On 30/04/09 at 12:07 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > On 2009-04-30, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote: > >> On 30/04/09 at 01:43 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >>> But despite all that my original question hasn't quite been answered. > >>> Gregor is in favour of sending messages even if only lintian issues > >>> exist, but Lucas doesn't like the idea. > >>> What about something in between? only errors if another issue exists for > >>> the same given package? or only errors if there's an issue for any of > >>> the co-/maintained packages? > >> > >> I would be fine with any of that. However, the real problem is to keep > >> the signal-to-noise ratio high in ddpo mails. If it just becomes yet > >> another regular email that can be safely ignored, it will be a net loss > >> for QA. > > Of course, and that's exactly what am trying to avoid. What about the > following combination? > > * Lintian issues by themselves do not cause the email to be sent > * Only lintian errors cause a given package to be mentioned in the email, > not warnings. > * Errors and warnings counts are both included. > > Or the following one: > > * Lintian issues by themselves do not cause the email to be sent > * Neither lintian errors nor warnings cause a given package to be mentioned > in the email. > * Errors and warnings counts are both included.
This one sounds simpler, but I wouldn't mind the first one neither. Also, if packages have lintian errors/warnings, please provide a link to the proper full list of errors and warnings for the maintainer. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
