Hi Ben
Good news: since I'm using 2.4.22+ben1, the blackouts have not happened again.
BTW I did try to compile 2.4.21(+enbd+freeswan)+ben3, but it croaked
while compiling DRM. I then fetched 2.4.22 and applied ..22-ben1 (and
freeswan again iirc), but it still croaked at the same place, so I
r
> BTW the blackouts generally happen, when I press more than one key
> for waking it up (the lombard does not wakeup just by opening the lid
> (which is ok for me), it needs some key press), and it has been
> aslept for at least about an hour. (It does also happen when it is
> connected to powe
At 17:31 Uhr +0200 12.08.2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 16:35, Christian Jaeger wrote:
At 16:05 Uhr +0200 12.08.2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>Can you verify if moving atyfb from 2.4.18 to 2.4.21 helps with sleep ?
You mean using the following files from 2.4.
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 16:35, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> At 16:05 Uhr +0200 12.08.2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >Can you verify if moving atyfb from 2.4.18 to 2.4.21 helps with sleep ?
>
> You mean using the following files from 2.4.18?:
> ./drivers/video/aty128.h
> ./drivers/video/aty128fb.
At 16:05 Uhr +0200 12.08.2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Can you verify if moving atyfb from 2.4.18 to 2.4.21 helps with sleep ?
You mean using the following files from 2.4.18?:
./drivers/video/aty128.h
./drivers/video/aty128fb.c
./drivers/video/aty/atyfb.h
./drivers/video/aty/atyfb_base.c
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du mardi 12 août 2003, vers
14:20, Christian Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> BTW I would really like to be able to use the fn key setting ability
> as present in pbbuttonsd/powerprefs from scripts. It's tiresome to
> always have to start pbbuttonsd (and sh
Can you verify if moving atyfb from 2.4.18 to 2.4.21 helps with sleep ?
In general, you can try moving some old code that relates to your
machine (pmac specific stuffs or drivers) to 2.4.21 and check...
One possiblity would be USB, did you try if usb-ohci driver
isn't loaded ?
Ben.
At 15:23 Uhr +0200 12.08.2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Tell me if you want me to try other patches.
Do the problem also happen if you don't have the CD-ROM in the
media bay ?
Yes, I have removed my cdrom drive for ages now, since I've moved the
battery from the left to the right bay
> BTW, maybe related, maybe not: every now and then (about the same
> frequency as the poweroffs, maybe less) the display does not switch
> on the backlight on wakeup. Putting the powerbook to sleep (closing
> lid) and wakening it up again "solves" it. This happened with and
> without your pat
(Continuing the thread from january 20th this year.)
Sorry that I've let you wait so long for an answer. I didn't have the
time back then to do more tests, and so lived with the old reliable
2.4.18 kernel in the meantime. Recently I've upgraded to 2.4.21, and
the wakeup "poweroffs" have happen
At 12:18 Uhr +0100 23.01.2003, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Which revision of the MPC106 do you have? Older versions don't support 4-bank
SDRAM, only 2-bank SDRAM. If you try 4-bank SDRAM in a system with a north
bridge that doesn't support it (e.g. the Golden Gate II in my LongTrail), it
either see
Can you try that patch and let me know if it helps ?
Ben.
# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux 2.4 for PowerPC
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
#
At 23:26 Uhr -0800 22.01.2003, vinai wrote:
The memory controller for the Lombard is the MPC106 (a.k.a. "Grackle")
and according to the specs from Motorola (if I read them correctly),
should be able to address up to 1 GB of RAM.
Sounds cool.
I think the firmware upgrade and 1G of RAM support
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, vinai wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> > Oh, I don't have the 512MB RAM anymore. Based of the claims of the
> > technician that the lombard doesn't support more than 512MB and the
> > fact that there wasn't a firmware upgrade to be found I believed that
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> Oh, I don't have the 512MB RAM anymore. Based of the claims of the
> technician that the lombard doesn't support more than 512MB and the
> fact that there wasn't a firmware upgrade to be found I believed that
> it's simply not possible - is this wron
Hello,
Sorry I've been delayed with answering.
At 11:50 Uhr +0100 20.01.2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 05:04, Christian Jaeger wrote:
Hello
3 weeks ago I've compiled a stock kernel.org 2.4.20 kernel and
replaced the previously used 2.4.18 one. I took the 2.4.18 .
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 05:04, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> Hello
>
> 3 weeks ago I've compiled a stock kernel.org 2.4.20 kernel and
> replaced the previously used 2.4.18 one. I took the 2.4.18 .config
> and added a second wirelesslan driver (and maybe a few other
> modules). About 5 weeks ago I upg
Hello
3 weeks ago I've compiled a stock kernel.org 2.4.20 kernel and
replaced the previously used 2.4.18 one. I took the 2.4.18 .config
and added a second wirelesslan driver (and maybe a few other
modules). About 5 weeks ago I upgraded my RAM to 256+512MB (from
which only 2*256 were recognize
18 matches
Mail list logo
