Re: Another plug for a debian PowerPC FAQ for Apple systems ...

Hello Ken, On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 16:46 -0700, Ken Cunningham wrote: > As per the last time this came up a couple of years ago, the same set of > questions with the same series of answers keep coming up every few months > on this list regarding installing debian on PowerPC macs. Adding to this, it

Re: Another plug for a debian PowerPC FAQ for Apple systems ...

On 2024-09-27, at 4:50 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I think there's a curated FAQ for PowerPC on the Debian wiki at > . Also see > . > > Jeff Thanks Jeff, I recall you were one of the folks interested in spearheading a curr

Another plug for a debian PowerPC FAQ for Apple systems ...

As per the last time this came up a couple of years ago, the exact same set of questions with the exact same series of answers keep coming up every few months on this list regarding installing debian on PowerPC macs. We had a few keen volunteers back then who were interested in spearheading such

Re: Another plug for a debian PowerPC FAQ for Apple systems ...

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 7:47 PM Ken Cunningham wrote: > > As per the last time this came up a couple of years ago, the same set of > questions with the same series of answers keep coming up every few months on > this list regarding installing debian on PowerPC macs. > > We had a few keen volunte

Another plug for a debian PowerPC FAQ for Apple systems ...

As per the last time this came up a couple of years ago, the same set of questions with the same series of answers keep coming up every few months on this list regarding installing debian on PowerPC macs. We had a few keen volunteers back then who were interested in spearheading a FAQ to help p

Move Debian PowerPC web pages to the Debian wiki

Hi Everyone/Adrian, I'm looking at pages like https://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/ and https://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/inst/pmac. I believe the pages are under control of the Debian webmasters. I think the pages should be moved to a wiki so the community can maintain them. The biggest reaso

Re: Problem installing Debian PowerPC Jessie on PowerMac G5 7,3 PCI-X

Thanks! Karl > Am 19.05.2019 um 21:17 schrieb Rick Thomas : > > Scroll the list of mirrors all the way to the top. (you can use the up-arrow > key repeatedly, or the home key once) You’ll see an “enter manually” option > there. > > Rick > >> On May 19, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Noah Wolfe wrote:

Re: Problem installing Debian PowerPC Jessie on PowerMac G5 7,3 PCI-X

Scroll the list of mirrors all the way to the top. (you can use the up-arrow key repeatedly, or the home key once) You’ll see an “enter manually” option there. Rick > On May 19, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Noah Wolfe wrote: > > Hey Rick, > > Quick question, how do you manually enter repositories at

Re: Problem installing Debian PowerPC Jessie on PowerMac G5 7,3 PCI-X

Hey Rick, Quick question, how do you manually enter repositories at installation? For me, it always defaults to selecting a preexisting, non-functional mirror off a list, and I never see any option to enter anything manually, like it does by default in the ppc64 installations. Thanks, Noah

Problem installing Debian PowerPC Jessie on PowerMac G5 7,3 PCI-X

I’m trying to install Debian Jessie ppc64 8.11 on my PowerMac G5 7,3 machine for comparison purposes with Adrian’s 10.0 “ports”. I downloaded the PowerPC 8.11 DVD and used it to install a default system. The only thing out of the ordinary was that I had to manually enter the packages mirror na

Re: Debian PowerPC and PowerPC Notebook: powerpc (32bit) - and eventually ppc64el...

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Fadi Osman wrote: [...] > Please contact us if you think there are subjects/packages we can work on. Well the powerpc specific list(s) can be found using usertags: Eg: https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?user=debian-powerpc%40lists.debian.org

Debian PowerPC and PowerPC Notebook: powerpc (32bit) - and eventually ppc64el...

Hello, (and a happy new year for you all) This is a follow up of the message I sent in december, from the behalf of the PowerPC Notebook project team.(http://www.powerpc-notebook.org) After a short discussion, and some solid arguments from some of you, we will start with the powerpc (Big Endian 3

Re: Debian PowerPC and PowerPC Notebook.

