Hi Luca! You wrote:
> > I intend to retitle those to RFPs: > > Is it the procedure? > I mean: if no one packaged them in more than a year, it could mean there is > no one interested in that package any more. > More over, some of that software may no longer be developed or even exists. > IMHO we may close those kind of reports, along with those older RFP. Hmm, perhaps you are right. However, my motivation to seek out the non-active ITPs in the first place, is to give other developers a chance to work on those packages. You are probably right though, that RFPs should be closed after being inactive for a while. There are only 54 RFPs in the WNPP atm though, so I don't this is really a problem yet. -- Kind regards, +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | |----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
