Hi Marcelo! You wrote:
> > There are 809 WNPP bugs in the BTS, of which > > - 52 are RFA's (packages in need of adoption) [2 contrib, 3 non-free] > > "offered up for adoption"? OK. > > - distributed-net-pproxy, 216 days orphaned, 0 RC bugs [non-free] > > Description: Personal proxy for distributed.net clients > > I really miss the reverse depends info here. It's useful in some > cases, e.g.: > > blas (#115397), orphaned 41 days ago > Description: common lin. alg. routines > Reverse Depends: lapack-dev petscgraphics1 atlas-test > petscgraphics1-demo blitz++ lapack r-base-dev blas-dev I agree. I already mplemented the revdeps, but somehow they don't get printed. Will fix. > > The following ITA's will be renamed to O's or RFA's[2]: > > - 68134 ITA --> RFA: auto-pgp (1085 days old) > > this information is useful, but I don't think it belongs in a mail to > debian-devel-announce. Informing the person who submitted the bug > about it is a good idea. Informing debian-devel or debian-qa is also a > good idea. Hmm, OK, it might indeed be better to split the report in two: one part (with general stats, packages to be removed, list of all orphaned and RFP'ed packages) to d-d-announce, and one (with renaming and merging notification and errors) to d-d/d-qa. > > > The following duplicate bugs will be merged: > > - new-pinepgp: 88327(RFP) 110743(ITP) > > please inform the submitters, too. Yes, of course. In fact, everyone who ever contributed to the bug log is Cc'ed. This is probably overkill, but it won't really hurt anyone i think. > > [1] Orphaned packages are to be removed after: > > - 300 days (main, no RC bugs) > > - 50 days (contrib, no RC bugs) > > - 25 days (non-free, no RC bugs) > > - 150 days (main, one or more RC bugs) > > - 25 days (contrib, one or more RC bugs) > > - 10 days (non-free, one or more RC bugs) > > [2] ITA's will be renamed to O's or RFA's after 50 days > > [2] ITP's will be renamed to RFP's after 50 days > > Please take into account package's Priority. OK. > Other than that, since this is obviously doing a much better job than > my version, would you like to take charge of the weekly report > generation? Sure, but please wait until my script is bug free ;) -- Kind regards, +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce | |--------------------------------| que l'on va faire, a quoi | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | bon le faire? | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pablo Picasso | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
