On Wednesday 01 June 2005 22:31, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> > >
> > >
>
> This company does not have a phone number listed in Directory
> Assistance, and the number given is "no longer in service".
>
> > >
> > >
>
> NNL Software does not have a phone number listed in Directory
> Assistance, and
Hi,
as there haven't been any more comments about the new policy for one week,
I've updated the webpage accordingly.
Thanks to everyone who has participated in the discussion.
--
Tobias
Recursion: n., see Recursion.
pgpr2FO3xSwSE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I think we should rephrase item #1, it sounds quite harsh right now.
Furthermore, I suggest to drop the second item of the policy, because its
motivation was that every consultant has to list two other means of
contact, chosen from the list. We've dropped that requirement, so I think
that
On Thursday 10 February 2005 19:42, Luk Claes wrote:
> > I've removed the controversal bits (website and nearest city) from the
> > policy. Would this version be alright to use?
>
> No, because than the 'Some parts of the consultant's information can be
> removed if they don't comply with this poli
Hi,
I've removed the controversal bits (website and nearest city) from the
policy. Would this version be alright to use?
Policy for Debian's consultants page
1. Mandatory contact information
Working e-mail address (reply within four weeks at maximum)
M
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 21:35, Nick Phillips wrote:
> > 3. Website
> > If an URL is provided, the consultant must mention their
> > Debian-related work on the website. The Debian distribution must be
> > mentioned explicitly, together with a link to www.debian.org.
>
> There was clearly no c
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 23:30, MJ Ray wrote:
> Tobias wrote:
> > there hasn't been any more input to this thread for quite a while now,
> > so I gathered all opinions expressed so far and did a (partial) rewrite
> > of the new policy for the consultants webpage.
>
> This very-slight rewrite doe
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 18:24, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.08.1737 +0100]:
> > The consultant should include a region where they reside (this is
> > probably the nearest big city in most cases), so that the
> >
Hi,
there hasn't been any more input to this thread for quite a while now, so I
gathered all opinions expressed so far and did a (partial) rewrite of the
new policy for the consultants webpage.
There has been much discussion about the requirement of a link back to
www.d.o on the consultant's w
Hi,
back in November 2004, Noèl Köthe came up with a suggestion for a policy
regarding the addition of entries to the Debian consultants list [1]. There
has been a discussion about his proposal, and quite a few people
contributed valuable additions to the policy.
We, the team sitting behind [E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 June 2004 17:42, Michael Banck wrote:
> We're in #debian.de on OFTC. Unfortunately, we're mostly done now and I
> did not have time to look at your changes. I've put an updated version
> of the flyer up at the original URL. I'll try to loo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 June 2004 17:11, Michael Banck wrote:
> I'm terribly sorry, it seems GMX believes you're a SPAM relay. This is
> the first time I've had a problem with it.
Now this is strange; I'm using GMX as my mail host.
> > Please find the updated G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 June 2004 14:14, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 01:08:36PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> > Does the German version get printed, too? In that case, there are some
> > issues with it as well. It's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On Friday 11 June 2004 11:18, Michael Banck wrote:
> I've updated the Debian flyer[1] for this year's LinuxTag. As we are
> going to hand out Sarge-DVDs anyway and in order to make it a bit more
> current and future-proof, I've based the conten
14 matches
Mail list logo