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:05:18PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 08:55:12PM +, Fadi Osman wrote: > > Hello Len, > > I am checking with the others before answering you questions. > > But I remember one of the reasons is that we were worried that powerpc > > would be e

Re: Debian PowerPC and PowerPC Notebook.

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 08:55:12PM +, Fadi Osman wrote: > Hello Len, > I am checking with the others before answering you questions. > But I remember one of the reasons is that we were worried that powerpc would > be eventually dropped in favor of ppc64 and ppc64el... Well I see very little h

Re: Debian PowerPC and PowerPC Notebook.

Hello Len, I am checking with the others before answering you questions. But I remember one of the reasons is that we were worried that powerpc would be eventually dropped in favor of ppc64 and ppc64el... Thanks,Fadi. De : Lennart Sorensen À : Linux User #330250 Cc : debian-powerpc

Re: Debian PowerPC and PowerPC Notebook.

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 08:31:39PM +0100, Linux User #330250 wrote: > Running 32-bit vs. 64-bit on powerpc makes me wonder… Is there a > multilib version of Debian powerpc? Well there are packages like lib64readline5 and libc6-ppc64 which provide 64 bit libraries as part of 32bit debian p

Re: Debian PowerPC and PowerPC Notebook.

Hello! Running 32-bit vs. 64-bit on powerpc makes me wonder… Is there a multilib version of Debian powerpc? I've been running Gentoo and Debian on my Power Mac G4 and G5. To me, the problem seemed to be that I could not run selected programs 64-bit (as suggested), because that would have

Re: Debian PowerPC and PowerPC Notebook.

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 01:35:42PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > To access more physical memory? But sure, they could run a 64-bit kernel > with a 32-bit userspace. That's certainly how I have been running larger powerpc machines for years. > But since this is going to be used as

Re: Debian PowerPC and PowerPC Notebook.

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:26:47AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 06:09:28AM +, Fadi Osman wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm contacting you on the behalf of the PowerPC Notebook project > > team.(http://www.powerpc-notebook.org) > > As you might already know, we are a group o

Re: Debian PowerPC and PowerPC Notebook.

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 06:09:28AM +, Fadi Osman wrote: > Hello, > I'm contacting you on the behalf of the PowerPC Notebook project > team.(http://www.powerpc-notebook.org) > As you might already know, we are a group of volunteers collaborating towards > building a notebook around the Freesca

Re : who are u ? debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

you have facebook

Debian-powerpc, dolārs guļ uz asfalta! Pacel augšā un iztērē!

Sumināts, Debian-powerpc! Klau, iespējams, ka Tu gribi atrast opciju, kā piepelnīties un saņemt papildus naudu saviem izdevumiem? Noriskē izdarīt akurāti tāpat kā jaunskungs tajā blogā: http://escr74.com/jaextmanager_data/komercstunda_numur_268.php Rīkojies tā: pārsūti šo websaiti arī

debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, how are you?

hi debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, hope this e-mail finds you in good spirits! Do you want to make some extra money with me? Do you wanna get in on this deal with me? I'm sure I could double the $2000/month if I had your help. http://bit.ly/f4S48c -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

hi debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org,

debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org hello, how are you doing? My New Year's Resolution is to increase my salary. This program is the truth! I recommend getting in on this ASAP! http://bit.ly/f98zZp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

d - I'm >linking the object with libc.so, which is built with the "default" >powerpc ABI. >I can't do this, the objects (.o and libc.so and startup modules >(crt..)) are incompatible, right? Right. >Not sure I understood. I mean the bug list for the powerpcspe &g

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

re then it is also correct since it goes for gcc which has > allready the correct default. > Not sure I understood. I mean the bug list for the powerpcspe http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=powerpcspe;users=debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc port is full of patches which essentiall

Re: GCC bug 44606 (was Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility)?

