Bug#653062: hplip: p-makeuri does not resolve FQDN => could add only local printer

tags 653062 - moreinfo tags 653062 + confirmed thanks This is still an issue On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Brian Potkin wrote: > tags 653062 moreinfo > thanks > > > > On Fri 23 Dec 2011 at 12:20:10 +0100, bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > >> Package: hplip >&g

Bug#729709: ghostscript: ps2epsi to stdout

control: tags -1 + unreproducible control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Friday 15 November 2013 17:33:21 you wrote: > Package: ghostscript > Version: 9.05~dfsg-8 > Severity: wishlist Does ps2epsi infile.ps does this ? Or do you means ps2eps? in this case cat file.ps | ps2eps work Bastien > > Dear

Bug#727758: cups segfaults in libdbus

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:57 AM, wrote: > Package: cups > Version: 1.6.3-1 > Followup-For: Bug #727758 > > Hi, > i also got > > cupsd[3263]: segfault at 0 ip b75776c2 sp bfad0070 error 4 in > libdbus-1.so.3.7.5[b755+49000] > Could you try to get information about instruction address at b757

Bug#729357: cups: Does not print remotely.

control: tags -1 + moreinfo control: tags -1 +unreproducible Could you try the step documented at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Sthu wrote: > Package: cups > Version: 1.6.3-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I believe it happened

Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05

Le 28 août 2013 11:28, "Jonas Smedegaard" a écrit : > > Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 09:41:53) > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 07:32:21) > >>> Le 25 août 2013 21:10, &q

Bug#496070: [ghostscript] opentypefont

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2013-08-27 07:35:20) >> There are three slightly different versions of these fonts installed >> on a Debian system: >> 1) gsfonts >> 2) ghostscript [*] >> 3) texlive-fonts-recommended >> >> The gsfonts package co

Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05

Le 25 août 2013 21:10, "Jonas Smedegaard" a écrit : > > Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-25 20:35:55) > > On 08/25/2013 08:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03) > > >> GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken > > >> from the system,

Bug#496070: [ghostscript] opentypefont

Le 27 août 2013 18:57, "Fabian Greffrath" a écrit : > > Am Dienstag, den 27.08.2013, 18:11 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > > How about package name fonts-base35-urw? That indicating both a) the > > aim of the bundle and b) the owner/maintainer of it. > > We actually have a font packaging policy

Bug#641267: [cups] PS/2 stops working on cups startup

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Brian Potkin wrote: > tags 641267 moreinfo > thanks > > > On Mon 12 Sep 2011 at 10:28:18 +0200, florian...@gmx.at wrote: > >> Hi, > > Hello Florian. > > [Snip] > >> In the past year the problem showed up from time to time, letting the >> PS/2 work some times, than

Bug#718895: cups-filters: /usr/share/cups/data/default-testpage.pdf and transparency

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Stefan Nagy wrote: >> Could you join the inkscape source ? > > I'll attach a slightly different version of the default-testpage.pdf and > its Inkscape SVG. > >> And add some text below the logo ? > > Yes, sure. The nec plus ultra will be to have rule at every the

Bug#718895: cups-filters: /usr/share/cups/data/default-testpage.pdf and transparency

Could you join the inkscape source ? And add some text below the logo ? Bastien On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Stefan Nagy wrote: > Hi Brian, > > I had a look at this bug report now and I'd like to contribute a vector > graphic version of your default test page. The template is smaller (20.

Bug#720078: multiarch ijs

control: tag -1 +patch On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:46 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: > Package: ijs > Version: 0.35-8 > > This patch can make ijs multiarch. > > -- > YunQiang Su >

Bug#702673: PostScript drivers won't work for HP LaserJet 1200

Likely effect of transparency. Bastien Le 8 août 2013 17:51, "Brian Potkin" a écrit : > On Sat 03 Aug 2013 at 09:11:31 +0100, Brian Potkin wrote: > > > Correct me if I have lost sight of the essential point of this report, > > but it seems to come down to "Printing a test page on an HP Laserjet

Bug#717596: cups: Jessie deserves a new HOWTO_BUGREPORT.txt?

