Le Fri, May 11, 2012 at 07:54:51AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:24:22AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> I have now:
>
> - Deleted all the parts related to pv-grub.
>
> - Reverted the removal of the dpkg diversion of ureadahead.
>(Tracking the issue in
>
On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:48:07 AM Ana Guerrero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering how feasible is removing Qt3 from wheezy. Even if
> we freeze soon, removing packages is never a problem :-)
>
> One of the big parts of the effort would be removing python-qt3, there are
> only 6 packages in the ar
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:21:53PM +0200, Bjørn Ove Grøtan wrote:
>
> If anyone are interested in sponsoring Luma, please take a look at the
> package uploaded
> to mentors.debian.net - and contact Per or me.
>
I will take a look. Please check the BTS and make sure you address the bugs
there tha
hi,
thanks for analyzing the situation.
> I'm considering how feasible is removing Qt3 from wheezy. Even if
> we freeze soon, removing packages is never a problem :-)
>
> One of the big parts of the effort would be removing python-qt3, there are
> only 6 packages in the archive currently using p
Ana Guerrero:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering how feasible is removing Qt3 from wheezy. Even if
> we freeze soon, removing packages is never a problem :-)
>
> One of the big parts of the effort would be removing python-qt3, there are
> only 6 packages in the archive currently using python-qt3:
>
> * P
Hi,
I'm considering how feasible is removing Qt3 from wheezy. Even if
we freeze soon, removing packages is never a problem :-)
One of the big parts of the effort would be removing python-qt3, there are
only 6 packages in the archive currently using python-qt3:
* Package: kodos (#604359) It seems
6 matches
Mail list logo
