> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
>>> I could upload my chroot by end of the week. Is this helpful?
>>
>> I'm already tinkering with multistrapping a chroot from
>> snapshot.debian.org (currently trying May 9 2011). If I'm lucky this
>> will soon work. So now I have a doub
David Kuehling wrote:
BTW are there any special test-cases you use for testing your changes?
So far I can only imagine to put this in a chroot and see whether it
"works".
libc has a testsuite of its own. The only things that were failing were
the same failures as for powerpc and some floatingpo
David Kuehling wrote:
One thing that's worth mentioning, if the GNU ld patches that
Sebastian proposed got fully merged then any patches solely fixing
"lwsync" issues are no longer really relevant. Specifically, GNU ld
now autoconverts "lwsync" into the appropriate "msync" instruction
when assem
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
> David Kuehling wrote:
>>> One thing that's worth mentioning, if the GNU ld patches that
>>> Sebastian proposed got fully merged then any patches solely fixing
>>> "lwsync" issues are no longer really relevant. Specifically, GNU ld
>>> now
> "Kyle" == Kyle Moffett writes:
>> Looks like this part is rather trivial. You still have 2 short
>> patches, both of which have not gone to eglibc upstream nor into
>> debian sid (as far as I can see, eglibc.org is currently down).
>>
>> I'll file bug reports and send you the fixed source
On Jul 04, 2011, at 05:31, David Kuehling wrote:
> "Kyle" == Kyle Moffett writes:
>> I would try to forward-port the eglibc patches from the "unreleased"
>> repo to the latest sid version and file new bugs (or update existing
>> ones and pester the maintainers).
>
> Looks like this part is rather
> "Kyle" == Kyle Moffett writes:
> On Jul 01, 2011, at 16:17, David Kuehling wrote:
>> "Kyle" == Kyle Moffett writes:
1. Nowadays some required packages depend on the metapackage
'multiarch-support' (e.g. 'libselinux1'). However
'multiarch-support' is only provided by newer e
On Jul 01, 2011, at 16:17, David Kuehling wrote:
> "Kyle" == Kyle Moffett writes:
>>> 1. Nowadays some required packages depend on the metapackage
>>> 'multiarch-support' (e.g. 'libselinux1'). However
>>> 'multiarch-support' is only provided by newer eglibc packages, not by
>>> the eglibc package
> "Kyle" == Kyle Moffett writes:
[..]
>> 1. Nowadays some required packages depend on the metapackage
>> 'multiarch-support' (e.g. 'libselinux1'). However
>> 'multiarch-support' is only provided by newer eglibc packages, not by
>> the eglibc package currently found in the powerpcspe archive
Kyle Moffett wrote:
just found out that with the current state of the powerpcspe port [1] I
cannot multistrap even a rudimentary debian system. A few months ago
multistrap worked without problems.
Yeah, unfortunately my time to deal with the whole thing lately has been
extremely limited, and w
On Jul 01, 2011, at 09:04, David Kuehling wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
> just found out that with the current state of the powerpcspe port [1] I
> cannot multistrap even a rudimentary debian system. A few months ago
> multistrap worked without problems.
Yeah, unfortunately my time to deal with the whole th
11 matches
Mail list logo