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Brian Potkin wrote: > Package: cups > Version: 1.6.3-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > > Following my query about a new HOWTO_BUGREPORT.txt in #714852 there > hasn't been any negative reaction. So I went ahead and did one. :) > > Well, a couple actually. On

Bug#716830: Wrong colors are printed on arm device using hpcups

th driver HP Photosmart 3200 Series, > hpcups 3.13.4 > my laptop is running 1.5.4 with driver HP Photosmart 3200 Series hpijs, > 3.12.11 > > the data sent from the arm box is a lot smaller. > > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES > wrote: >> >

Bug#716830: Wrong colors are printed on arm device using hpcups

hts? > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Adam Pigg wrote: >> >> Certainly >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Adam Pigg wrote: >>> &g

Bug#716965: ps2ps: Copyright (C) 2010 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved.

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Package: ghostscript > Version: 8.71~dfsg2-9+squeeze1 > Severity: important > > For some reason ps2ps creates copyrighted output. Steps: > > $ convert -depth 16 -size 74x79 -colorspace gray xc:white /tmp/test.ps > $ identify /tmp/test.ps

Bug#716830: Wrong colors are printed on arm device using hpcups

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Adam Pigg wrote: > Package: printer-driver-hpcups > Version: 3.13.4-1+b1 > > On a custom built NAS using the armv5tel architecture i have setup cups as a > print server. > > The printer details/configuration are: > Description:HP Photosmart 3200 series > Drive

Bug#632630: can confirm

control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Irmhild Rogalla wrote: > System: Debian Sid on AMD64 > Printer: Kyocera taskalfa 250 ci > Cups-Version: 1.6.2-10 > > Since ca.7-10 days cups doesn't work correct: > First printing is totally unable; than, after an update, priniting is

Bug#716843: cups: CUPS doesn't properly initialize Lexmark E238

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Mark Small wrote: > Package: cups > Version: 1.5.3-5 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > After upgrading my print server to Wheezy, I've had a lot of problems printing > on my Lexmark E238 laser printer. Do you means it is a regression ? If so, it will be

Bug#711229: missing dependency: libnss-mdns for actually using printers discovered with mdns

Le 7 juil. 2013 19:48, "Ben Armstrong" a écrit : > > Package: cups-browsed > Version: 1.0.34-3 > Followup-For: Bug #711229 > > I understand that in the normal case this is fixed. I guess I'm > abnormal, as I didn't happen to have libnss-mdns, even though I already > have avahi-daemon and normally

Bug#712015: cups-filters: cups-pdf produces ugly pdfs through its pixelated font

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:16 PM, James Cloos wrote: >>>>>> "BR" == Bastien ROUCARIES writes: > > BR> It seems that by default cups-ppd use postscript 2 level only (see > BR> /usr/share/ppd/cups-pdf/CUPS-PDF.ppd) > > BR> Could you try to replac

Bug#682426: cups: filter gs takes several minutes consuming 100 % of CPU

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Till Kamppeter > wrote: >> The problem is indeed Cairo, which creates a full-page transparency >> layer even for small images. This happens also very often when printing >> PDF

Bug#682426: cups: filter gs takes several minutes consuming 100 % of CPU

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Till Kamppeter wrote: > The problem is indeed Cairo, which creates a full-page transparency > layer even for small images. This happens also very often when printing > PDFs with evince, as evince re-renders the output with Cairo instead of > passing the input PDF

Bug#712512: foomatic-db: Brother HL1250 failures after first page

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:44 AM, ael wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:37:20PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> Does a postscript driver exist for this printer ? >> Le 16 juin 2013 17:57, "ael" a écrit : >> >> > >> > Hl1250 using Brother H

Bug#682426: Success!

Le 14 juin 2013 19:33, "Dominique Brazziel" a écrit : Could you report the bug against ghostscript upstream and post the bug tracker link to upstream here. > In my case I was able to print a larger pdf > (~700k, 23 pages) reasonably quickly by performing > the following two steps before i

Bug#712512: Ghostscript maybe?

Le 16 juin 2013 23:08, "ael" a écrit : > > IIAR, ghostscript is used to translate into PCL, so I guess this bug > could perhaps come from there? Surelly. Could you debug by following the Ubuntu wiki about printing problem? > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.

Bug#712105:

Coule y ou try un thèse case to post thé error log un debug mode for a good and bad case Le 15 juin 2013 03:54, "Tom Maneiro" a écrit : > OK, followed the tips outlined in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/** > DebuggingPrintingProblems > > First, this is

Bug#712015: cups-filters: cups-pdf produces ugly pdfs through its pixelated font

d > d00109-001 can be opened successfully, and it looks very good. > I convert it into a PDF with ps2pdf. the PDF looks neat too. > > In a short word, all the PS in /var/spool/cups look very good; all the PDF > in ~/PDF look ugly. In the attachment, you can find > > d00107-001, the

Bug#712105: foomatic-filters: foomatic-rip fails when using bjc250gs driver

control: tags -1 + moreinfo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAbKtap9P0==tAFdOU9=v6usdf7qdmc-u5tvcycj5rx...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#712105: foomatic-filters: foomatic-rip fails when using bjc250gs driver

control: tags -1 + morinfo control: severity -1 important On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Tom Maneiro wrote: > Package: foomatic-filters > Version: 4.0.17-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I have a good old Canon BJC-250 printer that I've been using for years on

Bug#712015: cups-filters: cups-pdf produces ugly pdfs through its pixelated font

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:58 AM, 王晓林 wrote: > Sorry, it seems the attached "error_log" file was silently removed by gmail. > It's pasted here: Could you get the pribnt job data as explained here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems section Capturing print job data Could you also t

Bug#712015: cups-filters: cups-pdf produces ugly pdfs through its pixelated font

It seems that by default cups-ppd use postscript 2 level only (see /usr/share/ppd/cups-pdf/CUPS-PDF.ppd) Could you try to replace LanguageLevel: "2" by LanguageLevel : "3" Bastien On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Brian Potkin wrote: > On Wed 12 Jun 2013 at 23:40:31 +0800, 王晓林 wrote: > >> That's

Bug#712015: Fwd: Bug#712015: cups-filters: cups-pdf produces ugly pdfs through its pixelated font

Hi, Bastien Thanks for the quick reply. With this email, I attach a 'good' PDF file generated before my last system upgrade for your reference. Also the 'bad' one is attached again after cropped. Hope they help. Xiaolin -- 王晓林 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Bast

Bug#712015: cups-filters: cups-pdf produces ugly pdfs through its pixelated font

control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Xiaolin Wang wrote: > Package: cups-filters > Version: 1.0.34-3 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** > >* What led up to the situation? > >I oftenly use 'p

Bug#712015: cups-filters: cups-pdf produces ugly pdfs through its pixelated font

control: tag - 1 + moreinfo Could you join original ps file, bad pdf file, and a good pdf file ? Bastien On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Xiaolin Wang wrote: > Package: cups-filters > Version: 1.0.34-3 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > *** Please consider answering these questions, wher

Bug#682426: gs using excessive memory, triggers kswapd storm

Control: tag -1 more info Could you join the PDF? Le 6 juin 2013 22:09, "Dominique Brazziel" a écrit : > I have been hit extremely hard by this bug for about a month > or two now, but it certainly wasn't present in the past. On my > system the GUI completely freezes, the clock on the top p

Bug#710078: hplip: LaserJet1018 doesn't work

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Smell like the program need x in ordre to run... I am worried by this bug. Could we set some defencive action like unsetting $DISPLAY in cups filter/cups ? > > Le 28 mai 2013 07:45, "Andrey Paramonov" a écrit : &

Bug#710078: hplip: LaserJet1018 doesn't work

Smell like the program need x in ordre to run... Le 28 mai 2013 07:45, "Andrey Paramonov" a écrit : > Package: hplip > Version: 3.13.4-1 > Severity: serious > > Dear Maintainer, > > My printer LaserJet1018 works no more with latest hplip package. > Printer can be detected and setup via hp-setup j

Bug#709584: cups-filters: outdated embedded data copy: aglfn

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > Source: cups-filters > Severity: normal > Usertags: embed > > The cups-filters source package contains an embedded data copy that is > also outdated (aglfn13.c). This file is shipped in the cups-filters > source package and compiled into libfonte

Re: #532097: cups RFA -> RFH

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > Le samedi, 9 mars 2013 14.17:27, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : >> I will step on it. Please coule web have a debian todo list and how to ? > > Great, thanks for the offer. All that we h

Bug#696417: pdfopt: crash on some input PDF file

control: tags -1 + wontfix according to upstream pdfopt is obsolete On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > control: forwarded -1 http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693522 > control: tags -1 + upstream > thanks > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10

Bug#696417: pdfopt: crash on some input PDF file

control: forwarded -1 http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693522 control: tags -1 + upstream thanks On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Could you report upstream ? > > Thanks > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrot

Bug#696464: hp 1020 debian 7 failed

It seems you printer need a firmware in order to print. try to run as root hp-plugin and if it work please report here On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov > wrote: >> - the section CUPS web interface &

Bug#696464: hp 1020 debian 7 failed

his information 2) on my previous message Thanks The error is here: D [21/Dec/2012:18:06:56 +0400] [Job 110] prnt/hpcups/HPCupsFilter.cpp 443: m_Job initialization failed with error = 48DEBUG: Read 16 bytes of print data... > -- AK > > > On 22 December 2012 16:35, Bastien ROUCARIES

Bug#696464: hp 1020 debian 7 failed

s-dynamic-counters 0 > status-type 8 > support-released True > support-subtype 16556 > support-type 2 > support-ver 2.7.10 > tech-class ['LJZjsMono'] > te

Bug#696464: hp 1020 debian 7 failed

Dear alexy, Could you please follow the step detailled ? And please join the file here instead of use pastebin. We do not know even if it is a usb or a netork devince (guess a netwrk device). And failled to print is unknown to me. It could be: - I wait five minute and it print nothing - paper wa

Bug#696464: hp 1020 debian 7 failed

Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Control: tag -1 + unreproducible Please debug using the manual debug instruction here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems Le 21 déc. 2012 08:39, "Alexey Kuznetsov" a écrit : > > Package: hplip > Version: 3.12.6-3 > > hp laser jet 1020 failed to print > > P

Bug#696417: pdfopt: crash on some input PDF file

Could you try to reproduce with unstable version? Le 20 déc. 2012 16:18, "Mathieu Malaterre" a écrit : > Package: ghostscript > Version: 8.71~dfsg2-9 > Severity: important > File: /usr/bin/pdfopt > > I was trying to compress a PDF file generated from my HP/Scanner. The file > is reported as: > >

Bug#682407: Ok for fixed in release

Didier you forget this one on the nmu. Care to redo? Le 24 nov. 2012 15:21, "Bastien ROUCARIES" a écrit : > I have talk about this bug for debian release team particularly Mehdi > Dogguy at debian paris mini conf. It is ok to fix > for wheezy. > > Bastien > >

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Hi Jonas, > > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much simpler >> > > solution. the "master" branch is not intended for Wheezy, I will >> > > us

