On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 23:39, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > It is not synthetic. It feels really sluggish in the shell compared to
> > 2.4... Also I have CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled and now I do wonder that I did
> > not yet see a random crash - hmmhhh well except for a try to get
> > cryptoloop work
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 23:20, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:59:11PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > > although it can't handle brightness at the moment. Patch is against
> > > 2.4.22-ben2.
> > A slightly updated version (that additionally turns off the backlight at
> > level
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 14:04, P Oscar Boykin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 09:11:16AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > I doubt that even a working CONFIG_PREEMPT would make any good
> > difference. Kernel preemption is just a crappy feature to please
> > lame slashdotters
> >
> > Ben.
>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 09:11:16AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I doubt that even a working CONFIG_PREEMPT would make any good
> difference. Kernel preemption is just a crappy feature to please
> lame slashdotters
>
> Ben.
Are you joking? I have heard that it is a pretty good feature f
Hello Luca,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Luca Padovani wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm quoting an old thread 'cause a similar thing just happened to me. I
> can't boot Debian Linux anymore :-(
> It started just after having used MacOSX for a couple of hours. After
> that, Linux (ke
Hi Michel,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:22:44PM +0100, Mich Lanners wrote:
> On 28 Oct, this message from Georg Koss echoed through cyberspace:
> > I own an PBG412.
>^^
> >
> [snip]
> > 3.) That plan B video stuff has to be disabled.
>
> Why do you want to use PlanB on your Power
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 23:30, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 18:00, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:51, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You may be encountering a different issue ... (2.6 is
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 00:04, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du mercredi 29 octobre 2003,
> vers 13:46, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> >> > CONFIG_PREEMPT might make a difference, pity it causes crashes and all
> >> > around weird behaviour about as so
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du mercredi 29 octobre 2003,
vers 13:46, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> > CONFIG_PREEMPT might make a difference, pity it causes crashes and all
>> > around weird behaviour about as soon as RAM is fully used.
>>
>> I use CONFIG_PREEMPT and got
> It is not synthetic. It feels really sluggish in the shell compared to
> 2.4... Also I have CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled and now I do wonder that I did
> not yet see a random crash - hmmhhh well except for a try to get
> cryptoloop working. That was reliably crashing.
>
> Should I go for the old rade
> Maybe I'm a lame slashdotter then. :) In my experience it enhances
> interactivity considerably.
Hrm... well... _maybe_, though at the expense of overall perfs.
Ben.
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:56, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:39, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:28, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:51, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > >
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 18:00, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:51, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > You may be encountering a different issue ... (2.6 is usually overall
> > > faster than 2.4 here, though I haven't ti
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 23:11, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Weird. Maybe this (rather synthetic BTW - it doesn't feel slow doing
> > 'real' work, does it?) test tickles very bad behaviour in something
> > which has changed radically in the 2.6 kernel, the scheduler maybe?
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT migh
> Weird. Maybe this (rather synthetic BTW - it doesn't feel slow doing
> 'real' work, does it?) test tickles very bad behaviour in something
> which has changed radically in the 2.6 kernel, the scheduler maybe?
> CONFIG_PREEMPT might make a difference, pity it causes crashes and all
> around weird
I am trying to install Debian on the new 15in TiPowerbook.
I found your article on installing on an iBook by Branden
Robinson http://people.debian.org/~branden/ibook/ and I
followed it to the exactly for doing a dual boot between
Linux and OS X. However when I start the install from Open
firmwar
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:22, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En ce doux début de matinée du mercredi 29 octobre 2003, vers
> 08:56, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT might make a difference, pity it causes crashes and all
> > around weird behaviour about as soon as RAM is
On 28 Oct, this message from Georg Koss echoed through cyberspace:
> I own an PBG412.
^^
Hmmm...
> I rsynced 2.6.0-test7 from source.mvista.com and compiled that kernel,
> which worked with two minor problems.
>
[snip]
> 3.) That plan B video stuff has to be disabled.
