* Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) [100915 01:53]:
> In experimental you'll find a set of packages for Python3
>
> python3.1 3.1.2+20100909-1
> python3.2 3.2~a2-4
> python3-defaults 3.1.2-10
> python-defaults 2.6.6-2
> distribute 0.6.14-3
For reference, since I was asked on IRC: As nobod
On Fr, 2010-09-17 at 13:36 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 17/09/10 13:29, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > On Fr, 2010-09-17 at 13:09 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> >> [Julian Andres Klode, 2010-09-17]
> >>> The python-apt package provides python3-apt, I see no reason in adding a
> >>> ne
.oO(damn, someone was happy with status quo. Why didn't he speak up before
and didn't convince unhappy ones ;)
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7
On 17/09/10 13:29, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Fr, 2010-09-17 at 13:09 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> [Julian Andres Klode, 2010-09-17]
>>> The python-apt package provides python3-apt, I see no reason in adding a
>>> new package here.
>>
>> how about this one: on my phone, I want to install a
On Fr, 2010-09-17 at 13:09 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Julian Andres Klode, 2010-09-17]
> > The python-apt package provides python3-apt, I see no reason in adding a
> > new package here.
>
> how about this one: on my phone, I want to install application written
> in Python 3 that uses apt mod
[Julian Andres Klode, 2010-09-17]
> The python-apt package provides python3-apt, I see no reason in adding a
> new package here.
how about this one: on my phone, I want to install application written
in Python 3 that uses apt module, after installing python3-apt package,
I suddenly have python2 an
On Mi, 2010-09-15 at 01:53 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> In experimental you'll find a set of packages for Python3
>
>python3.1 3.1.2+20100909-1
>python3.2 3.2~a2-4
>python3-defaults 3.1.2-10
>python-defaults 2.6.6-2
>distribute 0.6.14-3
>
> The python3.2 package has the PEP'
[Sandro Tosi, 2010-09-16]
> Something I didn't find written anywhere and makes me wonder is:
> what's the gain for squeeze to have those new packages? is 3.1 being a
> supported version depending on those packages or viceversa? (after
> all, why have 3.1 as supported without any modules?)
Please r
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:53, Matthias Klose wrote:
> In experimental you'll find a set of packages for Python3
>
> python3.1 3.1.2+20100909-1
> python3.2 3.2~a2-4
> python3-defaults 3.1.2-10
> python-defaults 2.6.6-2
> distribute 0.6.14-3
>
> The python3.2 package has the PEP's 3147
In experimental you'll find a set of packages for Python3
python3.1 3.1.2+20100909-1
python3.2 3.2~a2-4
python3-defaults 3.1.2-10
python-defaults 2.6.6-2
distribute 0.6.14-3
The python3.2 package has the PEP's 3147 (PYC Repository Directories)
[1] and 3149 (ABI version tagged .so files
10 matches
Mail list logo
