On Fr, 2010-09-17 at 13:36 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 17/09/10 13:29, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > On Fr, 2010-09-17 at 13:09 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > >> [Julian Andres Klode, 2010-09-17] > >>> The python-apt package provides python3-apt, I see no reason in adding a > >>> new package here. > >> > >> how about this one: on my phone, I want to install application written > >> in Python 3 that uses apt module, after installing python3-apt package, > >> I suddenly have python2 and my SD card is almost full. What should I do? > > Buy a larger phone/SD. > > Huh. Would you be happy if the python maintainers made the python package > depend > on python2.4, python2.5, python2.6 and python3.1?
python depends on the default Python version, python-* packages in contrast include multiple versions. The equivalent would be python-all, and I would not be unhappy if it depended on python3.1 (or python3-all). -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1284724835.2321.13.ca...@jak-thinkpad
