Hi,
Rory Campbell-Lange writes:
> On 17/04/04, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > That said the 2.6.5 kernel we are preparing [...]
> I'd like to compile a 2.6.5 kernel suitable for the 800Mhz G3 iBook
> that started this thread(!). I'd be grateful to know where I should
> get reasonabl
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:52:43 +0100,
Rory Campbell-Lange gracefully wrote:
>After discussing uninorth/agp problems on the 2.4 series kernels, Sven
>reported:
>
>On 17/04/04, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> That said the 2.6.5 kernel we are preparing has a nicely working DRI
>on> my ibook
After discussing uninorth/agp problems on the 2.4 series kernels, Sven
reported:
On 17/04/04, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> That said the 2.6.5 kernel we are preparing has a nicely working DRI on
> my ibook G3, so probably the sane solution would be to go with a 2.6
> kernel by default
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 07:19:07PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 20:04, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:19:11PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 19:12, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 20:04, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:19:11PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 19:12, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > That was before i loaded the agpgart module first
On 15/04/04, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:19:11PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 19:12, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Note that the fact that you get a lockup pro
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 07:19:11PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 19:12, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > >
> > > Note that the fact that you get a lockup probably means that AGP does
> > > get enabled, and it might be a
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 19:12, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > Note that the fact that you get a lockup probably means that AGP does
> > get enabled, and it might be a different problem.
>
> That was before i loaded the agpgart module firs
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 08:02, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:57:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:31, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
> > > > BTW, where is : VMAP_4_ARGS supposed to be
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 08:02, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:57:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:31, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > BTW, where is : VMAP_4_ARGS supposed to be defined ?
> >
> > In the DRI CVS Makefile. You can just drop the guards,
reopen 242553
thanks
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:57:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:31, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > BTW, where is : VMAP_4_ARGS supposed to be defined ?
>
> In the DRI CVS Makefile. You can just drop the guards, the idea is that
> this code should only
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:57:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:31, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > BTW, where is : VMAP_4_ARGS supposed to be defined ?
>
> In the DRI CVS Makefile. You can just drop the guards, the idea is that
> this code should only be used in drm-trunk-m
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:57:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:31, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > BTW, where is : VMAP_4_ARGS supposed to be defined ?
>
> In the DRI CVS Makefile. You can just drop the guards, the idea is that
> this code should only be used in drm-trunk-m
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:31, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> BTW, where is : VMAP_4_ARGS supposed to be defined ?
In the DRI CVS Makefile. You can just drop the guards, the idea is that
this code should only be used in drm-trunk-module-src if the current,
better solution doesn't work.
--
Earthling Mic
> > I read him) cautioned against using more recent stuff until he got the
> > new 2.6 framebuffer changed sorted out. From what I see in 2.6.5, that
> > hasn't been completed yet (unless 2.6.5-rc3-ben0 is more broken than
> > the mainstream kernel).
>
> Ok. Still, as far as debian is concerned, a
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:16:51PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 03:21:09PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 15:00, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Once i test it (i now have a ibook G3 800, so i
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:16:51PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 03:21:09PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 15:00, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Once i test it (i now have a ibook G3 800, so i
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 03:21:09PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 15:00, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > Once i test it (i now have a ibook G3 800, so i can do the test myself),
> > > what is the symptom that show that the fi
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 03:21:09PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 15:00, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > Once i test it (i now have a ibook G3 800, so i can do the test myself),
> > what is the symptom that show that the fix worked ?
>
> The DRM AGP initialisation should work.
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 15:00, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Once i test it (i now have a ibook G3 800, so i can do the test myself),
> what is the symptom that show that the fix worked ?
The DRM AGP initialisation should work.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI develop
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 14:45, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 02:38:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 14:27, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
> > > > or alternatively, if such a patch exists buildin
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 14:45, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 02:38:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 14:27, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > or alternatively, if such a patch exists building against the
> > > version of drm in the 2.4.25 kernel ?
