At Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:10:09 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 02:02:59PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > Hmmm.. How many of these <asm-ppc/foo.h> #includes <asm-m68k/foo.h> (or > > #else's them in) does glibc (or really, any non-kernel user) need? > > Would someone have the time to try casing all of these inside of #ifdef > > __KERNEL__ ? I've finished doing similar for SH recently (asm/cpu/ and > > asm/mach/ symlinks in this case) and found none of it was really needed. > > How old were the kernel headers in question here? In 2.6 and 2.4 > current, <asm-ppc/setup.h> is already protected with a __KERNEL__ test.
We were discussing about 2.6.0-test7. Thanks for your checking - even if that version is not enclosed __KERNEL__, we've just known it'll be fixed in the next linux-kernel-headers update. Regards, -- gotom
