Thu, 5 May 2005 13:02:38 +0200,
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:54:38AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:01:41PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> > Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:43:59 +0200,
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The only packages that haven't moved to liblog4j1.2-java are:
>
> * libjfreereport-java: Upstream comes bundled with 1.2.3, so the switch
>should be painless. Pat
problem with powerpc. But since
powerpc is what you compiled locally, I suppose it is a piece of cake to
be fixed. I would like to see 1.1.x entering testing sooner so that more
people can test against it. Thanks a lot for your hard work!
--
Regards,
Alan
--- End Message ---
--
Arna
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libcommons-net-java
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcommons-net-java.html
last upload on May 29!
It's a lib from the jakarta project and could be useful for
developers. Doogie asked for this lib for a more important package (to
be packaged)
libcommons-collections-java still waiting in incoming...
Can someone help me with this problem?
I need it to move to main because I got three other packages waiting
libcommons-collection-java to move to main so they can also move to
main! ;-)
Many thanks for your time and help,
--- Begin Messag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know if it's a known problem because I have a huge mail back log
;-) but http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ is Not Found and returns
a 404...
Is there another URL?
Cheers,
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
-BEGIN PGP SI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://incoming.debian.org/?M=A
libcommons-collections-java-doc_2.1-1.1_all.deb 08-Apr-2004 09:02 7k
libcommons-collections-java_2.1-1.1_all.deb 08-Apr-2004 09:02 173k
What is the problem with those?
Also, these one are stuck
p; answered just two mails in this thread ago already,
or is my memory failing?
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--- End Message ---
--
Arnaud Vandyck
< sam> /.ing an issue is like asking an infinite number of monkeys for
advice
-- in #debian-devel
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Shouldn't this bug be reassign to ftp.debian.org?
>
> IMHO, yes, ftp-master can fix this, or at least advice as how to fix it.
>
> Wasn't this discussed just a few days ago already, or is my memory failing?
Yep, you are right, that's why I was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Shouldn't this bug be reassign to ftp.debian.org?
junit is in main but tarball is in contrib.
Cheers,
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAiSe+4vzFZu62tMIRAtV1AK
thanks,
Forwarded message:
To: debian-qa
Cc: James Troup and others <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: jdom source package no more maintained
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:38:40 +0200
M
* unstable (libs): 0.99.b10-1
Binary packages: libjdom-java
Takashi changed the name of the source package but jdom still exists and
provides a libjdom-java package.
Shouldn't jdom removed from the archives?
Cheers,
- --
Arnaud Vandyck
I'm personally quite happy with one stable relea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think I uploaded commons-collections but I don't see it here:
>> http://incoming.debian.org/
>>
>> Of course (it was an NMU) I did remove the package from my disk after
>> updating the Alioth's pkg-java cvs r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I think I uploaded commons-collections but I don't see it here:
http://incoming.debian.org/
Of course (it was an NMU) I did remove the package from my disk after
updating the Alioth's pkg-java cvs repository, so I do not have access
to the .uploa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
>> AFAIK, Only RedHat/Fedora do this (but they are at the source! A lot
>> of RedHat devs are working on gcj). If we can do this, we'll be one
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
>> Thanks, note that with this package in main, I'm able to move two other
>> java packages to main... and with these two, more (and more, an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * On 08-04-04 - 16:07, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I did move commons-collections to main. Do I have to send a bug to
>> ftp.debian.org? I'd like it to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I did move commons-collections to main. Do I have to send a bug to
ftp.debian.org? I'd like it to be accepted as soon as possible.
Also, I think I have a problem with another package I moved to main but
I'm not sure the sources are in main... (I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Just trawling through the BugScan output, I found a few easy-to-fix RC bugs
>> that
>> have had patches sitting around for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-19 15:59]:
>> As you are the maintainer, maybe it's better if you file a bug against
>> ftp.debian.org asking for xml-commo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi QA, Hi Benoit,
Benoit is the maintainer of liblog4j package which is wildly used by the
java packages to build and to run.
liblog4j is in contrib, so it prevents a lot of java packages to go in
main. I already file a bug 123 days ago to ask Benoit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:35:16PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> Mark, are you busy at the moment? Do you mind if I do NMU these
>> packages?
>
> Not at all. Please do NMU, in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just trawling through the BugScan output, I found a few easy-to-fix RC bugs
> that
> have had patches sitting around for a while. So, here goes:
>
> 233145: docbook-slides is missing a Build-Dep on xml-core. O
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 09:10:53PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-13 12:03]:
>
>> > I looked into this a while ago - it appears to have been abandoned by
>> > upstream. It's probably possible to fix it to use TL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for pointing these bugs. I also see you file bugs in the bts. I'm
Cc:ing kamop.
Isn't it a better thing to resolve all the bugs, and maybe make
a(nother) NMU of the package. And then, remove it *after* the new
alternative will be in a good shap
"R. Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> rcconf has always worked fine for me BTW.
It works really fine for me too
--
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
ers.
>
> I'd highly recommend that this group utilize Alioth to its fullest, so
> that co-maintainers can best pool their resources.
And "not yet DD's" can help ;)
I also think Alioth's a good thing.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
: :' :
nation?
-- Arnaud Vandyck @ work
FingerPrint = 82F3 45D0 F1B2 D79E D0BE 5188 E2FC C566 EEB6 B4C2
, .
| Linux Copy Party le 26 avril 2003 au Val Benoît |
| http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.
28 matches
Mail list logo
