So.. just relicense it as GPL.
there's at least one MORE problem with this package, though.
it build-depends on rman (non-free)
tell you what.. i'm just going to go ahead and adopt it, i'll upload
fixed packages shortly.
- brian.
- Forwarded message from Rob 'CmdrTaco' Malda <[EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:33:13PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:28:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've uploaded new packages for asmodem and knews to fix some bugs in these
> > > packages.
> > As I said seve
(cc'd to -qa)
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 05:24:16PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2001, at 2 h 12,
> the keyboard of Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > would you have any objection to this package being removed from the
> > archive?
>
> No. Unless someone
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#68081: Please remove ppd-gs from unstable/testing,
which was filed against the ftp.debian.org package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached bel
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:07:54PM +0100, Eric VB wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I entered the NM queue 6 months ago. I then posted an ITA to adopt the package
> 'crafty'.
>
> My ITA isn't reported on the crafty's bugs list page though. Is it normal ?
listed under pseudopackage "wnpp"
>
> I build a new vers
Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:02:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#86551: fixed in knews 1.0b.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Installing:
oidentd_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/oidentd/oidentd_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
oidentd_1.7.1-2.dsc
to pool/main/o/oidentd/oidentd_1.7.1-2.dsc
oidentd_1.7.1-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/oidentd/oidentd_1.7.1-2.diff.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs:
If t
Installing:
knews_1.0b.1-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/knews/knews_1.0b.1-4_i386.deb
knews_1.0b.1-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/knews/knews_1.0b.1-4.diff.gz
knews_1.0b.1-4.dsc
to pool/main/k/knews/knews_1.0b.1-4.dsc
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 86551
If the ove
Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:44:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line new package version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:07:54PM +0100 , Eric VB wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I entered the NM queue 6 months ago. I then posted an ITA to adopt the package
> 'crafty'.
>
> My ITA isn't reported on the crafty's bugs list page though. Is it normal ?
yes, it's on wnpp bug list
> I build a new version of cr
Hi,
I entered the NM queue 6 months ago. I then posted an ITA to adopt the package
'crafty'.
My ITA isn't reported on the crafty's bugs list page though. Is it normal ?
I build a new version of crafty. The package has been sponsored by tony mancill
and he uploaded my files to pool.
Who will be
Package: hylafax
Severity: serious
This package fails trying to find the tiff libraries. The package needs
to build-dep on libtiff3g-dev.
Ben
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:28:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've uploaded new packages for asmodem and knews to fix some bugs in these
> > packages.
>
> As I said several hours ago,
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa-0102/msg00163.html
I
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:28:19PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've uploaded new packages for asmodem and knews to fix some bugs in these
> packages.
As I said several hours ago,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa-0102/msg00163.html
so..
I've moved the asmodem packages from /incoming to m
Hi,
I've uploaded new packages for asmodem and knews to fix some bugs in these
packages.
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:10:09 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:08:53 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:08:53 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:08:53 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:55:47 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:54:32 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This is already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:48:02AM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> Package: asmodem
> Version: 0.60-8
> Severity: serious
>
> asmodem is missing a build-depends on xutils:
> test -f debian/rules
> xmkmf
> make: xmkmf: Command not found
> make: *** [build
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:28:06AM +, Karl-Martin Skontorp wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Karl-Martin Skontorp wrote:
> > > [... about Crafty ...]
> > >
> > > To the best of my knowledge, it badly needs a maintainer.
> >
> > [.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 09:28:06AM +, Karl-Martin Skontorp wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Karl-Martin Skontorp wrote:
> > > Is the crafty package still orphaned and in need of a new maintainer? I
> > > will probably be updating the deb package for myself anyway, so if a new
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Karl-Martin Skontorp wrote:
> > Is the crafty package still orphaned and in need of a new maintainer? I
> > will probably be updating the deb package for myself anyway, so if a new
> > maintainer is needed I will be happy to apply for that position.
>
> To t
Package: asmodem
Version: 0.60-8
Severity: serious
asmodem is missing a build-depends on xutils:
test -f debian/rules
xmkmf
make: xmkmf: Command not found
make: *** [build] Error 127
Package: saml
Severity: serious
This package fails to build because it is missing a build-dep for
python-dev. Please add it so it can be autobuilt.
Ben
27 matches
Mail list logo
