Ana Guerrero: > Hi, > > I'm considering how feasible is removing Qt3 from wheezy. Even if > we freeze soon, removing packages is never a problem :-) > > One of the big parts of the effort would be removing python-qt3, there are > only 6 packages in the archive currently using python-qt3: > > * Package: luma (#604358) Upstream started the Qt4 migration > but seems dead.
QT4 migration is done in version 3.0. A beta was released Q2-2011. Luma 3.0 has a package up for sponsorship at mentors.debian.net. The project webpage hasn't been updated much and therefore project can seem as dead, but just hasn't gotten the tender loving care it deserves. > (The maintainers of all those packages have been bcc'ed, please answer to > debian-python@ if you have something to say). > > Is it worth keeping python-qt3 and therefore Qt3 (that does not have any > maintainer) in Debian only for those apps? Are the python-qt3 maintainers > willing > to continue with the python-qt3 maintenance wrt upstream work? If anyone are interested in sponsoring Luma, please take a look at the package uploaded to mentors.debian.net - and contact Per or me. -- Regards Bjørn Ove Grøtan Previous maintainer of Luma, and current upstream project manager -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120518102153.gm21...@samfundet.no
