❦ 3 mars 2017 21:42 -0800, Clint Byrum :
> One great thing about teams is they have many faces. Talk to me. Talk to
> Allison. Talk to others. We're here to make sure things flow smoothly
> for OpenStack and Debian, and if you have disagreements and don't want
> to fight, I get that. Maybe we c
On March 4, 2017 4:46:05 AM EST, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 3 mars 2017 21:42 -0800, Clint Byrum :
>
>> One great thing about teams is they have many faces. Talk to me. Talk
>to
>> Allison. Talk to others. We're here to make sure things flow smoothly
>> for OpenStack and Debian, and if you have
❦ 4 mars 2017 15:04 GMT, Scott Kitterman :
> This was not about isolated mistakes. We've all made those. I do
> not, however, think it's useful to rehash the details. I do think it
> is worth mentioning that since he's back in the team it wasn't without
> limit.
He's back in the team becaus
On 03/04/2017 06:03 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> If you don't understand why, after repeated warnings,
> you were temporarily banned from team repository access,
I understand, but I don't agree. My view is that it went a way too far
and that we all have better things to do than such playground ac
On Saturday, March 04, 2017 09:23:28 PM Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 4 mars 2017 15:04 GMT, Scott Kitterman :
> > This was not about isolated mistakes. We've all made those. I do
> > not, however, think it's useful to rehash the details. I do think it
> > is worth mentioning that since he's back
On March 4, 2017 6:41:13 PM EST, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 03/04/2017 06:03 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> If you don't understand why, after repeated warnings,
>> you were temporarily banned from team repository access,
>
>I understand, but I don't agree. My view is that it went a way too far
>
On 03/04/2017 04:04 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This was not about isolated mistakes.
> [...]
> I do not, however, think it's useful to rehash the details.
Though that's what you're doing.
You don't have a reason to do so, while I do (ie: explain why I would
prefer if packages were not moved to
On Sunday, March 05, 2017 01:26:19 AM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 03/04/2017 04:04 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > This was not about isolated mistakes.
> > [...]
> > I do not, however, think it's useful to rehash the details.
>
> Though that's what you're doing.
>
> You don't have a reason to do s
On 03/04/2017 05:13 AM, Brian May wrote:
> Thomas Goirand writes:
>
>> And I'm not even addressing yet the horrible git-dpm troubles, how
>> many more years the team is forcibly burying every contributor into.
>
> There is discussion on changing this. The consensus seems to be we
> should wait u
On 03/04/2017 06:42 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> That's for _OpenStack_. We're talking about libraries here. Nobody is
> suggesting that DPMT take on Keystone or Horizon.
>
>> Alembic is one piece of the puzzle that may be a source of trouble in
>> OpenStack. Having a package inside the umbrella of th
❦ 4 mars 2017 23:04 GMT, Scott Kitterman :
>> > This was not about isolated mistakes. We've all made those. I do
>> > not, however, think it's useful to rehash the details. I do think it
>> > is worth mentioning that since he's back in the team it wasn't without
>> > limit.
>>
>> He's back
On March 5, 2017 12:33:03 AM EST, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 4 mars 2017 23:04 GMT, Scott Kitterman :
>
>>> > This was not about isolated mistakes. We've all made those. I do
>>> > not, however, think it's useful to rehash the details. I do think
>it
>>> > is worth mentioning that since he's
12 matches
Mail list logo
