On Sunday, March 05, 2017 01:26:19 AM Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 03/04/2017 04:04 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > This was not about isolated mistakes. > > [...] > > I do not, however, think it's useful to rehash the details. > > Though that's what you're doing. > > You don't have a reason to do so, while I do (ie: explain why I would > prefer if packages were not moved to the team). And you're here just > proving me right. > > > I do think it is worth mentioning that since he's back in the team > > it wasn't without limit. > > It's unbelievable to read this. None of the admins accepted to tell what > would be the limit. Vincent explain how I have been re-added. Hopefully, > you're only having difficulties to remember rather than being completely > dishonest here. > > Conclusion of this little thread with Scott: I am right to continue to > distrust this team's admins. I would advise anyone who don't know the > team for so long to also be very careful as well. > > That's *not* hilarious, and I'm not amused,
I wasn't at Debconf, so whatever happened there, I wasn't a part of it. All I know is I was asked to consider re-adding you by one of the other admins and we agreed to it. As far as the rest, we've never even (that I recall/know of) ever discussed banning anyone else. This is absolutely not something anyone needs to worry about and I'd appreciate you knock off the FUD. Scott K
