Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-30 Thread Raphael Geissert
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Also, if packages have lintian errors/warnings, please provide a link to > the proper full list of errors and warnings for the maintainer. Did you read my original email? :) Let me quote it for you: > === libflexmock-ruby: > = Lintian reports 3 warning(s), you should co

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 30/04/09 at 12:07 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > On 2009-04-30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >> On 30/04/09 at 01:43 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >>> But despite all that my original question hasn't quite been answered. > >>> Gregor is in favour of sending messages e

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:07:55 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Of course, and that's exactly what am trying to avoid. What about the > following combination? > > * Lintian issues by themselves do not cause the email to be sent > * Only lintian errors cause a given package to be mentioned in the em

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-30 Thread Raphael Geissert
Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2009-04-30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> On 30/04/09 at 01:43 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >>> But despite all that my original question hasn't quite been answered. >>> Gregor is in favour of sending messages even if only lintian issues >>> exist, but Lucas doesn't like the

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-30 Thread Raphael Geissert
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:43:55AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> Gregor is in favour of sending messages even if only lintian issues >> exist, but Lucas doesn't like the idea. What about something in >> between? only errors if another issue exists for the same g

Bug#526237: qa.debian.org: bugs count shows 0 bugs for package with bugs

2009-04-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > I just noted that qa.debian.org shows 0 bugs for a package with 3 open > bug reports (those bugs are already rather old, so if the bug counts are > only updated e.g. daily they should have been counted long ago): > http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nvidi

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-30 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-04-30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 30/04/09 at 01:43 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> But despite all that my original question hasn't quite been answered. Gregor >> is in favour of sending messages even if only lintian issues exist, but >> Lucas doesn't like the idea. >> What about someth

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 30/04/09 at 01:43 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > But despite all that my original question hasn't quite been answered. Gregor > is in favour of sending messages even if only lintian issues exist, but > Lucas doesn't like the idea. > What about something in between? only errors if another issue

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-30 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:43:55AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > But despite all that my original question hasn't quite been > answered. Hasn't it? > Gregor is in favour of sending messages even if only lintian issues > exist, but Lucas doesn't like the idea. What about something in > between