Hi Filip!
You wrote:
> I was just going through somewhat old (well, not that old, but still) wnpp
> bugs, checking for orphaned packages which appeared to not be developed
> upstream anymore too.
Ah, very nice.
[about gmail]
> I'll leave it as it is, but I suppose if noone has taken over it mig
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2003 16:49:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200050: qa.debian.org: broken links on the Missing
Manpages web page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-04
Severity: normal
Hi,
It seems that the two links in the second paragraph of the Missing
Manpages page [1] are broken.
For the first one, it seems that the pointed server no longer interprets
the cgi page. A replacement could b
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 04:05:51PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 02:18:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > > (and remove that buggy page from the qa webserver :)
> >
> > No. I spotted the recently introduc
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:47:03PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> My bad, I did check an old version of nsd. The lastest did achieve the
> FHS transition. The good point is that I realized it before reopening
> the bug :)
>
> So, I guess that's it, the FHS transition is completed !!
>
> Could som
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 02:18:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[a lot of right thing I did overview]
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > (and remove that buggy page from the qa webserver :)
>
> No. I spotted the recently introduced nsd problem because fhs.html tol
My bad, I did check an old version of nsd. The lastest did achieve the FHS
transition. The good point is that I realized it before reopening the bug :)
So, I guess that's it, the FHS transition is completed !!
Could someone confirm that before I announce the good news to the DWN
authors, please?
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> This page does not seem to be uptodate. It lists 3 packages, and when
> I look further, only one of them seems to still contain /usr/doc or
> /usr/man stuff.
>
> gtklp seems to follow the FHS since version 0.9n-1 (20 Jun 2002)
fhs.
Hello,
This page does not seem to be uptodate. It lists 3 packages, and when I look
further, only one of them seems to still contain /usr/doc or /usr/man stuff.
gtklp seems to follow the FHS since version 0.9n-1 (20 Jun 2002)
siagoffice-common seems also to follow the FHS (diff.gz contains
modif
9 matches
Mail list logo
