Miles Fidelman writes:
> Getting past all the obfuscatory count and counterpoint, there seem to
> be two clear questions on the table:
> 1. Given a piece of FOSS client software, that has no purpose other
> than to interface with a proprietary back-end service (say a FOSS
> twitter GUI), should
"Dr. Bas Wijnen" writes:
> Also, I don't want to move lots of software to contrib. I would much
> rather have it fixed by removing the support for the non-free services,
> or by having plugin systems that allow only the non-free-interfacing
> part to be in contrib.
I believe this would be hugel
Hi all
El 13/08/17 a las 21:28, Sotirios Vrachas escribió:
>> 3) Members: the job that our team does is quite taxing and in order to be
>> responsive we would like to have new members, and work on a rotational
>> basis (i.e. two or three years of term, not forever) to avoid burn-out.
>> Additional
On 8/13/17 1:05 PM, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
My purpose of this thread (which is a question asked elsewhere) is to find out
if there is consensus about this issue. If there isn't, I don't want to bother
everyone with a mass bug report. Which, as Russ pointed out, would be a pretty
large operation
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 13 2017, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> 4) Name: we find that "anti harassment" is not a great name both
> because it's negative and because it puts people on edge when we
> contact them. We asked people to suggest other names. The current
> best suggestion that we have is "Res
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 12:07:51PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 12 août 2017 09:12 GMT, "Dr. Bas Wijnen" :
> > No, it doesn't. 2.2.1 says "None of the packages in the main archive area
> > require software outside of that area to function." In other words, if
> > software outside of main wo
> 3) Members: the job that our team does is quite taxing and in order to be
> responsive we would like to have new members, and work on a rotational
> basis (i.e. two or three years of term, not forever) to avoid burn-out.
> Additionally, we believe that we need extra training to be better prepared
>> 4) Name: we find that "anti harassment" is not a great name both because
>> it's negative and because it puts people on edge when we contact
them. We
>> asked people to suggest other names. The current best suggestion that we
>> have is "Respect & Inclusion team" with resp...@debian.org as the
On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 17:11 +0200, Margarita Manterola wrote:
[...]
> 4) Name: we find that "anti harassment" is not a great name both because
> it's negative and because it puts people on edge when we contact them. We
> asked people to suggest other names. The current best suggestion that we
> h
During DebConf17 there was a BOF about the Anti-Harassment team. You can
find links to slides, text, video and collaborative pad of the discussion
in our wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/AntiHarassment .
We presented a status report of the issues that had been handled during the
past year as wel
10 matches
Mail list logo