> >
> > It sh
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 02:38:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 14:27, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:17:43PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, I now remember what the issue is... a patch like
> > > http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/drm-io
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 14:27, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:17:43PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I now remember what the issue is... a patch like
> > http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/drm-ioremapagp.diff is still needed
> > for the current 2.4 DRM to work with Un
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:17:43PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 11:30, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 10:30, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:26:01PM +0200, Kiko Piris wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oooops! I just remembered that agpgart and/or rad
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:38:02PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> > Michael, where have you been ? The default to use is not 2.6.3-benh, but
> > the new upstream 2.6.4, which include all the -benh stuff.
>
> Sven, don't lecture me on what I'm supposed to use for a kernel. Unlike
Sorry, the sm
> Michael, where have you been ? The default to use is not 2.6.3-benh, but
> the new upstream 2.6.4, which include all the -benh stuff.
Sven, don't lecture me on what I'm supposed to use for a kernel. Unlike
you, I do have access to PowerMacs and I do happen to prefer stuff that
works. When I wor
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:16:43PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Bug reports make the maintainers' life easier (unless you happen to keep a
> > > close tab on list gossip), I grant you that. But users are reluctant to
> > > file bug reports - first of all, what package to file against, how do
> > Bug reports make the maintainers' life easier (unless you happen to keep a
> > close tab on list gossip), I grant you that. But users are reluctant to
> > file bug reports - first of all, what package to file against, how do I
> > figure out the version, better ask on the list first. Oops, now
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 13:24, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Kiko Piris wrote:
> >
> > 1.- That one needed Michel Dänzer dri-trunk modules to get dri in 2.4
> > branch is *rally old* news (very old, indeed). Not ppc exclusive
> > btw.
It's so old that it hasn't
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:03:34PM +0200, Kiko Piris wrote:
> On 07/04/2004 at 12:42, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > reportbug kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac, and i will sort out stuff.
> >
> > Not reporting bugs and expecting things to get fixed is illusionary,
>
> Sincerely, I'm a bit surprise
On 07/04/2004 at 12:42, Sven Luther wrote:
> reportbug kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac, and i will sort out stuff.
>
> Not reporting bugs and expecting things to get fixed is illusionary,
Sincerely, I'm a bit surprised of your complaints about bug reports (and
of this mini-flame too).
1.-
> > You seem to be following this list :-) So doesn BenH, BTW.
>
> That is no excuse for a proper bug report. Such kind of things are much
> easier to miss or later forget if they are not properly filled.
> especially now that i am using the 2.4 benh tree, there should really be
> no reason not to
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:34:33PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > You seem to be following this list :-) So doesn BenH, BTW.
> >
> > That is no excuse for a proper bug report. Such kind of things are much
> > easier to miss or later forget if they are not properly filled.
> > especially now th
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:17:43PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 11:30, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 10:30, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:26:01PM +0200, Kiko Piris wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oooops! I just remembered that agpgart and/or rad
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:30:43AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 10:30, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:26:01PM +0200, Kiko Piris wrote:
> > >
> > > Oooops! I just remembered that agpgart and/or radeon that come with 2.4
> > > kernel is not recent enough for
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 11:30, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 10:30, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:26:01PM +0200, Kiko Piris wrote:
> > >
> > > Oooops! I just remembered that agpgart and/or radeon that come with 2.4
> > > kernel is not recent enough for dri.
> >
>
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 10:30, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:26:01PM +0200, Kiko Piris wrote:
> >
> > Oooops! I just remembered that agpgart and/or radeon that come with 2.4
> > kernel is not recent enough for dri.
>
> Arg, how am i going to fix this kind of things if nobody fills
> > Oooops! I just remembered that agpgart and/or radeon that come with 2.4
> > kernel is not recent enough for dri.
>
> Arg, how am i going to fix this kind of things if nobody fills a bug
> report about it ?
You seem to be following this list :-) So doesn BenH, BTW.
