On 2009-04-30, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote: > On 30/04/09 at 01:43 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> But despite all that my original question hasn't quite been answered. Gregor >> is in favour of sending messages even if only lintian issues exist, but >> Lucas doesn't like the idea. >> What about something in between? only errors if another issue exists for the >> same given package? or only errors if there's an issue for any of the >> co-/maintained packages? > > I would be fine with any of that. However, the real problem is to keep the > signal-to-noise ratio high in ddpo mails. If it just becomes yet > another regular email that can be safely ignored, it will be a net loss > for QA.
And as lintian is already a tool that can be safely ignored, adding its output to the ddpo-by-mail emails will put them in the same box. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
