Hi ,
I am trying to build rootfs for powerpc based (mpc8360) board.
Etch is working using debootstrap..But when I tried lenny it is not
working
I am using initramfs to boot lenny/etch using the "exec switch_root newroot
/sbin/init"
Does any one know the reason.
Thanks
Raghu
Good question, Amos.
You should begin with listing the files:
ls -al /mnt2
What do you get? Usually there are links vmlinux and initrd.img
pointing at vmlinux-2.6.x.x.x and initrd.img-2.6.x.x.x, respectively.
They should come from a package called linux-image-2.6 or something
similar. You can se
Risto,
Thanks for the continued support. I continued through the
installation to the partitions portions, and all of the partitions
were as I thought - sda6 is the hfsplus partition where OS 9 is
loaded. I then continued all the way through the installation to the
point where I was inst
Hmm... looks like /dev/sda does not exist, yet. But somewhere under
the /dev tree there are probably the right entries. Perhaps /dev/scsi
or /dev/bus or /dev/disk something.
You could just try to let the installation process continue a bit
further. When it's about to start the partitioning, the sd
Risto,
Thanks much for your response. I followed your directions, but after
issuing this command: "mount -t hfsplus /dev/sda6 /mnt1", I received
the following text: "mount: Mounting /dev/sda6 on /mnt1 failed: No
such device."
I also made attempts with "hfs" and "sda5", but received the s
Hi Amos,
The one thing you probably forgot, was to copy the vmlinux and
initrd.img images from /boot to Mac OS 'Linux Kernels' folder. Then
you will have to direct BootX to use them, as you did with the images
from the install CD.
Now you must try to re-start the installation and then suspend it
0)
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown
block(0,0)
<0>Rebooting in 180 seconds. . ."
I've attempted to scour the internet for information on where to go
from here, but seem to be coming up empty handed. Any advice that I
can get on where to go from here would be much appreciated.
Amos
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~josejx/diskdev_cmds-332.11.patch.bz2 which
> applies to the latest version of the Apple source found here:
> http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/tarballs/apsl/diskdev_cmds-332.11.tar.gz
>
> It's still not 100% complete yet, checking if the partition is mounted
> isn't do
David Moreno Garza wrote:
On 16:03 Wed 04 Jan 2006, Florian E wrote:
Jose Jezak already did. on bugs.gentoo.org is a ebuild, not included in
gentoo's portage tree yet, but it works fine on my iBook G4 (unstable
ppc-gentoo aka ~ppc).
Where exactly?
http://dev.gentoo.org/~josejx/diskdev_cm
> unable to mount it under Linux to perform the needed operations. It complains:
>
> HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.
Just to get a simpler map over here: You were mounting rw the iPod and
then unplugged it without unmounting and then you could mount it but
witho
On 16:03 Wed 04 Jan 2006, Florian E wrote:
> Jose Jezak already did. on bugs.gentoo.org is a ebuild, not included in
> gentoo's portage tree yet, but it works fine on my iBook G4 (unstable
> ppc-gentoo aka ~ppc).
Where exactly?
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.ne
I might be on the wrong track, but is journalling disabled? Because it
should be. Just had a similar problem with a OSX hfsplus hard disk
under linux...
Kasper
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
If you are willing to disable the code that forces the read-only mount
at linux kernel, I can send you a patch.
The proper "fix" is for somebody to port to linux the hfsplus fsck
program in darwin ... The licence is good enough for inclusion in linux
distros.
Ben
Jesus Climent wrote:
> Otherwise, I am now using MacOSX to transfer things to my iPod.
¡Hola!
I don't know if it possible (I've no iPod) but have you tryed to check and
repair various times the iPod disk with the MacOS X disk utility?
Yannick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
> If you are willing to disable the code that forces the read-only mount
> at linux kernel, I can send you a patch.
The proper "fix" is for somebody to port to linux the hfsplus fsck
program in darwin ... The licence is good enough for inclusion in linux
distros.
Ben.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:45:36PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:40:22PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Greetings, Mr. Data!
