Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2003 16:49:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200050: qa.debian.org: broken links on the Missing
Manpages web page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jul 2003 15:22:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 04 10:22:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lns-th2-5f-81-56-229-86.adsl.proxad.net (domix.duboc.net)
[81.56.229.86]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19YSOE-00038X-00; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 10:22:22 -0500
Received: by domix.duboc.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DB9D040006; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 17:21:59 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: broken links on the Missing Manpages web page
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 17:21:59 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-04
Severity: normal
Hi,
It seems that the two links in the second paragraph of the Missing
Manpages page [1] are broken.
For the first one, it seems that the pointed server no longer interprets
the cgi page. A replacement could be [2]
For the second, a link to pod2man page could be [3].
[1] http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html
[2] http://www.linuxcentral.com/linux/man-pages/man.7.html
[3] http://www.perldoc.com/perl5.8.0/bin/pod2man.html
---
Nicolas Duboc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux domix 2.4.20-k7-domix4 #1 jeu fév 20 14:24:37 CET 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 200050-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jul 2003 15:49:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 04 10:49:38 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19YSob-0005gb-00; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 10:49:37 -0500
Received: from host217-35-19-57.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.19.57]
helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by protactinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
id 19YSob-0003vs-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 16:49:37 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 19YSoa-0003po-00; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 16:49:36 +0100
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 16:49:36 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#200050: qa.debian.org: broken links on the Missing Manpages
web page
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 05:21:59PM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote:
> It seems that the two links in the second paragraph of the Missing
> Manpages page [1] are broken.
>
> For the first one, it seems that the pointed server no longer interprets
> the cgi page. A replacement could be [2]
[...]
> [2] http://www.linuxcentral.com/linux/man-pages/man.7.html
That's not up to date, though. http://gmanedit.sourceforge.net/man7.html
seems better.
(It'd be kind of nice if we had our own man page CGI script that could
pick arbitrary pages out of the archive, so that we didn't have to
depend on external sites ...)
> For the second, a link to pod2man page could be [3].
I've fixed both of these in CVS now. The web site will be updated
shortly.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
