I am not using your OS but I am encountering a strange bug on my computer that
says I am. When I try to navigate to en.wikipedia.org
this is the page I encounter.
You should replace this page with your own web pages as soon as possible.Unless
you changed its configuration, your new server is co
OK, so, based on this feedback, I've reënabled the feed, and I'm
unlikely to remove it again without good reason.
-Evan
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Correction: it looks like Planet is smart enough to trim out old posts
automatically.
-Evan
--
Evan Prodromou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://evan.prodromou.name/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 08:26 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> BTW CCing Evan to let him know.
Thanks, Raphael.
I've heard from people who really like reading my blog posts on Planet
Debian, and people who really hate them.
The people who like my blog can add it to their feed readers dir
ry or Free alternative.
Debian has a huge pool of such loyal and responsive users. Squandering
that resource is a bad idea.
~Evan
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Debian Project (http://www.debian.org/)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
reciate the specifics.
> I guess you didn't want to answer the question of whether the same
> labelling scheme could work for both.
I think it's an orthogonal issue, but, sure, I think it could work for
both.
~Evan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-19-05 at 07:27 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [...] http://evan.prodromou.name/CC_Licence_Distinctions
>
> I think some of that is shooting at shadows, some is hyperbole
> and some is contentious:
You're free to think
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
So: if there's a public statement by Debian or debian-legal on a
license (like http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary is now), would
it be misleading for an organization to point to that statement?
Especially if it was clear that the review and approval was n
a public statement by Debian or
debian-legal on a license (like http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary
is now), would it be misleading for an organization to point to that
statement? Especially if it was clear that the review and approval was
not an endorsement of the organization or their goals
Sorry, I meant "late spring", not "late summer".
~Evan
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Debian Project (http://www.debian.org/)
So, here's what's been going on with the Debian-CC working group: we had a number of exchanges back and forth in the late summer, culminating in a draft license in early June. I pushed it too close to my wife's due date in making the response, and I've been dealing with a new baby in the last m
Hey [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Speed up your dialup connection 5 times!
Find out more:
1clickunlimited.com
Thank you,
Micah McCarthy
blue apple brown strawberry
3. 3.
cyan apple yellow mango
Wasn't Dick missing talking on the street?. I didn't love dancing for two hours..
types of content for games, Web applications, educational
stuff, desktop themes and backgrounds, dot dot dot.
Not all non-program software is documentation, after all. And not all
documentation is plain text.
~Evan
* OK, I'm not sure about video... but I figure it won't be long
f it would be a good idea to ask "official"-ish mirror
operators to provide some contact information for the public that could
be added to the mirrors list for occasions such as these.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
>>>>> "SB" == Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Or perhaps they are simply a loud and annoying minority, which
>> is what I suspect.
SB> Minorities are always annoying.
The worst part being that they're usually right.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e" and
AS> "respectful", for all values of "your". I find yours to be
AS> pretty much the opposite.
I haven't told you my notions of politeness and respect.
On my side, I find your point, that we should be forthright about
technical and organizational problems, entirely reasonable. I'd rebut
that we don't need to act like surly teens all the time in order to do
that.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ould, if I knew that
you thought that dogs and women were equally unfit for tasks that
require intelligence, like voting or being a DD.
But I don't know that, and I suspect you don't think that.
JW> Maybe try showing some respect for people other than yourself.
That sounds like a great plan.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
without calling the guy holding
it a spade-holding fuckwit and kicking mud on his shoes.
~ESP
* By the way, I don't count myself in this number. I have a crappy
temper, and I'm not any great shakes as a Debian contributor. I try
to live up to what I'm saying here, but any sea
ter operating system.
That's not "plain stupid". That's common sense.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t; with discrimination!
Let me get this straight: are you really comparing having female DDs
to letting a dog vote? Like, one is as ridiculous as the other?
~ESP
- --
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAXq2oozwefHAKBVER
o reframe the question as: non-free
is a non-Debian project that we've hosted and supported for
years. We're just revisiting whether we'll continue doing that.
~ESP
- --
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAV21pozwefHAKBVERAkRMAKDUpi638bIofNxlycZZqAry/oogSwCcDpDp
G11NxjBWu/Uz4qn/FLQMbaE=
=iA47
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
decided as to whether I would bother to contribute to
HM> non-free.org if Suffield's GR passes.
Well, what you do with your own time is your business. I'm just asking
that you don't use Debian machines and infrastructure to do your
non-Debian projects.
~ESP
- --
Evan Prodrom
ver to -project in the (perhaps vain) hope
to see it transition to where it's more on-topic.
- --
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAVnEnozwefHAKBVERAsR9AKCbFA10YgovyYF3AxLHkRum/RbwvwCeMURT
P9g+axceKHFKhDK234V8RiU=
=hNdI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
s
* contrib gets in incorporated into main, with dangling
dependencies
Was it left out on purpose, so this decision could be made later?
~ESP
- --
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So, am I correct in saying that the fate of the "contrib" section is
unspecified in the current GR?
~ESP
- --
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4
I think it's a good idea, too.
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ist line, and then forget it.
So, users who want non-free packages are covered. They plug into
Debian easily. They don't get the rest of Debian infrastructure (QA,
BTS, mirror network, developer community, yadda yadda), but that's the
whole point of removing non-free. If there
27 matches
Mail list logo
