wemi -- Branch of SEMI kernel package using widget.
- 119699: incorrectly formatted subject line encountered:
wnpp: ITP rudiments - C++ class library providing base classes
- 119700: incorrectly formatted subject line encountered:
wnpp: ITP
* orphaned for more than 365 days
> * orphaned with RC bugs that've been open for more than 14 days
Seems like a good plan to me. I'll see if I can get up with a automatoic
mailing thingie this weekend.
--
Kind regards,
+-------
about
the use of Debian.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pablo Picasso |
+---+
,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pab
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: n/a; reported 2001aug20
Severity: normal
Please remove xserver-ggi and libggidemos from the archive. They are
obsolete and still have to make the fhs transition.
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw
. Furthermore, it has build problems
and is uninstallable.
If the fhs problems aren't fixed quite soon, I'll ask ftp-admin to
remove this package.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sai
.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pablo Picasso |
+---+
ause I know nothing of scheme, I have no
idea how to make it build.
17. sauce
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patch in BTS.
18. userv
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patch in BTS.
19. xserver-ggi
Charles Briscoe-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Obsolete, remove? (see #103396
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.6.6.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xcopilot - Pilot emulator
Closes: 88776 104793
Changes:
xcopilot (1:0.6.6.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pablo Picasso |
+---+
Hi guys!
Does anyone have any idea why the lintian reports are still down?
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va fai
id of some FHS bugs.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon
system build failed for some reason
--
Kind regards,
+-----------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECT
an always use the vanilla linux kernel from any
kernel.org mirror.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROT
script out there to do automatic
builds (including installation of build-depends)?
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire
? Should I report critical bugs
> against the above packages (the policy says "must") ?
I think bugs about this issue have already been reported.
--
Kind regards,
+-----------+
| Bas Zoetekouw
unixodbc-bin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
godbcconfig - GTK Based ODBC Configuration GUI
unixodbc - ODBC tools libraries
unixodbc-bi
d regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pablo Picasso |
+---+
Hi Debian!
You wrote:
> > reassign 94892 xxgdb
> Bug#94892: libXaw error when open() returns fd 0
> Bug reassigned from package `xlib6g' to `xxgdb'.
Huh? I thought this was a libXaw bug?
--
Kind regards,
+------
.
Well, he is still active, at least at debian-french.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL
ividual section. This should be rather
easy to solve (so that you could for example set LINTIAN_SECTION=sid/*).
I'll see if I have time to look at this later this week.
I hope this helps in getting the daily lintian runs back online again
soon.
--
Kind regards,
+--
4892) in libXaw.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?|
|[EMAIL
nerves. :)
Done.
--
Kind regards,
+-----------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pablo Picasso |
+---+
for stable.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?
Hi!
When building packages that are orphaned and have maintainer set to the
QA team, should I consider my uploads NMU's, or not?
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exa
: 2.4.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA
Changed-By: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
mhonarc- Mail to HTML converter
Closes: 94463
Changes:
mhonarc (2.4.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (closes: #94463)
* Added Build-D
d regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
supported, and I am compiling it against 2.2.18pre21.
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECT
directory `/build/bas/orphan/arla-0.23'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va
rce is at http://www.a-eskwadraat.nl/~bas/LBR).
I don't know how much work it would be to integrate this in Lintian, but
a lot of code should be recycleble. Unfortunately, I won't have time to
look into this until after Easter.
--
Kind regards,
+------
I help
getting them working again?
--
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kind regards,
+-------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|| que l'on va faire, a quoi|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire?
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
