On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:20:19PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 08:57:03PM -0700, Evan Martin wrote:
> > I'd like to reinstall with a better file system, but I read that Reiser
> > doesn't work with noflushd and XFS does.
>
> Err, does it? For all I know, noflushd sucks
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 08:57:03PM -0700, Evan Martin wrote:
> > I'd like to reinstall with a better file system, but I read that Reiser
> > doesn't work with noflushd and XFS does.
>
> Err, does it? For all I know, noflushd sucks with any journalling F
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 08:57:03PM -0700, Evan Martin wrote:
> I'd like to reinstall with a better file system, but I read that Reiser
> doesn't work with noflushd and XFS does.
Err, does it? For all I know, noflushd sucks with any journalling FS.
Do you remember where you read about XFS working
On Die, 2002-10-15 at 07:08, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Oct 14 2002, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > The 404s are because they are operating from a (apparently
> > incomplete) backup server.
>
> Is there any information on the girl which appears on the 404
> pages of penguinppc? :-)
It's Mrs
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 20:57:03 -0700, Evan Martin composed:
> I saw somewhere (was it this list?) that ext3 is what has been causing
> my laptop's hard drive to spin up every few seconds after it has spun down.
>
> I'd like to reinstall with a better file system, but I read that Reiser
> doesn
On Oct 14 2002, Chris Tillman wrote:
> The 404s are because they are operating from a (apparently
> incomplete) backup server.
Is there any information on the girl which appears on the 404
pages of penguinppc? :-)
Curiously yours, Roger... :-)
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 08:57:03PM -0700, Evan Martin wrote:
> I saw somewhere (was it this list?) that ext3 is what has been causing
> my laptop's hard drive to spin up every few seconds after it has spun down.
>
> I'd like to reinstall with a better file system, but I read that Reiser
> doesn'
Hi,
Kevin van Haaren writes:
> does the benh patch package give me anything different from doing an
> rsync against rsync.penguinppc.org?
Im Prinzip ja. It gives you the infrastructure to use the patch with
all those nifty tools that make kernel building on Debian so much
easier. As far as the
On Tuesday, September 25, 2001, at 03:00 PM, Kevin van Haaren wrote
does the benh patch package give me anything different from doing an
rsync against rsync.penguinppc.org?
include/linux/version.h from my latest rsync is:
#define UTS_RELEASE "2.4.10-ben0"
I assume I can just apply the xfs
At 9:28 PM +0200 9/24/01, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
Hi,
Jens Schmalzing writes:
I will package patches for -xfs and -benh kernels.
Just wanted to tell you that with 2.4.10 out, I have packaged the
above-mentioned patches. I will upload to auric tomorrow, right now
they can be found at
deb h
Hi,
Ethan Benson writes:
> can we get a kernel-image-powerpc-xfs too? thats the only way
> boot-floppies can get support for this.
Sure, if an image based on the benh and xfs patches is fine I can
package that. But I will wait until kernel-source-2.4.10 arrives, in
order to not depend on a non
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 09:28:09PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jens Schmalzing writes:
>
> > I will package patches for -xfs and -benh kernels.
>
> Just wanted to tell you that with 2.4.10 out, I have packaged the
> above-mentioned patches. I will upload to auric tomorrow, right now
Hi,
Jens Schmalzing writes:
> I will package patches for -xfs and -benh kernels.
Just wanted to tell you that with 2.4.10 out, I have packaged the
above-mentioned patches. I will upload to auric tomorrow, right now
they can be found at
deb http://people.debian.org ~jensen/binary-powerpc/
Fee
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:52:14PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
>
> Right now, I have open ITPs for two packages, but when I finish those
> and nobody beats me to it, I will package patches for -xfs and -benh
> kernels. This is *not* an ITP, so go for it yourself if you feel like
> it.
good, th
At 2:07 PM +0200 9/19/01, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Kevin van Haaren wrote:
>Are you using one of the PPC trees as a basis? PPC isn't fully merged
>into Linus' yet AFAIK.
No, I wasn't sure I could apply an XFS patch against a PPC tree, or a
PPC patch against an XFS patched source so I avoided i
Kevin van Haaren wrote:
> >Are you using one of the PPC trees as a basis? PPC isn't fully merged
> >into Linus' yet AFAIK.
>
> No, I wasn't sure I could apply an XFS patch against a PPC tree, or a
> PPC patch against an XFS patched source so I avoided it. Or is there
> a PPC tree with XFS applie
Hi,
Sven Luther writes:
> huh ? where did you looked at it ? i just found
>
> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.0.1/kernel_patches
>
> which has 2.4.5 only.
A number of patches against more recent kernels are at [1]. I
downloaded version 2.4.10-pre8. It applied nicely (read:
At 10:23 AM +0200 9/19/01, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Woody has a patch for XFS. It's against kernel 2.4.5. There is NO
kernel-source package for 2.4.5. So there appears to be no way to do
a debian package XFS kernel install at this time.
You can build kernel packages with kernel-package fro
At 12:14 PM +0200 9/19/01, Sven wrote:
huh ? where did you looked at it ? i just found
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.0.1/kernel_patches
which has 2.4.5 only.
That said, on the download page, you can read :
XFS patches are also available in Debian-unstable ("Sid")
which s
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:23:29AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Kevin van Haaren wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 02:21:37AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > Laurent de Segur wrote:
> > >
> > > Not my experience, when I looked more than a week ago, their FTP
> > > site already had patches
Kevin van Haaren wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 02:21:37AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > Laurent de Segur wrote:
> >
> > Not my experience, when I looked more than a week ago, their FTP
> > site already had patches for early .10-pre versions.
>
> OK, I spent most of the weekend trying to ge
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 02:21:37AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> Laurent de Segur wrote:
>
> > It's too bad that the XFS module (at least on ppc) is not part of the
> > pre-compiled kernel image (ReiserFS is),
>
> Not really, you still need patches (at least Alan Cox's) to use ReiserFS on
> big e
22 matches
Mail list logo
