At Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:02:59 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:42:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000, > > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500, > > > > > Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > asm/setup.h contains #include <asm-m68k/setup.h>, > > > > > > which is non-existent on ppc. > > > > > > > > > > Then what's the problem? I guess you didn't get any problems; if so I > > > > > close this bug. > > > > > > > > > > BTW, PPC guys, is it intentional to include asm-m68k/setup.h in > > > > > /usr/include/asm-ppc/setup.h ? At a glance, we have no need to > > > > > include this header in setup.h. > > > > > > > > This is historically used by the APUS platform, which I think is an m68k > > > > amiga with a ppc CPU stucked in it, but then, ask Geert, he'll know > > > > better. > > > > > > Thanks for your reply. Geert, is it APUS still alive? If so, I guess > > > asm-m68k/setup.h is necessary for asm-ppc/setup.h. > > > > Yes, AFAIK APUS is still alive.
Cool, thanks Geert. > Hmmm.. How many of these <asm-ppc/foo.h> #includes <asm-m68k/foo.h> (or > #else's them in) does glibc (or really, any non-kernel user) need? > Would someone have the time to try casing all of these inside of #ifdef > __KERNEL__ ? I've finished doing similar for SH recently (asm/cpu/ and > asm/mach/ symlinks in this case) and found none of it was really needed. Exactly, AFAIK, there are no headers to include them. Regards, -- gotom
