On Thursday 10 February 2005 19:42, Luk Claes wrote: > > I've removed the controversal bits (website and nearest city) from the > > policy. Would this version be alright to use? > > No, because than the 'Some parts of the consultant's information can be > removed if they don't comply with this policy anymore.' is too weak > unless there is mentioned that the consultant with an URL has to explain > his/her consultant work on that URL, IMHO.
Hi,
should we just drop that part as well, then? Or do you have another
suggestion?
Cheers,
--
Tobias
Never trust a man who can count to 1023 on his fingers.
pgpRKnIEI2hl8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