7c 3f 0b 78 mr r31,r1 15a4: 90 7f 00 68 stw r3,104(r31) ...) Also, just tried the CodeSourcery GCC 4.4.1 - the bug is here. Regards, Sergei > >Regards, > >Sergei > > Sebastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.or

Re: GCC bug 44606 (was Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility)?

t; so you shouldn't be able run the binary if you exlicitly enable using it. On the other hand, nobody is using 4.2 these days so it is not an option to switch to an older gcc. >Regards, >Sergei Sebastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

equired to emulate the floating point code in kernel leaving the "floating unit" untouched. I posted some numbers here [0] and there [1] and it didn't look good. So the result is not worth it. [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520877#48 [1] http://bugs.debian

GCC bug 44606 (was Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility)?

Hello Sebastian, Should the bug 44606 trigger on a e500v1 CPU? I can check it with gcc 4.2.2 on a MPC8560 system. Regards, Sergei -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Arc

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

packages you cross > compiled around. > > >Apparently, I need first to build the Debian toolchain, and then make > >sure the binaries are linked against the new-built Glibc, not the > >build host one. Also, because of the package dependencies, the order > >of pa

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

es, the order of >package's build is also important. The build order is more or less not impartant. For instance one of the essential files you need is bash and you want to build it. bash depends on dash so you try to get dash done. dash itself needs debianutils so try that one. And so on :

Re: Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

ons you want. > (I wonder - is it the big gain having them optimized?) Only the rigour of experimental tests will tell you :) (raw translation of "Seul de la rigueur expérimentale naîtra la vérité" :) ) > Thanks a lot for reply. You are welcome, xavier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

gt; original message----- > De: "brian m. carlson" sand...@crustytoothpaste.net > A: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org > Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:24:41 + > - > > > > On Fri, Sep 17,

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

Hello Sebastian, Thanks for reply! Please see my comments below. On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:19:29 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Sergei Poselenov | 2010-09-17 13:48:19 [+0400]: > > >Could you please answer some questions, regarding the use of the > >Debian powerpc d

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

whatever option you need. Hope it will help, xavier original message- De: "brian m. carlson" sand...@crustytoothpaste.net A: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:24:41 + - > On Fri,

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

* Sergei Poselenov | 2010-09-17 13:48:19 [+0400]: >Could you please answer some questions, regarding the use of the >Debian powerpc distro for embedded PowerPC system? > >- What exact target CPU it is built for? I see here > http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/inst/inst

Re: Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

the specific CPU? > Is it possible, knowing only the specific CPU type (440, 603, 8540, > 8560, etc) to say will it run Debian PowerPC Distro or not? > (I understand that there should be a kernel supporting the specific > board; I'm rather interested in the instructions set

Debian powerpc binary compatibility?

Hello all, Could you please answer some questions, regarding the use of the Debian powerpc distro for embedded PowerPC system? - What exact target CPU it is built for? I see here http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/inst/install the list of supported machines, but how can I understand will

Mimarlar ve Proje =??Q?b=FCrolar=FDna?= Proje =??Q?=DCcretlerimiz..**debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org**?=

UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/010f441b-40433-0dbb3712002...@ibh-4871cf76e86

Re: debian-powerpc support

oadcom, SOC) based. I > would not call the classic Cisco products embedded. > > Bastian > > -- > Only a fool fights in a burning house. >                -- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Re: debian-powerpc support

e ARM based. Most of the embedded routers (Linksys, ...) are MIPS (Broadcom, SOC) based. I would not call the classic Cisco products embedded. Bastian -- Only a fool fights in a burning house. -- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: debian-powerpc support

Gary -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8975ef73-14e5-4fb6-a328-b594538cb...@gmail.com

Re: debian-powerpc support

g. -- Dr. Janice Lester (in Kirk's body), "Turnabout Intruder", stardate 5928.5. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100828123154.ga29...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org

Re: debian-powerpc support

in my experience (as user) in embedded powerpc product (civil and environmental engineering tergetted) I only sow some industrial product based on a Crux PPC hardly customized. Btw, i suppose that Debian is always a great choice. cheers, nello -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ

Re: debian-powerpc support

e're considering using the > Debian powerpc port on an embedded device for one of our on-board > systems. Basically, the choice will have to be made whether we're > going for a inhouse minimal distribution specifically targeting the > target board or going with the debian powerpc

debian-powerpc support

Hello all, This is my first post in this mailinglist. We're considering using the Debian powerpc port on an embedded device for one of our on-board systems. Basically, the choice will have to be made whether we're going for a inhouse minimal distribution specifically targeting the targe

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

some time ago: http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2010/06/msg00028.html One particular point that may not be that obvious is that your current HFS partition may not be big enough to hold an initial grub2 image with all the modules (those found in /usr/lib/grub/powerpc-ieee1275/). Some of the modu

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

CRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c59519b-aaa9-475f-b904-0bedb9892...@pobox.com

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

sponsor a possible upload to unstable? I guess I could do that, if nobody more active than me volunteers. > Also, it would be very nice if we had reports from people that tried to use > GRUB2 on powerpc. There should be several reports of mine in the debian-powerpc list archives. In summa

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

ages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

I install disks don't have > this problem. Closing the bug (via BCC) per your update, thanks. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer |http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

maintenance access. I never got a reply, but the problem seems to have evaporated over time. I have no idea why. Current SID D-I install disks don't have this problem. Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

<mailto:tonynel...@georgeanelson.com> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1277907902.809...@localhost.localdomain

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

prehensible bug, as often around D-I ... > > and I also have a patch for util-linux specific to PPC that is waiting > > for monthes. > > As Rogerio asked, what patch and where did you submit it? BTW, when > filing bug reports affecting the powerpc port I think it's a good id

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

ugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568204 Did not push upstream, actually... A quick look at other bug reports and I see no activity from the maintainer (Jones LaMont). I also Cc'ed the author of the original kernel breakage, and benh too, but nothing came back. Regards, benjamin --

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

ted the people with buildd maintenance access. > > > and I also have a patch for util-linux specific to PPC that is waiting > > > for monthes. > > > > As Rogerio asked, what patch and where did you submit it? BTW, when > > filing bug reports affecting the powe

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

switch; 3 - you still have to strip the 0 from "(hd0)" in the device map file that grub creates, so that it can generate correct grub.cfg files for the boot time. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2009/06/msg00064.html So far, I am booting with grub2 by hand from Open Firmware, bu

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

Michel Dänzer wrote:: > As Rogerio asked, what patch and where did you submit it? BTW, when > filing bug reports affecting the powerpc port I think it's a good idea > to tell reportbug to send the report to the debian-powerpc list as well, > so we can get an idea of what issues

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

rio asked, what patch and where did you submit it? BTW, when filing bug reports affecting the powerpc port I think it's a good idea to tell reportbug to send the report to the debian-powerpc list as well, so we can get an idea of what issues there are. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer |

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

ware looks for that binary; * the grub binary loads the kernel The longer story: * http://grub.enbug.org/TestingOnPowerPC * http://oskuro.net/blog/freesoftware/time-for-grub2-2008-02-09-17-53 * http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2009/06/msg00064.html > I wanted to help for a problem with th

Re: Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

ith the buildd but Frans Pop told us that it needed a DD to be solved, and I also have a patch for util-linux specific to PPC that is waiting for monthes. But there are only users and simple developers left on the debian-powerpc ML, so we're a bit alone and hopeless ... Still, you're right

Debian PowerPc installer initramfs-tools generates malformed yaboot.conf created when alternate partitions use UUID= in fstab

tually dropping into the (initrd) BusyBox shell. When I went back and changed the offending line to append="root=/dev/hda6 ro" and reran ybin, everything was fine. See bug # 580455 for another aspect of the switch to UUID naming being broken on powerPC. Enjoy! Rick -- To UNSUBS

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

On Dec 17, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Frans Pop wrote: On Thursday 17 December 2009, Rick Thomas wrote: It may not be "grave" for the installer (indeed, you've already established at great length that it's not an installer problem at all) but that doesn't make it any the less grave for whatever pack

Re: Debian PowerPC Squeeze - "packages have unmet dependencies"

Dear Rick Rick Thomas wrote: >> gnome: Depends: tomboy (>= 1.0) but it is not installable I think that is answered in the Thread "Problems with Debian PowerPC" by Rick Thomas of 12/16/2009 09:23 PM. Regards, Adrian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@list

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

hing is copied over to testing autobuilding is >> automatically stopped, which might be another bug of its own. > > So, what can be done to fix the current breakage? Have tomboy (and mono) migrate to testing so meta-gnome2 can migrate to testing. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Debian PowerPC Squeeze - "packages have unmet dependencies"

I understand "normal churn" in testing and unstable, but these problems have persisted for over a week. Attached is the log of an attempt to do "aptitude full-upgrade" on my Debian Squeeze PowerPC test machine. Here's the part that first indicates there might be trouble... The following p

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

matically stopped, which might be another bug of its own. So, what can be done to fix the current breakage? Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 02:49:47PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > It's almost certain that both the relevant package maintainer and the > > release team are already aware of this and that it has been a conscious > > choice to accept the breakage. > Given that the package version clearly indicat

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

n-release for input on the uninstallability of gnome in > > testing. > > You're right, I missed that. OTOH, it must still have been consciously accepted from testing-p-u into testing by the release team, despite missing arches. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@list

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

You're right, I missed that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:39:39PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > This looks like a fairly likely reason: > http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/gnome-core > For some reason the package was forced to testing even though it was not > available on all architectures. > If that is the reason, then it means

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

locked by other packages for now: http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=meta-gnome2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

nowledgeable than I -- will be appreciated, of course. Season's greetings... Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

powerpc, or is it general These things can be found out relatively simply using aptitude and packages.debian.org. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

just an interested and willing tester, do to help? Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

hemselves. What problems exist in Squeeze? Please file an installation report. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

elves. And they won't get fixed if nobody brings them up in public. I'm just bringing them up so they can get fixed. I'm sorry if cross-posting it to debian-boot has offended you, Franz. Please accept my apology. Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lis

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

is very much wanted. So if anyone does want to help, please do join the d-boot list, and start testing and working on issues. Cheers, FJP [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2009/12/msg00257.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

P.S.: Otávio, please, get in touch. -- Rogério Brito : rbr...@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Problems with Debian PowerPC

o un-resolvable dependency conflicts. Can anything be done about to fix this? What can I (as a user, non- developer, but willing tester) do to help? Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: LogMeIn Debian PowerPC equivalent

A Sunday 30 November 2008 06:53:47, Esteban Monge escreveu: > Hello... I need a LogMeIn equivalent server for my Debian PowerPC Linux... > but dont recomend me VNC, I need a similar system to LogMeInc > > Regards... FreeNX should do want you need -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

LogMeIn Debian PowerPC equivalent

Hello... I need a LogMeIn equivalent server for my Debian PowerPC Linux... but dont recomend me VNC, I need a similar system to LogMeInc Regards... -- http://nuevaeracr.blogspot.com Linux user number 478378 Linux machine number 386687 Tec. Esteban Monge Marín Tel: (506) 8379-3562 "No

Re: No sound in snes9x (Debian PowerPC PS3 Port)

Hi, Thanks for your help. It work and now I have ound in snes9x. Do you know how do I make this permanent for snes9x so I don't have to type it everytime I start snes9x? I use a gnome front end to graphically start and run snes9x but it won't have sound if I use the graphical front end gsnes9x

Re: No sound in snes9x (Debian PowerPC PS3 Port)

* Norberto Feliberty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-29 20:52:56 CEST]: > Hi, I have alsa-oss installed. I don't understand how to set it up or > if it is possible to set up snes9x to use alsa. There's no need to set it up, just prefix the program you want to run with aoss, so "aoss snes9x" should d