Why do you
Hi everybody,
I'm quoting an old thread 'cause a similar thing just happened to me. I
can't boot Debian Linux anymore :-(
It started just after having used MacOSX for a couple of hours. After
that, Linux (kernel 2.4.21 ben2) doesn't boot, it just prints 15/20 lines
during startup and then the mac
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du mercredi 29 octobre 2003, vers
08:56, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Weird. Maybe this (rather synthetic BTW - it doesn't feel slow doing
> 'real' work, does it?) test tickles very bad behaviour in something
> which has changed radically in the 2.6 k
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 05:25:02PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:24:26PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > debian-powerpc:
> >
> > My plan is to only have the debian-installer package list i386 and
> > powerpc as its architectures at first, and add more architectures later
> >
Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm trying to get an upload of the debian-installer boot images
> (everything except CD) into the Debian archive, similar to how the
> boot-floppies used to go into the archive. I think that this will be
> increasingly important as we begin to stabalize d-i before release, and
>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:24:26PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> debian-powerpc:
>
> My plan is to only have the debian-installer package list i386 and
> powerpc as its architectures at first, and add more architectures later
> as they are ready. It should be possible to autobuild the images on at
> l
Hey All,
I went to upgrade galeon today, and now I'm getting relocation errors:
Setting up mozilla-browser (1.5-2) ...
Updating mozilla chrome registry...regxpcom: relocation error:
/usr/lib/mozilla/components/libnsgif.so: undefined symbol:
NS_NewGenericModule__FPCcUiP21nsModuleComponentInfoPFP
subscribe
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:51, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > You may be encountering a different issue ... (2.6 is usually overall
> > faster than 2.4 here, though I haven't timed gnome-terminal specifically)
>
> it is not gnome-termin
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:39, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:28, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:51, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You may be encountering a different issue ... (2.6 i
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:28, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:51, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > You may be encountering a different issue ... (2.6 is usually overall
> > > faster than 2.4 here,
>
> Same here. S
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:51, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > You may be encountering a different issue ... (2.6 is usually overall
> > faster than 2.4 here,
Same here. Soeren, have you verified the difference actually is related
to X
Nevermind. I had to re-write the crappy makefile.
Now it compiles perfectly on the PPC. If anyone
wants the Makefile to start your own private p2p
network on your ppc, let me know.
--
wcrowshaw
I'm trying to get an upload of the debian-installer boot images
(everything except CD) into the Debian archive, similar to how the
boot-floppies used to go into the archive. I think that this will be
increasingly important as we begin to stabalize d-i before release, and
now is not too soon to star
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:29:04AM -0500, Joshua Narins wrote:
> Isn't there some smart debian person who could figure out where this
> is coming from?
An awful lot of random infected Windows machines, I strongly suspect.
There Is No Cabal.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
> Not sure if you're using a POP 3 account but I've been using mailfilter
> to delete these from the server prior to download with fetchmail and it
> works pretty well. Let me know if you want the rc file off list. Even
> if you aren't using POP3, you may be able to adapt it for filtering in
>
Greetings,
I've figured out that one should press alt-museum-o-f to boot into OpenFirmware.
However, I cannot figure out which command would positively confirm whether this
333 MHz iMac CRT has the required firmware upgrade 1.2 needed to access 256mb
memory modules.
Could anyone enlighten me a
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:59:11PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > although it can't handle brightness at the moment. Patch is against
> > 2.4.22-ben2.
> A slightly updated version (that additionally turns off the backlight at
> level == 0) can be found at:
> http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 18:03, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
>
> > also the system load was noticably higher in 2.6 (the sysload applet was
> > completely filled while it was maybe 1/3 filled in 2.4)
>
> While the radeon driver can make a diff
> It's similar to what I reported a time ago after a MacOSX-upgrade (Panther).
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt recommended to upgrade my 2.4.* kernel which
> solved the problem, which, as he explained short, was in some context
> with cpufreq.
No, the problem must be different. The fix that went into
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 18:03, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> also the system load was noticably higher in 2.6 (the sysload applet was
> completely filled while it was maybe 1/3 filled in 2.4)
While the radeon driver can make a difference in console (2.6 version
isn't accelerated), it has no impact on
Hi...
As I am now on 2.6.0-test7 using the new radeon driver I realized that
the scrolling speed in a multi-gnome-terminal is approx. 8 times slower
than with 2.4.
to test I used just time find ./ in my home directory and it took
real4m29.802s
user0m1.230s
sys 0m7.830s
on 2.4.23 som
39 matches
Mail list logo
