On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:51, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 09:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > You may be encountering a different issue ... (2.6 is usually overall > > faster than 2.4 here,
Same here. Soeren, have you verified the difference actually is related to X, e.g. by redirecting the output to a file? Did you conduct both tests as soon after bootup as possible to minimize the influence of caching? ... > > though I haven't timed gnome-terminal specifically) > > it is not gnome-terminal but multi-gnome-terminal which is more like > xterm. So no antialiasing -> much faster. I'm using non-AA fonts in gnome-terminal 2.4, thanks to fontconfig. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer