At Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:45:03 +0100, Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot wrote:
>
> I think is something related to bug #345885, at least what is described
> there is _exactly_ what happens to me, only that the solution suggested
> at the end: (Option "AccelMethod" "EXA") does not work for me :(
This morni
Hi,
Thanks for the information. I will try that.
Shreyas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El mar, 10-01-2006 a las 23:58 -0500, Shreyas Ananthan escribió:
> "Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > Just upgraded my pbook with a nvidia card to xorg-6.9.0 and everything
> > seems to work ok except nautilus (my version i
"Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just upgraded my pbook with a nvidia card to xorg-6.9.0 and everything
> seems to work ok except nautilus (my version is 2.12.2-1), the desktop
> is drawn corrupted, every other application works ok.
I experience
At Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:20:37 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> Ruben wrote:
> > ps: I assume you are using Gnome 1.12? How did you install this.. by
> > temporarily giving high priority (in /etc/apt/preferences) to the
> > experimental archive for installing Gnome? That's the only way I can
>
Ruben wrote:
> ps: I assume you are using Gnome 1.12? How did you install this.. by
> temporarily giving high priority (in /etc/apt/preferences) to the
> experimental archive for installing Gnome? That's the only way I can
> think of, but it seems far from ideal. Or is there a way to force
> pul
ft
> 'trails', desktop icons were drawn twice on slighlty different
> positions.
> After booting up my laptop this morning, everything seemed fine, no
> trails anymore, but now something is wrong with nautilus: the
> background in a nautilus window shows part of itself, with
At Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:00:56 +0100, Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot wrote:
>
> Hi list:
>
> Just upgraded my pbook with a nvidia card to xorg-6.9.0 and everything
> seems to work ok except nautilus (my version is 2.12.2-1), the desktop
> is drawn corrupted, every other application w
Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 11:00 +0100, Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot a
écrit :
> Hi list:
>
> Just upgraded my pbook with a nvidia card to xorg-6.9.0 and everything
> seems to work ok except nautilus (my version is 2.12.2-1), the desktop
> is drawn corrupted, every other appli
Hi list:
Just upgraded my pbook with a nvidia card to xorg-6.9.0 and everything
seems to work ok except nautilus (my version is 2.12.2-1), the desktop
is drawn corrupted, every other application works ok.
I've isolated the problem and if I downgrade _only_ xserver-xorg to
6.8.2 nautilus wor
Le vendredi 21 novembre 2003 à 08:32
Jacob Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
(I'm CC-ing this to debian-powerpc as it may help some of us)
[...]
That's it, I've figured out what was wrong with the keymap that made the
BackSpace key unusable with Nautilus.
Hi all,
I´m running unstable on the TiBook IV 1Ghz, with Gnome 2.4 (as it is
from unstable).
In Nautilus from Gnome 2.2 there was the scripts folder and I could
run my nautilus scripts without problems.
But since Gnome 2.4 packages came out the scripts entry at the file menu
is missing. In
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Lucas Moulin wrote:
> On lun, nov 17 22:45
> Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>
> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Lucas Moulin wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to use Nautilus to view my files on my other computer via ssh.
> >&g
On lun, nov 17 22:45
Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Lucas Moulin wrote:
>
>> I'd like to use Nautilus to view my files on my other computer via ssh. I've
>> installed Nautilus, ssh-askpass-gnome and gnome-vfs-sftp. But t
g report? Thanks for your help.
>
> check your keymap first.
If my keymap was to blame, shouldn't I have problems on other
applications as well ? Strange thing is only Nautilus bugs me :(
--
Lucas Moulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"La bêtise, c'est de la paresse." - Jacques Brel
pgpYAD2vOWBGo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Lucas Moulin wrote:
> I'd like to use Nautilus to view my files on my other computer via ssh. I've
> installed Nautilus, ssh-askpass-gnome and gnome-vfs-sftp. But the thing is,
> Nautilus asks me a password, and then freezes.
>
> The reason I&
Hey all once again,
I've discovered another bug in Nautilus. Well, I don't know if this is
one yet, so I'd like to ask you if you've seen this before.
I'd like to use Nautilus to view my files on my other computer via
ssh. I've installed Nautilus, ssh-askpass-gno
Hey all,
I don't know if this is really ppc-related, but I think it has to do
with my iBook keymap, so here it is.
I'm using Nautilus (latest version in Sid) and I tried to rename some
files, either via F2 key or right click > rename. If I hit Backspace to
erase the name of the fil
On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 04:17, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> > nautilus: Depends: gconf (>= 1.0.7) but 1.0.4-3 is to be installed
> > [...]
>
> If you just want to upgrade these packages without moving your entire
> system to sid, run "apt-get install gconf/unstable l
> nautilus: Depends: gconf (>= 1.0.7) but 1.0.4-3 is to be installed
> [...]
If you just want to upgrade these packages without moving your entire
system to sid, run "apt-get install gconf/unstable libeel0/unstable ...".
Laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not so fast... It worked when I was doing an apt-get
> update/dist-upgrade on a woody machine with apt/sources.list
> pointing to unstable deb packages.
Then you would be just upgrading to unstable.
> Now, if I do the nautilus install on a
Not so fast... It worked when I was doing an apt-get update/dist-upgrade
on a woody machine with apt/sources.list pointing to unstable deb packages.
Now, if I do the nautilus install on another system with testing
installed and APT::Default-Release "testing"; in my debconf, then
Nautilus installed fine and works great now. What a beauty!
Thanks,
LdS
- Original Message -
From: "Michel Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Laurent de Segur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: Nautilus unst
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 21:48, Laurent de Segur wrote:
> I just tried the installation of Nautilus from sid running woody. There is a
> dependency of libeel0 on libeel-data and vice-and-versa that causes the
> package installer to barf an error message suggesting that I file a bug. I
>
Hi,
I just tried the installation of Nautilus from sid running woody. There is a
dependency of libeel0 on libeel-data and vice-and-versa that causes the
package installer to barf an error message suggesting that I file a bug. I
tried force-installing the 2 individual libs but this shows the same
Am 10.8.2001 1:30 Uhr schrieb "Wilhelm Fitzpatrick" unter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I installed the Nautilus that is packaged in unstable (and I must say I am
> impressed). However, when I click on web pages, it shows them as text
> inside the Nautilus frame. I have the
I installed the Nautilus that is packaged in unstable (and I must say I am
impressed). However, when I click on web pages, it shows them as text
inside the Nautilus frame. I have the package 0.9.1 version of Mozilla
from penguinppc.org, and it was my understanding that Nautilus was
supposed to
Craige McWhirter wrote:
> I'm upgrading a few other libs at the mo', so I'll see what difference they
> make :)
Do you use apt/dselect? Did it not get all of the new stuff automatically,
from xml to
bonobo to libglade?
-Adam P.
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:09:02PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Thanks a lot!!! (my [EMAIL PROTECTED] is umm somewhat too slow to compile
> > such
> > beast in resonable time =o((( )
>
> Actually, that's what I compiled on! :-)
Geee! You are really brave!! =o)))
(on second thought.. um
Upgrading Bonobo did the trick nicely - everything works well except importing
my old mail and gnome-card. Looks like I may finally be pushed to put more RAM
in
the old beige work horse (either that or teach my wife to use Mutt!).
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:25:24 Craige McWhirter wrote:
> No unfortun
No unfortunately. What it turned out to be was that I needed a more recent
version of libxml1 (in my ignorance, I thought this would be a dependency as it
was a
show stopper? Feel free to slap me down if I am wrong). I've upgraded my
libxml2 and now Evolution starts fine, I have other problems (no
On 20 Feb 2001 13:41:26 +1100, Craige McWhirter wrote:
> A bit of scrounging though Google and this appears to be due to one of my
> GNOME/xml packages not being up to scratch. I've not had any luck yet working
> out
> which one. Any ideas people?
I downloaded evolution over the weekend for my P
> Robert Ramiega wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:47:09AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > > > If nautilus works, does this mean evolution will compile?
> > > >
> > > > No, because there's no Debian evolution package. :-(
&
ote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:47:09AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > > If nautilus works, does this mean evolution will compile?
> > >
> > > No, because there's no Debian evolution package. :-(
> > Well to be completely honest ther
Robert Ramiega wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:13:37AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Actually, now there is an official Debian package too. I compiled yesterday
> > morning and uploaded around 1 PM (U.S. Eastern time), and was in the
> > archive by
> > 4 AM (when my mirror updates).
>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:13:37AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Actually, now there is an official Debian package too. I compiled yesterday
> morning and uploaded around 1 PM (U.S. Eastern time), and was in the archive
> by
> 4 AM (when my mirror updates).
Thanks a lot!!! (my [EMAIL PROTECTE
Robert Ramiega wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:47:09AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > If nautilus works, does this mean evolution will compile?
> >
> > No, because there's no Debian evolution package. :-(
> Well to be completely honest there is
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:47:09AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > If nautilus works, does this mean evolution will compile?
>
> No, because there's no Debian evolution package. :-(
Well to be completely honest there is no oficial debian package... On
helixcode.com (or wha
Phil Fraering wrote:
> I sort of had as a back burner project getting everything together
> I'd need to compile nautilus.
Nautilus actually has a real Build-Depends, but some of its dependencies don't
(e.g. medusa), and libglade doesn't build out-of-box right now.
I bui
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:06:33AM -0600, Phil Fraering wrote:
>
> PS: How do you determine which packages are necessary to compile
> a debian source package against? Is there a command for apt-cache
> or something like that?
if its done right it should include build-depends which you can see in
I sort of had as a back burner project getting everything together
I'd need to compile nautilus.
However, yesterday I checked to see if nautilus was available precompiled
and it was. I'm downloading it now to see if it works.
If nautilus works, does this mean evolution will compile?
ne
> has compiled nautilus on debian-powerpc yet.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Hi. I thought I'd toss a feeler out, see if anyone
has compiled nautilus on debian-powerpc yet.
Thanks a lot!
Phil
43 matches
Mail list logo