Bug#687300: ghostscript: Please enable xz compression on all binaries

If you do a nmu they are a few rc bug with patch. Wil post you the list tomorrow. Bastien (apprentice maintenair of ghostscript) Le 17 sept. 2012 17:04, "Cyril Brulebois" a écrit : > Hi, > > Cyril Brulebois (11/09/2012): > > Package: ghostscript > > Version: 9.05~dfsg-6 > > Severity: important

Bug#605589: Download of plug-in fails -- also with Laserjet Pro CP1525n (probably patch available)

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Patrick Rudin wrote: > I just checked the source of hplip and imho there is just a simple typo: > > file: > ./hplip-3.12.6/prnt/ps/hp-laserjet_cp1520_series-ps.ppd.gz > > *Product: "(HP LaserJet CP1525N)" > > Should be n, not N. The real name is CP1525n, and that's

Bug#483086: Could we do something about this bug? was gs-common should be in oldlibs

Any idea ? Le 3 août 2012 10:33, "Bastien ROUCARIES" a écrit : > hi, > > Could we do something about this bug asking to gs-common to be in oldlibs ? > > Thank you. > > Bastien >

Bug#531624: Fixes upstream

Tags 531624 + upstream Tags 531624 + fixed-upstream Tags 531624 + confirmed Thanks Master d8ca80d fixed upstream by using libcms2 (9.06) Bastion

Bug#682426: Decrease severity

Yes : 1 does not affect thé whole package 2 lack of information about printer 3 moreinfo needed 4 does not seems to affect every user 5 does not break install Le 3 août 2012 18:23, "Didier Raboud" a écrit : > Le vendredi, 3 août 2012 18.10:53, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > &

Bug#682426: Decrease severity

Severity 682426 important Thank

Bug#483086: Could we do something about this bug? was gs-common should be in oldlibs

hi, Could we do something about this bug asking to gs-common to be in oldlibs ? Thank you. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAafmWmP

Bug#475873: Serious bug was config files left around after switch to ghostscript?

Hi, I think this bug #475873 is serious, and should be fixed before stable. What do you think ? It is a matter of dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile file in the ghostscript maintener script. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-07-30 at 10:03pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jonas Smedegaard >> wrote: >> > On 12-07-29 at 09:04pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> >> Le dimanche

Bug#649931: [ghostscript] wontfix

tags 649931 + wontfix thanks According to upstream; In all these cases I do not intend to make any changes. These do not cause any current problems and at least one validity checker is known to parse the XML looking for uuid: (number 3 above). Removing any of these is (in my opinion) more likely

Bug#649909: [ghostscript] Forwarded

notforwarded 649909 forwarded 649909 http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692422 thanks The first bug was reported upstream and closed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archi

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-07-29 at 09:04pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> > > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much >> > > > simpler solution. the "master" branch is

Bug#619934: [ghostscript] Patch

tags 619934 + patch thanks Fixed en man page. We may fix de man page. This change should be carried only on the debian side. Upstream could have other need about advertising. Bastien diff --git a/man/gs.1 b/man/gs.1 index b00a9b6..bd00870 100644 --- a/man/gs.1 +++ b/man/gs.1 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@

Bug#588929: CUPS unable to print. CUPS runs gs and libgs8 shows segmentation fault in the /var/log/messages

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > tags 588929 + moreinfo > tags 588929 + unreproducible > thanks > > Dear debian user, > > Could you retry with newer version and report. > > Feel free to close this bug report is needed. > > Thanks > &

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

tags 520753 + patch reasign 520753 ghostscript-cups severity important thanks Hi, Bug 520753 is about a faillure in postinst script when /etc/cups/ppd is not present. i am tented to raise this bug as serious, because ti could break install. What is your opinion ? Bastien fix-cups-dir-in-post

Bug#631403: Ghostscript bug care to send the ps file ?

tags 631403 + unreproducible tags 631403 + morinfo thanks Dear andres, Could you send us the postscript file ? Thanks you very much Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archi

Bug#588929: CUPS unable to print. CUPS runs gs and libgs8 shows segmentation fault in the /var/log/messages

tags 588929 + moreinfo tags 588929 + unreproducible thanks Dear debian user, Could you retry with newer version and report. Feel free to close this bug report is needed. Thanks Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: [RFC] Even on freez does this bug need to go to ghostscript ?