> >
> > At this document,
> >
> > http://www.e-vse.com/csi/doc/hfs/Release%201.0A/HFS%20Provisional.pdf
> >
> > look for the WAKEUP command
I converted my HFS-formatted iPod to VFAT as soon as I got it, and
it's worked reliably with Linux ever since. I don't use it with OSX
regularly, but I just checked and iTunes at least sees its contents
just fine.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:40:22PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings, Mr. Data!
>
> At this document,
>
> http://www.e-vse.com/csi/doc/hfs/Release%201.0A/HFS%20Provisional.pdf
>
> look for the WAKEUP command. It says (quote):
>
> 'Certain parts of the HFS are necessarily single-thread
ed my iPod from the computer before unmounting it. It
> refused to mount rw, so i used hpfsck to destroy the contents of my iPod.
>
> Mac OS X came into rescue to restore the white gadget, but there after i am
> unable to mount it under Linux to perform the needed operations. It compla
. It complains:
HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.
I have tried to erase the whole thing by dd'ing /dev/zero to the device and
restoring the whole thing under Mac OS X, which has no troubles accessing and
modifying the filesystem, but which has no references to the lock
On 17/11/05, Paul TT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:27:49 +0100
> Federico Pistono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I commented the initrd.img in the yaboot file, and now it works
perfectly. Damn it, searching for all possible mistakes inthe kernel
config, and in the end it was that
w
>
> was of course
> cp vmlinux /boot/vmlinux.new
> (vi /etc/yaboot.conf)
> ybin-v
>
> Sorry, Anyway I did it correctly when compiling the kernel.
did you rebuild the initrd image for the new compiled kernel?
the root fs driver is compiled internally?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On 16/11/05, Federico Pistono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI.
>
Sorry, I made a mistake in writing the email, the following line
> cp bzImage /boot/vmlinux.new
was of course
cp vmlinux /boot/vmlinux.new
(vi /etc/yaboot.conf)
ybin-v
Sorry, Anyway I did it correctly when compiling the kernel.
-
/vmlinux.old
label=old
read-only
initrd=/boot/initrd.img
The complete error says:
UDF-fs No partition found(1)
hotsync VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown block(3,4)
http://www.google.it/search?q=hotsync+VFS%3A+unable+to+mount+root+fs+on+unknown+block&start=0&start=0&
Yes, that's what i have done
A hfs+ partition and under debian a 2.6.12 kernel
compiled with hfs support. And then
mount -t hfsplus /dev/hd /mnt/osx
Work great, read and write with out any problems.
Thx all :)
--- Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Jul 01 2005, sascha brossmann
On Jul 01 2005, Aaron Macks wrote:
> you also might want to look into
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fsx/
> I don't know much about it, but it would allow you to have total
> filesystem compatibility, linux<->osx .
But some Mac applications didn't seem to w
you also might want to look into
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fsx/
I don't know much about it, but it would allow you to have total
filesystem compatibility, linux<->osx . Unless you use XFS or JFS,
in which case you'd have to create a new partition
aaron
--
-
Aaron Macks([E
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 16:19 +0200, sascha brossmann wrote:
> iirc ext3 is (roughly put) ext2 + journalling, and thus ext3 partitions
> should be accessible with an ext2 driver. the ext2 driver for os x does
> currently *not* work properly with tiger though, as apple changed the
> kernel interface[
On Jul 01 2005, sascha brossmann wrote:
> consequently, in order to share a hd partition between os x 10.4 and
> linux you currently have to use atavistic atrocities like FAT
> instead or resort to networking.
I use the hfsplus module in Linux to get access to HFS+ formatted
filesystems and it wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
on 6/28/05 9:51 PM, Kasper Jordaens wrote:
> I had the same problem.. eventually I reformatted my home-partition to
> ext3 wich works ok
>
> check
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fsx/
>
> I just see that it is ext2 on the page but I believe
I had the same problem.. eventually I reformatted my home-partition to
ext3 wich works ok
check
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fsx/
I just see that it is ext2 on the page but I believe I'm using ext3...
I'll check later today (in OSX now)
Kasper
essage (i don't remember exactly, i
don't have my ibook with me at this time)
So, i would like to know if os x 10.4 can read and
write on reiserfs and if it can't, witch FS could i
use for my partition to be access from both os ?
Thx :)
Kohz
--- Maximilian Gerlach <[EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Last night I booted, and after I'd logged in I looked at dumpe2fs for
> the /home fs - although I'd only just mounted it, the 'last mount time'
> was Mon Aug 22 02:33:35 2005 instead of the expected Wed Jun 15 23:45:0
tamed, so I'm not
having to poweroff/boot very often now.
Last night I booted, and after I'd logged in I looked at dumpe2fs for
the /home fs - although I'd only just mounted it, the 'last mount time'
was Mon Aug 22 02:33:35 2005 instead of the expected Wed Jun 15 23:4
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:29:38PM +0800, William Xuuu wrote:
> Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:16:45PM +0800, William Xuuu wrote:
> >> Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:56:45PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECT
Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:16:45PM +0800, William Xuuu wrote:
>> Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:56:45PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well, when i first installed debian, the kernel was
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:16:45PM +0800, William Xuuu wrote:
> Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:56:45PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Well, when i first installed debian, the kernel was only 2.4.23, and
> couldn't recognize my ATA harddisk c
gt; with initrd support, but was unable to boot the new kernel, which stops
>> at:
>>
>> Please append a correct "root=" boot option
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
>> unknown-block..
>>
>> In `/'
to boot the new kernel, which stops
>>at:
>>
>>Please append a correct "root=" boot option
>>Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
>>unknown-block..
>>
>>In `/' i have:
>>
>>/initrd.img ->
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:56:45PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> os: debian on an ibook(G4, 1G, 12")
>
> I've just installed a new kernel image (kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc)
> with initrd support, but was unable to boot the new kernel, which stops
> at:
[ ... ]
> ==
c - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block..
In `/' i have:
/initrd.img -> boot/initrd.img-2.6.11-powerpc
/vmlinux -> boot/vmlinux-2.6.11-powerpc
/vmlinux.old -> boot/vmlinux-2.6.9
and in `yaboot.conf':
=
boot=/de
t; at:
>
> Please append a correct "root=" boot option
> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
> unknown-block..
>
> In `/' i have:
>
> /initrd.img -> boot/initrd.img-2.6.11-powerpc
> /vmlinux -> boot/vmlinux-2
Hi,
os: debian on an ibook(G4, 1G, 12")
I've just installed a new kernel image (kernel-image-2.6.11-powerpc)
with initrd support, but was unable to boot the new kernel, which stops
at:
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Una
Hello.
I've bought a iBook G4 and still want to keep my Kyocera laser printer.
I know that this model is a little bit old fashioned, but it produces
fine results.
With my other linux box (x86-PC(already sold) with Debian 3.0)I had no
problems to get it running, but now some have occured:
- Is th
Hi,
today i compiled the 2.6.9 kernel using the config file
http://home.zonnet.nl/vgeloven/powerbook-g4-linux-kernel-configuration/config-2.6.9-pbg4-20041020.bz2
Unfortunately I'm getting an Error, when i try to boot the new kernel:
kernel panic: not syncing VFS: unable to mount root
..
> 4. Regarding HFS+ on the iPod. Given the state of HFS+ support in
> Linux, you may be better off converting your iPod to FAT. Even
>though this will turn it into a so-called Windows iPod, it will
>remain usable from Mac OS X.
excellent. that sounds like the best soluti
Hi,
Nori Heikkinen writes:
> i just got a new iPod, and have been happily mounting and unmounting
> it on my debian box (x86) with the mount command all morning.
[confusion galore]
Let me try to clear up things a bit.
