> It's not that it's hard,
> it's that they're not interested.
Well, they doesn't want to think to a little regular expression for help Qa
Purposes?
Or the problem is that all the Debian developer think that Dehs is bootless for
helping
Debian-qa?
>Another reason why some packages don't have a
Buy your drug of choice, NO prescription required
Today's special: Free overnight Fedex delivery
Vicodin.$2.59/dose
Hydrocodone$2.14/dose
Xanax...$2.53/dose
Valium..$2.64/dose
Phentermine..$0.86/dose
Stock is limit
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:25:10AM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
In all this cases, is it so hard for Mantainers to fill watch file in
their own packages for Qa pourposes?
We've had this argument before and the problem remains that many
devlopers don't see a point to putting one in. It's not that it
>Did you consider the possiblity that many package maintainers don't
>find
>the Watch file useful? Such things as:
>
>Upstream is package maintainer.
>
>Upstream development is dead.
>
>Package maintainer on upstream mailing list.
Ok, well. So the Watch file rationale could be switche
Quoting Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> retitle 243668 packages.qa.d.o should move from master to merkel
> severity 243668 wishlist
> thanks
>
> packages.qa.d.o should still move to merkel, but this is only a
> wishlist.
Why ?
The only reason why the PTS is hosted on master is because of the
proximity
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 07:32:06PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Quoting Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> > retitle 243668 packages.qa.d.o should move from master to merkel
> > severity 243668 wishlist
> > thanks
> >
> > packages.qa.d.o should still move to merkel, but this is only a
> > wishlist.
>
>
Your message dated Tue, 4 May 2004 17:06:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247333: qa.debian.org: The package "traffic-vis" is
missing in the "testing" distribution of Debian.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
The package "traffic-vis" is missing in the "testing" distribution of
Debian. In "Unstable" distrubution it is located in the file
"ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_contrib_binary-i386_Packages" but
in the testing version it is maybe missed. Of course
retitle 240571 plwm-doc: should recommend info-browser, not info-reader
thanks
Hi,
I think it was stated some time ago Moshe is MIA. #240571 is the
single RC bug of his packages, but is a silly bug (recommends a non
existing package). Perhaps this makes it a good candidate for an NMU
(unl
===
★ Felissimoからのお知らせとお願い★
===
メール／フェリシモウェブサイト・お問い合わせ窓口は、勝手ながら、
2004年5月2日（日）より2004年5月5日（水）まで、４日間休業と
させていただいております。
恐れ入りますが、期間中のお問い合わせなどは2004年5月6日以降に
送信してくださいますようお願いいたします。
※本日送信していただきましたお問い合わせにつきましては、
20
Experience a special Mothers Day!
Picture not displaying? See message here.
Stop messages here
ICRVX.v57jk1pmh2T/L2RA41S4OaZ1ekDQ/1oSkvr0dn2rE/ uaxxme rvunzi, tkoby, wgpx . rfrx xsi rxduo, qda, rtlhul . tscqx
xqvg pqkg, ncdn, hntaj . idsw kao yoatun, mzoco, hek . tgr
nbifx syxbw, bphrzv, nxhf
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 02:11:48AM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> Let's see what Fefe will be coming up with, he started thinking about a
> libtinyssl - and I've been thinking about doing libopenpgp for a while.
> are there any interested parties who's like to join and help coding or
> who would pay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please stop cc:ing me. List policy is not to do that, please respect
that.
On Monday 03 May 2004 10.13, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> system. nonetheless, having /sbin/init, the interpreters, basic
> system utilities (fbset, fdisk, e2fsck) verifyable witho
13 matches
Mail list logo