Seriously: 2.4 kernel agp su
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:58:42AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Oooops! I just remembered that agpgart and/or radeon that come with 2.4
> > > kernel is not recent enough for dri.
> >
> > Arg, how am i going to fix this kind of things if nobody fills a bug
> > report about it ?
>
> You seem
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 01:08:29PM +0200, Kiko Piris wrote:
> On 06/04/2004 at 11:52, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your mail, Kiko. The fog is lifting!
>
> :-)))
>
> > Will it be easier for me to use 2.6? ppckernel.org doesn't have any 2.6
> > sources.
>
> Easier than what? ;-)
>
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:26:01PM +0200, Kiko Piris wrote:
> On 06/04/2004 at 10:53, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> > Still can't get it to work!
> >
> > lsmod doesn't show agpart or radeon. I then do 'insmod agpart' and then
> > 'insmod radeon'. Now it shows:
> >
> > Module
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 06:05:37PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Thanks Kiko.
>
> My kernel and modules installed from a fresh (beta3) install don't
> appear to have the uninorth-agp module.
They are builtin on 2.4.25-6 :
CONFIG_AGP_UNINORTH=y
Look at the /boot/config-2.4.25-powerpc fo
On 06/04/2004 at 11:52, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Thanks for your mail, Kiko. The fog is lifting!
:-)))
> Will it be easier for me to use 2.6? ppckernel.org doesn't have any 2.6
> sources.
Easier than what? ;-)
If you are upgrading from 2.4 to 2.6, you should read Dave Jones Post
Halloween
On 06/04/04, Kiko Piris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 06/04/2004 at 10:53, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > Still can't get it to work!
> >
> > lsmod doesn't show agpart or radeon. I then do 'insmod agpart' and then
> > 'insmod radeon'. Now it shows:
> Oooops! I just remembered that agpgart and/o
On 06/04/2004 at 10:53, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Still can't get it to work!
>
> lsmod doesn't show agpart or radeon. I then do 'insmod agpart' and then
> 'insmod radeon'. Now it shows:
>
> Module Size Used byNot tainted
> radeon116084 0 (unus
On 06/04/04, Mathieu Segaud ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Kiko Piris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 05/04/2004 at 18:05, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> >
> >> My kernel and modules installed from a fresh (beta3) install don't
> >> appear to have the uninorth-agp module.
> >
> > uninorth-agp is fro
Kiko Piris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 05/04/2004 at 18:05, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
>> Thanks Kiko.
>>
>> My kernel and modules installed from a fresh (beta3) install don't
>> appear to have the uninorth-agp module.
>
> uninorth-agp is from 2.6. If you use 2.4, IIRC, you only need agpga
On 05/04/2004 at 18:05, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Thanks Kiko.
>
> My kernel and modules installed from a fresh (beta3) install don't
> appear to have the uninorth-agp module.
uninorth-agp is from 2.6. If you use 2.4, IIRC, you only need agpgart
(and radeon, of course).
--
Kiko
Thanks Kiko.
My kernel and modules installed from a fresh (beta3) install don't
appear to have the uninorth-agp module.
Looks like I'm going to have to compile from scratch.
Since I'm going to do this, I'm keen to get a stable and easy way of
grabbing the sources with crypto, firewire, usb, hfs
Hi Rory
I think you have to compile AGP support into the kernel. It is a while
since I've done this and I used 2.4.23-ben1 kernel. However, I believe
that most of ben's patches are incorporated into the main ppc tree.
Let me know if you need me to dig around more but I suspect others on
the lis
On 05/04/2004 at 15:37, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available
> (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize -- falling back to PCI mode.
> (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] If this is an AGP card, you may want to make sure the
> agpgart
> kernel module is loaded before the r
I've just setup my new ibook2 800Mhz, and I can't get X to work
properly.
The logs show "AGP failed to initialize -- falling back to PCI mode."
How would I go about setting up "AGP" (whatever that is?).
Thanks for any help.
Rory
lspci:
00:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth/Pangea AG
53 matches
Mail list logo