1. Regarding device nodes. You are accessing the iPod either via
Firewir
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 03:08:16PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> it seems that i want to use hpmount and hpumount to mount and unmount
> the iPod now (that's kind of weird, but okay). but maybe i'm
> misunderstanding how it works. when i say:
>
> homeruns:~# hpmount /dev/sda /mnt/ipod
>
> i ge
hi,
i just got a new iPod, and have been happily mounting and unmounting
it on my debian box (x86) with the mount command all morning.
however, it suddenly stopped working read-write, saying in the logs:
HFS+-fs warning: Filesystem was not cleanly unmounted, running
fsck.hfsplus is recommended
first few sectors
where the relevant bit was flipped so maybe mount or the kernel misses
something upon unmounting an hfsplus volume?
-Thomas
--
[1]
# mount -t hfsplus /dev/hda2 /osx -o rw
# mount | grep osx
/dev/hda2 on /osx type hfsplus (rw)
# dmesg | tail -1
HFS+-fs warning: Filesystem wa
first few sectors
where the relevant bit was flipped so maybe mount or the kernel misses
something upon unmounting an hfsplus volume?
-Thomas
--
[1]
# mount -t hfsplus /dev/hda2 /osx -o rw
# mount | grep osx
/dev/hda2 on /osx type hfsplus (rw)
# dmesg | tail -1
HFS+-fs warning: Filesystem wa
fine when I tried to use it, but remember that it is usually
case-insensitive, which means, that some Unix programs may have problems
with it.
BTW, I would recommend that you disable the journalling of the FS, if you
want the changes in Linux to be recognized without problems in MacOS X.
I'd li
On Tue 08/10/04 14:30, Albert Dengg wrote:
> Hi
> a friend of mine wants to use some data on his external harddrive both
> on OSX and linux (x86) and so the questions is, what is the status of
> the hfsplus driver under linux, is it save to use and does it work both
> read and write?
I use hfs+ da
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:30:19 +0200
Albert Dengg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AD> Hi
AD> a friend of mine wants to use some data on his external harddrive
AD> both on OSX and linux (x86) and so the questions is, what is the
AD> status of the hfsplus driver under linux, is it save to use and does
AD>
Hi
a friend of mine wants to use some data on his external harddrive both
on OSX and linux (x86) and so the questions is, what is the status of
the hfsplus driver under linux, is it save to use and does it work both
read and write?
thanks in advance
yours
albert
ps: i hope this is the correct li
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 14:02, Harvey Ussery wrote:
> I recently installed (from official CD set) DebPPC3.0(Woody) on 800Mhz
> iMac 17" LCD. When it came time to install/format the filesystem I was
> only given the option of ext2, which surprised me, since ext3 has been
> available for some time.
Harvey Ussery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recently installed (from official CD set) DebPPC3.0(Woody) on
> 800Mhz iMac 17" LCD. When it came time to install/format the
> filesystem I was only given the option of ext2, which surprised me,
> since ext3 has been available for some time. Did I miss
Interesting that you should mention this, Harvey, as I was just looking
through some ext3 documentation today. By far the best rundown on the
features and tweaks of ext3 is Andrew Morton's, at
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ext3-usage.html
Furthermore, Daniel Robbins has a couple of artic
I recently installed (from official CD set) DebPPC3.0(Woody) on 800Mhz
iMac 17" LCD. When it came time to install/format the filesystem I was
only given the option of ext2, which surprised me, since ext3 has been
available for some time. Did I miss something? (I know that you add a -j
to the fo
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 11:20:35AM -0800, Johan en Katrien Dewaele wrote:
> Hi,
> > > > > I acquired this old Mac PPC 4400/200
...
> One thing I noticed and find very strange: when I zap
> the PRAM (alt-cmd P R) I almost immediatly get the
> white screen with the arrow and then the Mac searche
Hi,
> > > > I acquired this old Mac PPC 4400/200
> > When boot-floppy boots I get a nice screenoutput
> with
> > the penguin on top : kernel detects following
> (dmesg
> > output) :
> >
> > MacOs display is /bandit/ATY,264VT
> > Using unsupported 640x480 ATY,264VT at 81800480,
> > depth=8, pitch=
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:57:51PM -0800, Johan en Katrien Dewaele wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> --- Chris Tillman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:56:56AM -0700, Johan en
> > Katrien Dewaele wrote:
> > > Hi people,
> > > I need your help/advice on this one : I'm a newbie
> > in
acquired this old Mac PPC 4400/200
> > wants to mount root fs I get following error :
> > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
> 03:40.
