On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 08:02, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:57:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:31, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > > > BTW, where is : VMAP_4_ARGS supposed to be defined ? > > > > > > In the DRI CVS Makefile. You can just drop the guards, the idea is that > > > this code should only be used in drm-trunk-module-src if the current, > > > better solution doesn't work. > > > > Well, this didn't fix the problem, and i have no time to investigate > > this in the next month or so. > > Note that the fact that you get a lockup probably means that AGP does > get enabled, and it might be a different problem.
That was before i loaded the agpgart module first. When i do that, X works fine, but there is no DRI. The message is : drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci:0000:00:10.0 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 7 drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card1 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card2 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card3 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card4 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card5 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card6 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card7 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card8 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card9 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card10 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card11 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card12 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card13 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card14 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1023 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK) drmGetBusid returned '' (II) RADEON(0): [drm] DRM interface version 1.0 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] created "radeon" driver at busid "pci:0000:00:10.0" (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xeb2e7000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xeb2e7000 to 0x3001a000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0x98000000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel (II) RADEON(0): [agp] Mode 0x07000207 [AGP 0x106b/0x0027; Card 0x1002/0x4c57] (II) RADEON(0): [agp] 8192 kB allocated with handle 0xed2eb000 (II) RADEON(0): [agp] ring handle = 0x00000000 (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] Could not map ring (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI. (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel module is loaded before the radeon kernel module. (II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel (II) RADEON(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xeb2e7000 at 0x3001a000 and this in /var/log/syslog : Apr 15 07:30:06 debian kernel: Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann Apr 15 07:30:06 debian kernel: agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 565M Apr 15 07:30:06 debian kernel: agpgart: Detected Apple UniNorth/Pangea chipset Apr 15 07:30:06 debian kernel: agp: configuring for size idx: 4 Apr 15 07:30:06 debian kernel: agpgart: AGP aperture is 16M @ 0x0 Apr 15 07:30:32 debian kernel: [drm] AGP 0.99 Aperture @ 0x00000000 16MB Apr 15 07:30:32 debian kernel: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.7.0 20020828 on minor 0 Apr 15 07:30:32 debian kernel: [drm:radeon_unlock] *ERROR* Process 518 using kernel context 0 > > Michel, do you think it would make sense to backport a more recent copy > > of the drm modules to the older kernel, or do you see problems in doing > > this ? > > I do think that would be the best solution, preferably upstream. Well, i am maybe not the best person to do the backport upstream, but maybe let's already get it working in the debian package, and then strong of the experience suggest it happens upstream ? Friendly, Sven Luther
