Re: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I have no idea what makes you think that even more angry mails on public > > mailing list will solve the problem. > Be quiet won't solve it either, sadly. That's proved by the lo

Re: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno mar, 12/01/2010 alle 00.06 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I have no idea what makes you think that even more angry mails on public > > > mailing list will solve

Re: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 00:06 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : > A group hijack is still a hijack. I don't know why you try to make this > sound like some sort of noble enterprise for the good of Debian. It doesn’t have to be noble. But it is often useful nevertheless. -- .''`. Josselin

Re: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:06:09AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > A group hijack is still a hijack. I don't know why you try to make this > sound like some sort of noble enterprise for the good of Debian. I never said it is a noble enterprise. I would simply call it common sense that a group

Re: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote: > Il giorno mar, 12/01/2010 alle 00.06 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > I have no idea what makes yo

Re: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:06, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille wrote: >> > I have no idea what makes you think that even more angry mails on public >> > mailing list will solve the problem. > >> B

Re: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:24:49AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I never said it is a noble enterprise. I was responding to Sandro. > I would simply call it common sense that a group should not allow a single > person to block an important package. After such a long time of ignorance > by not r

Re: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno mar, 12/01/2010 alle 02.37 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote: > > Il giorno mar, 12/01/2010 alle 00.06 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Ja

Re: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:37:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Really? > > Here are some other words that go hand-in-hand with 'package hijack': > > - vigilante > - antisocial > - arrogant > - acrimonious > - disrespectful > - demotivating Are you really sure that these attributes will

Re: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:59:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > As log as you leave it as the maintainer's prerogative to nack the takeover, > then that's fine. Sure. That's what I intended to say when I said: "... if I do not hear from you until 7 days I assume you agree." > > The alterna

Re: Bug#543689: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Bastian Venthur
On 12.01.2010 03:08, Mr. Foobarra wrote: > (CC'd, since it is not obvious to the casual bystander if Matthias > reads bug reports or mailing lists) > > Dear Mr. Klose, > > I have grown woefully tired of watching respected developers ask > nicely, tiptoe around, get angry, ask again after waiting

Re: Bug#543689: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:21:34PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: > The information is there, it is unfortunately just well hidden: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/12/msg00207.html Ahh, that's a good catch. I can not tell whether the technical arguing is correct but at least it gi

Re: Bug#543689: please upload python2.6 to unstable

2010-01-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 13:44, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:21:34PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: >> The information is there, it is unfortunately just well hidden: >> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/12/msg00207.html > > Ahh, that's a good catch.  I can not tell

Re: Bug#561316: postr: diff for NMU version 0.12.3-1.1

2010-01-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Ross, On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:10, Ross Burton wrote: > On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 23:30 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Please also consider joining the PAPT [1] and maintain the package with us. >> >> [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonAppsPackagingTeam/ > > I was previously the upstream maint