> > Rebooting in 180 seconds.
> >
> Thanks for applying all the wisdom available in the
> manual and so on
> before
nux.bin in the
> BootX-kernel-map, choose /dev/hdb2 as root-device and
> choose Linux as OS.
>
> So when I now try to boot using this
> BootX-configuration: kernel boots, the 2 HD + CD are
> detected, partition check goes ok but when the kernel
> wants to mount root fs I get fo
the kernel
wants to mount root fs I get following error :
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:40.
Rebooting in 180 seconds.
I relaunched the installer with the floppies and here
I CAN mount /dev/hdb2 on /target.
What am I missing? Are there any other kernel
parameters I should add ?
I
On 2002.03.06 11:01 Ron Farrer wrote:
Hello,
I just moved a disk to my PM9600 from an Alpha. It's a 68-pin
UltraWide
SCSI, 23.2GB drive. It has a 68-pin -> 50-pin converter on it. My
problem is Linux (2.4.17) doesn't seem to want to mount it, when
trying
to do so it says "mount: /dev/sdc6: unkn
Hi,
Ron Farrer writes:
> *egg on face*
[X] SEND PIX!
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!
Jens Schmalzing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Just a wild guess, is CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION set in your kernel config?
Ooops.. That was the problem.. *egg on face*
Thanks,
Ron
--
Email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
Ron Farrer writes:
> fine. So my question is, why can't I get Linux to mount any
> partitions from this disk?
Just a wild guess, is CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION set in your kernel config?
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 08:07:52AM -0800, Ron Farrer wrote:
> > My
> > problem is Linux (2.4.17) doesn't seem to want to mount it, when trying
> > to do so it says "mount: /dev/sdc6: unknown device". mac-fdisk also says
> > there is no readable partitions on the disk, however cfdisk correctly
> > s
Ron Farrer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just moved a disk to my PM9600 from an Alpha. It's a 68-pin UltraWide
> SCSI, 23.2GB drive. It has a 68-pin -> 50-pin converter on it. My
> problem is Linux (2.4.17) doesn't seem to want to mount it, when trying
> to do so it says "mount: /dev/
Hello,
I just moved a disk to my PM9600 from an Alpha. It's a 68-pin UltraWide
SCSI, 23.2GB drive. It has a 68-pin -> 50-pin converter on it. My
problem is Linux (2.4.17) doesn't seem to want to mount it, when trying
to do so it says "mount: /dev/sdc6: unknown device". mac-fdisk also says
there i
Wilhelm Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Incidently, I was wondering the other day if I moved /var /usr and
> /etc to their own partitions, is there any reason why / needs to get
> mounted rw at all?
You also need /dev mounted rw. Devfs is a nice way to get around
this.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 12:36:12AM -0700, Wilhelm Fitzpatrick wrote:
> M... yes, this is the case for me... And yes, it probably would be
> better to have var on a seperate partition for times like these...
>
> Incidently, I was wondering the other day if I moved /var /usr and /etc to
> thei
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Wilhelm Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 12:22:47PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > Odd. Both of those imply that the kernel found the FS to be broken
> > > somehow and remounted it read-onl
On Sat, 11 Aug 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 12:22:47PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Odd. Both of those imply that the kernel found the FS to be broken
> > somehow and remounted it read-only to prevent further damage.
>
> debian always puts
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 12:22:47PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> Odd. Both of those imply that the kernel found the FS to be broken
> somehow and remounted it read-only to prevent further damage.
debian always puts errors=remount-ro in the / filesystem mount option
in /etc/fstab. if /var
k
> > > from sleep (running 2.4.8pre4-ben0) I noticed that the root file system
> > > was suddenly mounted read-only. I rebooted and everything was fine.
> >
> > Can you check /var/log/messages and /var/log/kern.log? It sounds like
> > when you woke the machine up the
ddenly mounted read-only. I rebooted and everything was fine.
>
> Can you check /var/log/messages and /var/log/kern.log? It sounds like
> when you woke the machine up the fs was 'bad' and got mounted read-only.
> When you booted up again did it fsck?
Yes, it did fsck, an
Can you check /var/log/messages and /var/log/kern.log? It sounds like
when you woke the machine up the fs was 'bad' and got mounted read-only.
When you booted up again did it fsck?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
I experience a weird symptom the other day. After waking up my TiBook
from sleep (running 2.4.8pre4-ben0) I noticed that the root file system
was suddenly mounted read-only. I rebooted and everything was fine.
This has only happened once, but it was sufficiently weird to cause me to
ask if anyb
Jason E. Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Michel Daenzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> AFAIK that should only yet be a problem with gcc-3.0 (which in turn is needed
>> for ReiserFS yet).
> Speaking as one who would really like to have a journali
MC wrote:
>
> Before using ReiserFS (or any other filesystem) on a production system,
> or a system where you care about the data, I would suggest waiting until
You can stop right there. You should not be using 2.4 kernels on
any production system, not until at least 2.4.7. So says Alan Cox
and
Before using ReiserFS (or any other filesystem) on a production system,
or a system where you care about the data, I would suggest waiting until
at least one or two minor kernel releases have appeared in which there
have been no fixes for the filesystem.
There were fixes to ReiserFS in both 2.4.2
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:03:11PM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
>
> Speaking as one who would really like to have a journaling FS on my
> 80Gb FW drive, is ResierFS ready for use on PPC? What about XFS??
reiserfs is not even ready for primetime on x86, there is some pretty
severe f
gcc-3.0 (which in turn is
> > > needed for ReiserFS yet).
> >
> > Speaking as one who would really like to have a journaling FS on my
> > 80Gb FW drive, is ResierFS ready for use on PPC?
>
> 'Ready' may be a bit exaggerated, but I've been using it as my
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> > AFAIK that should only yet be a problem with gcc-3.0 (which in turn is
> > needed for ReiserFS yet).
>
> Speaking as one who would really like to have a journaling FS on my
> 80Gb FW drive, is ResierFS ready for use on PPC?
'
"Michel Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAIK that should only yet be a problem with gcc-3.0 (which in turn is needed
> for ReiserFS yet).
Speaking as one who would really like to have a journaling FS on my
80Gb FW drive, is ResierFS ready for use on PPC? What about XFS??
Thanks!
jas.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:13:59AM -0800, Lucien S Carroll wrote:
> This may well be an easy question, but i can't find anything on it. What
> does this error mean? kernel panic: VFS: unable to mount fs
it means you neglected to specify your root partition with
root=/dev/hdaXX in /etc/
This may well be an easy question, but i can't find anything on it. What
does this error mean? kernel panic: VFS: unable to mount fs
I've a blue G3 running OS 8.6. Whether I boot via bootx or yaboot, i get
this same error message right after it checks the partitions and scans for
RAID s
which I can mount via
> NFS? I need at least a temporary root fs to mount so that I can get the
I remember Alan Cox writing a hack to piggyback the compressed ramdisk on
the kernel image for netbooting. I don't think I still have that code but
he might have kept it around.
You can lo
ia
NFS? I need at least a temporary root fs to mount so that I can get the
base system installed. I tried to mount the floppies after I wrote the
images to them, but I don't know what the fs type is for them. Can
anybody help with either of these two questions?
Eric
I installed Debian PowerPC while enabling the new ext2 features (the ones
that work only with 2.2.x kernels) in the installer. It seems to make
things faster, especially when booting but has a big drawback: I can't
access my Linux partitions with LinuxDisks anymore! No one seems to
be developpin
93 matches
Mail list logo