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-07-24 at 06:36pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> I have made a past for ghostscript that will ease the debugging of >> ghostscript problem. >> >> Instead of printing numeric error ghostscript will print >

[RFC] Even on freez does this bug need to go to ghostscript ?

Hi, I have made a past for ghostscript that will ease the debugging of ghostscript problem. Instead of printing numeric error ghostscript will print strerror(error). It is a one liner quite safe because code path is tested on dos and windows (please do not laugth). Now: * do you think this patc

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-07-24 at 03:49pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> > Please subscribe to our mailinglist and tell me, so we can drop the cc. > > Did you see the above?

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-07-24 at 01:52pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> Ok I am member of collab maint. > > Good. > > Please subscribe to our mailinglist and tell me, so we can drop the cc. > > >> BTW I see taht

Re: Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > I now moved this discussion to our team mailinglist. I have cc'ed you > for now - please tell if (or when) you are subscribed there. > > On 12-07-24 at 11:35am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> De

Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > tags pending > thanks > > On 12-07-23 at 05:13pm, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> >> > Ok see patch >> >> Thank you. Looks good to me. > > Looks good to me too.

Bug#618361: Patch for documentation bug on ghostscript

tags 618361 + patch thanks See patch. Modify if needed. Bastien 0001-Remove-other-os-stuff.patch Description: Binary data 0002-Fix-path-for-debian.patch Description: Binary data 0003-Add-install-ghostscript-doc.patch Description: Binary data 0004-Add-hint-for-debian-package.patch Descript

Bug#582522: please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more clearly

tags 582522 + patch thanks On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > retitle 582522 please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream > more clearly > # documentation > severity 582522 minor > found 582522 ghostscript/9.05~dfsg-6 > quit > >

Bug#586970: Unreproducible please supply file.ps

Dear Kingsley G. Morse Jr., Could you give us if possible more information about bug report 586970 http://bugs.debian.org On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > tags 586970 + moreinfo > tags 586970 + unreproducible > thanks > > Without the file.ps thi

Bug#404017: Wontfix

tags 404017 + wontfix thanks Upstream mark it as wontfix -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAa3OgrzWKb9dVKXvdjvY0iU6qbQmr=B0w=odsoxzgt...@mail.

Bug#582522: Now that README.Debian has some comment close ?

tags 582522 + wontfix thanks Now that README.Debian has some comment about the case, time to close ? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2S

Bug#367437: your mail

forwarded 367437 http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693214 thanks On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > tags 367437 - unreproducible > tags 367437 + upstream > found 367437 9.05~dfsg-6 > thanks > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Ryan C. Underwoo

Bug#367437: your mail

tags 367437 - unreproducible tags 367437 + upstream found 367437 9.05~dfsg-6 thanks On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Ryan C. Underwood wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:24:42PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> >> Yes but I could not access to the file in order to submit upst

Bug#649909: Xmp data

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-07-23 at 06:00pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> Could you give precision of how to dump xmp data from pdf ? >> >> And retest your two bug report with newer upstream ? > > It was already described in origi

Bug#611993: Fixed upstream

tags 611993 + fixed-upstream thanks authorChris Liddell Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:27:30 + (14:27 +0100) committerChris Liddell Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:50:29 + (14:50 +0100) commitf661e5225bb017d15b50c2aecda7d4283f8f3aa9 tree777a5a56c446ad7c6e48bf863c11706ef9cc0f93tree | snapshot parent7dfac701b8

Bug#422712: [ghostscript] Forwarded

forwarded 422712 http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693213 thanks Forwarded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207231831.17791.roucaries.b

Bug#367437: your mail

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Ryan C. Underwood wrote: > > Bastien, > > In your message dated Mon, 7 Feb 2011 to this bug, it indicates that > you did in fact reproduce the bug. Yes but I could not access to the file in order to submit upstream Thanks Bastien > -- > Ryan C. Underwood,

Bug#555005: [ghostscript]

severity 555005 whislist thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207231806.22386.roucaries.bast...@gmail.com

Bug#649909: Xmp data

Hi, Could you give precision of how to dump xmp data from pdf ? And retest your two bug report with newer upstream ? Thanks bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: htt

Bug#622196: Could you try to reproduce with newer gs ?

tags 622196 + moreinfo thanks Hi, I ma unable to reproduce your bug about irw.ps with newer ps. Care to retest and close this bug ? Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Arch

Bug#642247: Could not reproduce your bug

tags 642247 + moreinfo thanks Can youget gs to segfault from the command line? Maybe adding "LogLevel debug" to /etc/cups/cupsd.conf and looking at /var/log/cups/error_log would help with this. And test with a newer version Thanks for helping debian Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia

Bug#619476: Could you try to reproduce your bug

tags 619476 moreinfo thanks Hi, Thanks for reporting this bug. However we could not reproduce because you do not gve enouth detail. Care to retry to print this file wirh "LogLevel debug" to /etc/cups/cupsd.conf and looking at /var/log/cups/error_log would help with this. Thanks -- To UNSUB

Bug#592540: Unreproducible

tags 592540 + unreproducible tags 592540 + moreinfo thanks Dear debian user, We can not reproduce your bug. Could you at least join the file where pdftoraster choke ? thanks bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#682407: Patch

tags 682407 +fixed-upstream thanks Bug 693208: improve error feedback (when we can) authorChris Liddell Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:15:01 + (14:15 +0100) committerChris Liddell Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:50:29 + (14:50 +0100) commit7dfac701b8a36395a88a69b3a1e9eeaaa70c6b0b treece474fe7ca9475bed245c

Bug#586970: Unreproducible please supply file.ps

tags 586970 + moreinfo tags 586970 + unreproducible thanks Without the file.ps this bug report is unreproducible and could not be forwarded upstream. Please join file.ps Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Bug#582846: [ghostscript] Could you try to reproduce your bug ?

tags 582846 +moreinfo thanks Dear VDR dai, Could you try to reproduce this bug with the newer ghostscript. I could not reproduce with 9.05~dfsg-6 thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb

Bug#568178: [ghostscript bug] Please join file

tags 568178 + unreproducible tags 568178 + moreinfo thanks Hi david, Could you send here the two ps file with the problem you mentionned in this bug report ? Thanks bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#555005: [ghostscript] Patch

tags 555005 + patch thanks Indeed this patch could be carried by debian package -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207231651.05427.roucaries.bast..

Bug#548334: [ghostscript] Unreproducibe

notfound 548334 9.05~dfsg-6 tags 548334 + unreproducible tags 548334 + moreinfo thanks Dear debian user, Could you confirm that newer ghostscript does not segfault? If so could you close ? Bastien PS: unreproducible in the sense of unreproducible with next stable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#661863: pending

tags 661863 + pending thanks fixed in git means pending -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAbOB1AARo0eD+Y7XY=1kpJ77YH=1pmhwebg0vd0w5c...@mail.g

Bug#440478: [ghostscript]

tags 440478 + fixed-upstream thanks Fixed by commit a88326f1ca382092c889ffa9be1abe857c118a34 Bug 693166: Optimise interpolation When interpolating, ghostscript pays no heed to the clipping rectangle. Hence if we scale (say) a 256x256 image up to (say)17067x17067, even though only a small portion

Bug#440478: [ghostscript]

found 440478 9.05~dfsg-5 forwarded 440478 http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693209 thanks fwd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2012072311

  1   2   3   >