Re: 64bit status report : biarch toolchain and ppc64 debian kernel.

2005-08-17 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:30:33 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Yeah, things are not as fast as we hope, but we are a volunteer > > organisation, > > so we will see. > > > > But if in a month or so NPTL is not yet enabled, we will go and ask them, > > but > > the current way is to make sma

Re: Bug#271878: asm/setup.h non-existent #include on ppc

2004-10-01 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:10:09 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 02:02:59PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > Hmmm.. How many of these #includes (or > > #else's them in) does glibc (or really, any non-kernel user) need? > > Would someone have the time to try casing all of these inside of

Re: Bug#271878: asm/setup.h non-existent #include on ppc

2004-09-26 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:02:59 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:42:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000, > > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > On

Re: Bug#271878: asm/setup.h non-existent #include on ppc

2004-09-25 Thread GOTO Masanori
Hi Ben and Geert, At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Hi, > > > > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500, > > Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > asm/setup

Re: Bug#271878: asm/setup.h non-existent #include on ppc

2004-09-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
Hi, At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500, Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > asm/setup.h contains #include , > which is non-existent on ppc. Then what's the problem? I guess you didn't get any problems; if so I close this bug. BTW, PPC guys, is it intentional to include asm-m68k/set

Re: 2.4 & 2.6 kernels, should sarge be 2.6 only at least for powerpc ?

2004-06-30 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:51:22 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > So, i am seriously considering dropping all 2.4 powerpc kernels, and > going with 2.6 only, and would like to get feedback both from > debian-kernel as well as debian-powerpc, feedback i didn't get in the > past. > > Ah, and i am seriously c

Re: Anyone using kterm/kinput2?

2004-01-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:25:43 -0600, Michael Heldebrant wrote: > I'm trying to figure out why I can't actually get kinput2 working right > on my ibook2.2. I have it working on 2 other i386 machines currently, > hence the powerpc posting. > > I've got the locales built (ja_JP), canna, kinput2 and

Re: Blackdown JDK and sid (was: Re: java 1.4 for ppc)

2003-04-21 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:53:40 -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > j2sdk1.3.1-02d is compiled with gcc 3.2.2 > > Please try it with a mozilla compiled with gcc 3.2.2 and > and with gcc-2.3.1 with the proper compatibility patch for the compiler it > was built with. > > This does w

Re: review wanted of new Debian X FAQ entry

2003-03-04 Thread GOTO Masanori
At 04 Mar 2003 20:18:00 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Op ma 03-03-2003, om 23:45 schreef Branden Robinson: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > > Le lun 03/03/2003 ? 01:36, Branden Robinson a ?crit : > > > > > > >To date, no kernels with the feature of se