Re: No sound in snes9x (Debian PowerPC PS3 Port)

Hi, I have alsa-oss installed. I don't understand how to set it up or if it is possible to set up snes9x to use alsa. How do I find this out? What term do I google to find out how to do this? Thanks. [http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/betathanks/download/images/download_2.jpg] Norberto ___

Re: No sound in snes9x (Debian PowerPC PS3 Port)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Norberto Feliberty pisze: > Hi When playing games with snes9x emulator, I get the following message. > > > > Reading config file /etc/snes9x/snes9x.conf > Controller Port 1: Pad 1 > Controller Port 2: > /dev/dsp: No such file or directory > Sound

No sound in snes9x (Debian PowerPC PS3 Port)

Hi When playing games with snes9x emulator, I get the following message. Reading config file /etc/snes9x/snes9x.conf Controller Port 1: Pad 1 Controller Port 2: /dev/dsp: No such file or directory Sound device open failed Using ROM Street Fighter 2 Turbo.smc in sfiit.zip Found ROM file header

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 07:58 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On lun, 2007-09-03 at 21:44 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote: > > If you don't like that, become a DD > > So you have 2 years to search a good answer to his questions? You forgot the other part: Throw a GR. -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAI

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 06:31 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Notice that it was because i candidated for DPL, and because i wanted to > change a certain amount of thngs in debian, that i was expulsed. Do you > really think the DAMs will allow a DD who is supportive of me ? Have you > not read Anthony To

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

On lun, 2007-09-03 at 21:44 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote: > If you don't like that, become a DD So you have 2 years to search a good answer to his questions? -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:04 +, Jörg Sommer wrote: > > More people and DDs privately asked listmasters to place the ban again, > > than the users asking for the ban to be lifted. > > Can you give names and numbers? Telling us there where some guys they > asked for reinstate the ban of Sven is n

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

2007/9/3, Francesco Pedrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Monday 03 September 2007, Gunther Furtado wrote: > > 2007/8/30, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I object! Please don't lift the ban. After lifting the ban Sven has > > > clearly shown, that he did not understand why he was banned fro

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

On Monday 03 September 2007, Gunther Furtado wrote: > 2007/8/30, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I object! Please don't lift the ban. After lifting the ban Sven has > > clearly shown, that he did not understand why he was banned from > > the list and that he is not willing to change his b

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

2007/8/30, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I object! Please don't lift the ban. After lifting the ban Sven has > clearly shown, that he did not understand why he was banned from the > list and that he is not willing to change his behaviour. > > Gaudenz > I second that. I feel, sadly, that

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

On Monday 03 September 2007, Mike Hore wrote: [Snip] I've read the archives, and I have to agree with Mike Hore. I never talked to Sven directly and I don't know him, but as spectator I think that he was threated unfairly and he doesn't deserve *any* of the steps againist his contributions to de

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

I wrote: Hi Julien, Mike Hore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes -- I've only been reading the list for 6 months or so and to me this action looks quite arbitrary and extreme -- IMHO of course -- some background would be very welcome. List regulars say things like "we all know" and "it's obvious"

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

> > For others' information, Sven has sent me a long description of what > happened from his side, and he wants it to be available to anyone. He > suggested I forward it to the list, but I think it might be OK if I just > forward it by private email to anyone who asks me. I'm happy to do this.

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

Hi Julien, Mike Hore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes -- I've only been reading the list for 6 months or so and to me this action looks quite arbitrary and extreme -- IMHO of course -- some background would be very welcome. List regulars say things like "we all know" and "it's obvious" -- but to

Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org

Mike Hore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes -- I've only been reading the list for 6 months or so and to me > this action looks quite arbitrary and extreme -- IMHO of course -- > some background would be very welcome. List regulars say things like > "we all know" and "it's obvious" -- but to me at

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >