[Julian Andres Klode, 2010-09-17] > The python-apt package provides python3-apt, I see no reason in adding a > new package here.
how about this one: on my phone, I want to install application written in Python 3 that uses apt module, after installing python3-apt package, I suddenly have python2 and my SD card is almost full. What should I do? > Given that we already have py3k support in the > python-apt package, we would need to depend on python3-apt anyway, so > adding a separate package is not useful. it is, see above > I am in general not happy about the decision to treat python3 as totally > separate from python. The first python3 releases in experimental were > just a normal new version (with some exceptions), now it's like a > completely different language; resulting in hacking the build system to > get things work correctly that worked perfectly well in the beginning. please join us, add Python 3 support to python-central and python-support (warning: you cannot share files with python2), fix all upgrade problems we currently have with both of them, design it in a way that 3rd party module authors will not complain and make it easy to developers who package Python occasionally (i.e. will not ask you about pyshared every week) and we'll love you :-) -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100917110935.gc26...@piotro.eu
