On 01/10/2011 11:19 AM, sefie-janvier.ouatt...@cegetel.net wrote:
> Bonjour
>
> Si vous avez une bonne connexion internet
>
> Allez ici : http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/project/build/
>
> vous aurez les cd/dvd des version disponible depuis le site officiel de
> Debian
I'm fairly sure that'
On 03/04/2011 12:46 PM, dos4ever wrote:
> Hello I checked the FAQ and did not find the answer to this question:
> Why 7 install iso files at 4.4G & 1 at 842M =31Gb.
> I would hope that disk 1 is all that is needed to install the OS and the
> rest are programs?
> If they are all needed to install t
On 06/08/11 07:32 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 14:36 -0400, Denny Nebgen wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul, I downloaded and burned an iso image cd of debian and when I
>> ran the cd, the only options were to install and not run live. My first
>> experience with Debian linux so, I may be misin
On 30/09/11 08:55 PM, Qactuar Rogue wrote:
> I did nothing, just kindly asked for help regarding partitioning.
As I saw it, you lead by implying the channel is at least partly
populated by dumbasses. That did not get you off to a good start.
As for what transpired in PM, that's strictly between y
On 06/06/2012 01:08 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think there may be information in people's non-normalised votes.
> For example on the diversity ballot `-2' seems to say `I'd rather just
> forget about this' in a way that `-1' doesn't.
Or "my mail client broke my vote and I didn't catch it and fix i
On 06/06/2012 01:57 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> My vote of '12' was rendered precisely as '-2' by icedove 10 and 11 + enigma
> 1.4 and 1.4.1
oops, enigmail*, of course
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On 08/01/2012 11:41 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> \item You cannot use DEBIAN trademarks in a domain name, with or without
>> commercial intent.
>
> So debian.mirror.my.org is illegal?
Hmm, 'debian' is the default live hostname. That's a lot of potential
infringements ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/13/2012 05:10 AM, Philip Hands wrote:
> While contrasting with Ubuntu, there is also the issue of Debian Live CDs
> which are close to
> impossible to find, and if you eventually manage to find them, turn out to be
> too big to fit on
> a CD.
On 08/22/2012 09:36 AM, Alberto Fuentes wrote:
> what would be nice its one image installer/live-cd like ubuntu does :>
>
> Why is not done like that yet? sorry if this was already discussed
Huh? The live images include an installer. Or did I miss your meaning?
As for "one image" (if you meant,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/21/2012 09:05 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Along the same lines, I suggest to simplify the choices according to the ways
> of acquiring
> Debian that are more likely for users. The suggestion is implemented in the
> attached patch:
>
> - it
On 10/30/2012 08:05 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Paul Wise, 2012-10-30]
>> http://wiki.debian.org/PlanetDebian#What_Can_I_Post_On_Planet
>
> and this part is written in stone and we cannot change it?
I doubt if you would find many supporters to change it.
> Anyway, I don't care that much, as sa
On 03/11/2014 07:18 AM, Olivier Berger wrote:
> I guess the whole site is in CVS, and one could find some history, but
> maybe there could be some easier way...
Yes. I guess it's a bit ugly to look at the wml sources, but it is all here:
See https://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs and spec
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:17:46 +0200
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder what is it that we do wrong to spread this confusion so much that it
> affects even Debian developers themselves.
>
> What is this to blame? Would it be the FTP archive layout? Perhaps having an
> unified BTS?
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:17:46 +0200
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder what is it that we do wrong to spread this confusion so much that it
> affects even Debian developers themselves.
>
> What is this to blame? Would it be the FTP archive layout? Perhaps having an
> unified BTS?
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:36:17 +0200
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Therefore Lenny is not Debian, but a superset of it?
>
> This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
I have never understood this to be the case. Our codenames refer to
Debian releases. Both
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:17:20 +0200
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to make it clear, please don't take it as if I were recriminating
> something to you. My understanding is that this problem is about general
> perception and I don't think it's your fault in any way.
I understand th
Some good points here, but can we please continue this on
debian-project and stop cross-posting to debian-devel?
Thanks,
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:20:03 +0200
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The pattern I see is that some people complain about my message being harsh
> by sending replies that are outright insulting.
>
> I think the reason you (and the other minority of bashers in this thread) are
> annoyed is
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:08:56 +0200
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did. It's obvious I didn't consider them well enough, but I assure you
> when I added 'Friendly' there (which is not part of my usual signature) I was
> considering the personal factors.
This was a thin cloak for words
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:06:56PM +0200, Lars Bahner wrote:
> I was just wondering if commonly used project name, ie. ``Debian
> GNU/Linux'' is starting to be somewhat misleading?
Commonly used by whom? As a project, we are Debian. What the
project produces are these OSes:
> * Debian GNU
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:30:38PM +0200, Lars Bahner wrote:
> From http://www.debian.org/index.html
>
> Debian GNU/Linux -- The Universal Operating System
Like I said. That's one of the OSes we produce. It's our front runner,
and therefor in the main page title. I think it is appropriate. (I
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:06:45PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> No, the Hurd is only the user-extensible operating system
> and as such potentially universal (but in that even more so then Linux
> ever will be). Nevermind ;)
Ah, so we could change it is a statement of faith? :)
> As far as m
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:58:22PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Isao Nagamori wrote:
> > Hello Debian Organization,
> >
> >
> > My Name is isao nagamori at Motorola (Japan) SPS sales FAE.
> > I want to know information about Debian product which is ported for
> > embedded platform
> > such as
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 01:35:04PM +0900, Isao Nagamori wrote:
> So, reading home page (http://emdebian.sourceforge.net/news.htm),
> my understanding is that debian is trying to port Linux to embedded hardware.
Well, not entirely correct. The footnote at the bottom of the home page
says:
Hi,
I have been speaking with Doug Loss and Roger Dingeldine of SEUL/edu
(see www.seul.org/edu) about a coalition they are forming, the purpose
of which will be to promote free software and free content in education.
I feel Debian and this coalition, which to date is being called
the Schoolforge[
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 05:55:27PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I would like the fundraising notices on OPN to stop. Hundreds and thousands
> Debian users are not subject to such things in the rest of Debian, they
> should not be subject to it when they join IRC looking for help in #debian.
>
> I t
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 07:48:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On 20 Apr 2003, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> > OK, thanks. Here (http://people.debian.org/~terminus/debian-lex/) is a
> > rough Web page which I have shamelessly plagiarised from your Debian-Med
> > project.
> I just builded the Debian-me
27 matches
Mail list logo
