PARC64.
>
> I should followup with gcc 8-beta results shortly.
>
> Dennis
>
> ps: is anyone else having fun with this or just me ?
Well, I don't have time to spend on this but I'm tracking you fairly
closely.
Of course our spam filter decided to classify you as a sp
El Sábado 24 Febrero 2007 20:08, Børge Holen escribió:
> What would be the easiest way to get the midi files goin?
> timidity and freepats outputs sound but is quite the download and bad
> looking interface. (no phun intended and no dissing of bitchx users).
Try fluidsynth and a good soundfont (e.
Le mar 2006-08-01 a 01:09:55 -0400, brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> another important consideration as far as i know,
> it could be worse than spam. mail has always been
> the way 'nix systems get broken into. especially if
eh? like the other dude said,
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 03:34:50PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> Probably, I'll have to either ask Joey himself, or look at the
> presentation video. But that is more than it was before.
but I would still not call it "security support". Anyway, wrong list
for such discussions, so stopping
On 02/08/06, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Eddy Petri??or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060801 17:48]:
> This is no longer true for soe time now. Testing now _has_ security
> updates. The testing security team is lead by Joey Hess.
Wasn't their policy to only issue their own security ad
* Eddy Petri??or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060801 17:48]:
> This is no longer true for soe time now. Testing now _has_ security
> updates. The testing security team is lead by Joey Hess.
Wasn't their policy to only issue their own security advisories, if the
package fixing the problem in unstable woul
On 01/08/06, Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:48:45PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> On 01/08/06, brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is no longer true for soe time now. Testing now _has_ security
> updates. The testing security team is lead by Joe
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:07:22PM -0700, brian wrote:
> another important consideration as far as i know,
> it could be worse than spam. mail has always been
> the way 'nix systems get broken into. especially if
You mean windows? Which Unix/Linux mail client i
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:48:45PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> On 01/08/06, brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is no longer true for soe time now. Testing now _has_ security
> updates. The testing security team is lead by Joey Hess.
When did you receive the last security update for
On 01/08/06, brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
another important consideration as far as i know,
it could be worse than spam. mail has always been
the way 'nix systems get broken into. especially if
you are running testing/unstable where you don't
get security updates.
T
l learn to screen spam into a bulk folder, will also put mailing list real mail into folders automatically. i guess some people know how to download mail off some of these servers, which of course they resist as they want you to read their ads. ditto with ad-filters, in my experience...
Is there anything to do about all the spam that gets posted to this
list, or do we just delete it? Spammers also seem to have mined my
email address out of the postings and now I get spam directly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
The past 24 hours or so I've received two messages with
debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org as the forged return address, probably
in response to posts I made on the list. Both messages contain
suspicious attachments, though I presume gmail did not recognize them
as known worms. One originated from 59.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 03:47:49PM +0200, Federico 'Pain' Pistono wrote:
} Dont' you get a bit too much spam in from this ML?
}
} Not that it bothers me that much, gMail thinks about it, but I do get
} a significant amount of unwanted email directed to the DebianPPC ML.
}
} What d
On Sep 15, 2005, at 10:32 AM, Tommy Trussell wrote:
On 9/15/05, Federico 'Pain' Pistono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dont' you get a bit too much spam in from this ML?
Not that it bothers me that much, gMail thinks about it, but I do get
a significant amount of unwanted
On 9/15/05, Federico 'Pain' Pistono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dont' you get a bit too much spam in from this ML?
>
> Not that it bothers me that much, gMail thinks about it, but I do get
> a significant amount of unwanted email directed to the DebianPPC ML
Dont' you get a bit too much spam in from this ML?
Not that it bothers me that much, gMail thinks about it, but I do get
a significant amount of unwanted email directed to the DebianPPC ML.
What do you think?
--
Federico Pistono
Department of Computer Science - Verona, Italy
My we
Bonjour,
Merci pour votre message.
Toutes vos demandes seront traitées dès le 24 août prochain.
Nous vous remercions pour votre compréhension.
Cordialement,
L'équipe Larousse.fr
Hello from Argentina!! My name is Manuel.
Introduction:
I recently bought an iBook G4 1Ghz, Ati Mobility Radeon 9200 32Mb,
256Mb RAM, 40Gb Hard Disk, etc, etc.
I am a Slackware user in PC's, I was recommended for use Debian on
my new iBook, I download Debian Woody 3.0_r2 iso's, then start the
in
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:32:44PM +0100, Bart Koppe wrote:
> Since i joined the debian-powerpc-lis i get at least 10-15 spam
> messages a day :(
10-15 mails a day is at the low end.
> All microsoft-sjit or e-mails with only one attachement.
> Pretty annoying because i menaged
"Re: debianppc
list and sven virus" in the archives for more details.
Good luck!--Harvey
Bart Koppe wrote:
Since i joined the debian-powerpc-lis i get at least 10-15 spam
messages a day :(
All microsoft-sjit or e-mails with only one attachement.
Pretty annoying because i menaged
Since i joined the debian-powerpc-lis i get at least 10-15 spam
messages a day :(
All microsoft-sjit or e-mails with only one attachement.
Pretty annoying because i menaged to be almost spam-free for 6 years by
now..
grr..
Anybody have this problems to?
Can we do something against it (besides
Quoting Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Can anyone recommend a good spam filter for Debian???
> > I use Mozilla as my mail client on an Apple PowerBook and also an
> Intel
> > desktop.
>
> Mozilla includes a bayesian spam filter, doesn't it?
Not the vers
On October 27, 2003 09:15, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> I don't know how you could integrate SA into mozilla without setting
> up a "proper" Unix mailsystem with procmail et al, though.
You can use Mozilla's hidden movemail support to do it.
http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/mozilla-spamassassin-HOWDID.html
--
On Monday 27 October 2003 15:15, Rob Weir wrote:
> This is a good question, and I've never seen a comparison of this. SA +
> some simple procmail rules catches basically all my spam.
Well, SA has a rules system plus a bayesian filter so apart from start working
from the very first d
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:41:57PM +1100, Brendan J Simon said
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone recommend a good spam filter for Debian???
> I use Mozilla as my mail client on an Apple PowerBook and also an Intel
> desktop.
Mozilla includes a bayesian spam filter, doesn't it?
> A
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a good spam filter for Debian???
I use Mozilla as my mail client on an Apple PowerBook and also an Intel
desktop.
Are there differences in power and ease of use between all the various
spam filters?
Which are the most actively used and maintained?
Which are the most
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Zach Archer wrote:
>
> > At 8:12 PM -0700 10/1/03, Robert Persson wrote:
> > >I have also just subscribed and I am wondering about these emails.
> > >I am subscribed to a number of lists so I don't know which one these
> > >come fr
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Zach Archer wrote:
> At 8:12 PM -0700 10/1/03, Robert Persson wrote:
> >I have also just subscribed and I am wondering about these emails.
> >I am subscribed to a number of lists so I don't know which one these
> >come from. Are the Debian lists particularly prone to this sort
Hello.
I've been hammered with those emails since 2 weeks. The reason was most
probably lkml (linux kernel mailing list). Some people have not noticed that
their windos machines are sending out stuff all the time. The only way to get
rid of those junk is to configure fetchmail that it won't fet
On (01/10/03 21:23), Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:12:26PM -0700, Zach Archer wrote:
> > Hi. I started receiving a whole lot of spam last night, shortly after
> > subscribing and posting to this newsgroup for the first time. I'm not
> > sure which b
On Thursday 02 October 2003 04:12, Zach Archer wrote:
> Hi. I started receiving a whole lot of spam last night, shortly after
> subscribing and posting to this newsgroup for the first time. I'm not
(This is not a newsgroup, but a mailing list)
> sure which brand of net-annoyant
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Gary Sandine wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 22:23, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > I also gave my ISP an earfull for
> > not affering any server side solutions.
>
> I don't think this particular rash of e-mails would have happened if the
> list archives altered e-mail addresses. Too
ople in weeks, so... >it's coming from someone on this list<
> >
>
> more likely that the virus - for that is what it is - has harvested the
> debian-powerpc list addresses from somewhere and is planging on them
> continuously. it's not hard to rip addresses out
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 22:23, Chris Tillman wrote:
> I also gave my ISP an earfull for
> not affering any server side solutions.
I don't think this particular rash of e-mails would have happened if the
list archives altered e-mail addresses. Too late now, though.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:12:26PM -0700, Zach Archer wrote:
> Hi. I started receiving a whole lot of spam last night, shortly after
> subscribing and posting to this newsgroup for the first time. I'm not
> sure which brand of net-annoyant it is, but I'm receiving a lot of
likely that the virus - for that is what it is - has harvested the
debian-powerpc list addresses from somewhere and is planging on them
continuously. it's not hard to rip addresses out of the innumerable list
archives out there. use a spam-filtering mail proggy (mozilla mail, for
example), or
At 8:12 PM -0700 10/1/03, Robert Persson wrote:
I have also just subscribed and I am wondering about these emails.
I am subscribed to a number of lists so I don't know which one these
come from. Are the Debian lists particularly prone to this sort of
stuff, or have we just been unlucky?
I co
Zach Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi. I started receiving a whole lot of spam last night, shortly after
subscribing and posting to this newsgroup for the first time. I'm not
sure which brand of net-annoyant it is, but I'm receiving a lot of
messages with big .exe files attache
Hi. I started receiving a whole lot of spam last night, shortly after
subscribing and posting to this newsgroup for the first time. I'm not
sure which brand of net-annoyant it is, but I'm receiving a lot of
messages with big .exe files attached (funny that I can't open these
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--9F.3_AB7D6
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=
--=_NextPart_000_00B3_87B84A8D.E1145B26
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
WU91cnMNCjxodG1sPjxoZWFkPg0KPHRpdGxlPkxiZ3d1bWhwZWdkdG5vYmR4
Z2lyd3hnbm5mamxra3hsaW90YmZzZXF3dzwvdGl0bGU+PC9oZWFkPjxib2R5
PjxjZW50ZXI+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy5sb3d
Title: Spam in the works?
Is this a spam?
-- Ashesh
-- Forwarded Message
From: Mervyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:47:52 -0600
To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: We Can Fix Your Credit. ispwk
Resent-From: debian-powerpc@lists.debi
scripsit MR. ANGUS OBIOMA:
> Dear Gentleman,
> Greetings in the precious name of Jesus Christ.
[etc.]
This one has a real IP address:
> Received: from (emztd536.com) [213.181.64.14]
>by gluck.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
>id 17f2DJ-0001RM-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:45:47 -0
CIBLEZ
ET DEMARCHEZ GRATUITEMENT VOS PROSPECTS
PAR
CENTAINE DE MILLIERS GRACE AU ROBOT
MAIL
-
5000 fois
http://nancho.starhana.com";>http://myhome.hananet.net/~nannaya77/js/don1.js";>
http://nancho.starhana.com"; target=_blank>http://starhana.com/images/mtima1.jpg"; border=0 width="134"
height="114">http://starhana.com/images/mtima2.gif"; border=0
width="146"
http://nancho.starhana.com";>http://myhome.hananet.net/~nannaya77/js/don1.js";>
http://nancho.starhana.com"; target=_blank>http://starhana.com/images/mtima1.jpg"; border=0 width="134"
height="114">http://starhana.com/images/mtima2.gif"; border=0
width="146"
p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;
}
¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä. º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏ
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
»çÀü Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»°Ô µÇ¾î¼
Áø½ÉÀ¸·Î
Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù
¸ÞÀÏ ¹Þ±â¸¦
¿øÄ¡
¾ÊÀ¸½Å´Ù¸é ¾Æ·¡ ¸ÞÀÏ·Î ¹Ý¼Û¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»Áֽøé ÀÌÈÄ¿¡´Â Àý´ë·Î ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ
¼ö½ÅµÇÁö ¾ÊÀ»
°ÍÀÔ´
p, font, span { line-height:120%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;
}
¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä. º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏ
ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
»çÀü Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»°Ô µÇ¾î¼
Áø½ÉÀ¸·Î
Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù
¸ÞÀÏ ¹Þ±â¸¦
¿øÄ¡
¾ÊÀ¸½Å´Ù¸é ¾Æ·¡ ¸ÞÀÏ·Î ¹Ý¼Û¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»Áֽøé ÀÌÈÄ¿¡´Â Àý´ë·Î ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ
¼ö½ÅµÇÁö ¾ÊÀ»
°ÍÀÔ´
49 matches
Mail list logo
