> > I read him) cautioned against using more recent stuff until he got the > > new 2.6 framebuffer changed sorted out. From what I see in 2.6.5, that > > hasn't been completed yet (unless 2.6.5-rc3-ben0 is more broken than > > the mainstream kernel). > > Ok. Still, as far as debian is concerned, a 2.6.4 or 2.6.5 kernel > package is much more likely than the older versions, and you can always > try building the older radeonfb, 2.6.4 has both.
rivafb is the issue for me. Michael